You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 6, June 1951 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ AT FIFTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, MINNEAPOLIS, NOV. 29-DEC. 2, 1950
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PROGNOSIS OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA

Effect of Extent of Resection

WALTON D. THOMAS, M.D.; JOHN M. WAUGH, M.D.; MALCOLM B. DOCKERTY, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1951;62(6):847-855.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IT IS POSSIBLE that total gastrectomy is the treatment of choice in all carcinomas of the stomach.1 Because of the excessive gravity of this suggestion, its worth should be critically evaluated from every possible angle before it is generally adopted.

A mere philosophy of radicalism is not sufficient. The concept of removing the entire substance of any nonvital organ harboring cancer is not necessarily valid. This concept carried to the point of absurdity would suggest the removal of the entire face for a small basal cell carcinoma. A more valid, and probably more radical over-all concept, is that of removing all areas suggested by the known pathologic characteristics of a given malignant lesion.

Strict observance of the pathologic aspects of malignancy has seldom failed to bear surgical fruit. This is true regardless of whether it leads to a more conservative or a more radical operation. In any historical review . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN.

Dr. Thomas is a Fellow in Surgery, Mayo Foundation; Dr. Waugh is from the Division of Surgery, and Dr. Dockerty from the Division of Surgical Pathology, Mayo Clinic.


Footnotes

Read at the Fifty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Minneapolis, Dec. 1, 1950.

Abridgment of thesis submitted by Dr. Thomas to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Surgery.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1951 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.