You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 63 No. 5, November 1951 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Case Reports
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PATENT OMPHALOMESENTERIC DUCT

HOWARD B. KIRTLAND, Jr., M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1951;63(5):706-711.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THERE have been 134 cases of patent omphalomesenteric duct reported, which figure probably does not reflect its true incidence. Of this number, 30 have been complicated by ileal prolapse, with only four operative recoveries. Many of these reports were made before the advent of present-day surgical technics and antibiotic adjuncts. It is thought that today early clinical recognition of patent omphalomesenteric duct and its complications coupled with prompt surgical intervention plus the aid of antibiotics should result in a considerably lower mortality for this condition. Because of this, the successful treatment of a case of patent omphalomesenteric duct with ileal prolapse is deemed worthy of report.

Anomalies in the umbilical region of clinical significance are rare. Consequently, their importance, embryologic origins, and clinical recognition were long ignored. In 1904 Cullen,1 who up to that time had thought that hernia constituted the main lesion in this locality, was at a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SAN DIEGO, CALIF.

From the Surgical Service, San Diego County General Hospital.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1951 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.