You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 64 No. 3, March 1952 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (67)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

ACUTE DIVERTICULITIS OF THE CECUM

A Report of Four Cases and Review of One Hundred Fifty-Three Surgical Cases

JAMES LAURIDSEN, M.D.; FREDERICK P. ROSS, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1952;64(3):320-330.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

AMONG 6,114 surgical patients admitted to the Veterans Administration Hospital, West Roxbury, Mass., four cases of diverticulitis of the cecum were encountered in the 18 months ending March 1, 1951. Since this disease is not common, these four cases are reported along with a brief review of the literature on this subject.

Only 149 other surgically proved cases were found after a careful search of the available literature. However, diverticulitis of the cecum may be commoner than is generally realized, and therefore the available information is worth reviewing.

REPORT OF CASES

CASE 1.

—A 23-year-old clerk entered the hospital on Aug. 23, 1949, with right lower quadrant pain of four days' duration. There had been no nausea or vomiting.

Physical examination revealed spasm, tenderness, and rebound tenderness in the right lower quadrant. The temperature was 99.6 F., peristalsis was normal, and no mass was palpable. There was high right rectal . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BOSTON

Resident in Surgery, Veterans Administration Hospital, West Roxbury, Mass. (Dr. Lauridsen); Chief, Surgical Service, Veterans Administration Hospital, West Roxbury, Mass., and Instructor in Surgery, Harvard and Tufts Medical Schools, Boston, Mass. (Dr. Ross).


Footnotes

Sponsored by the Veterans Administration and published with the approval of the Chief Medical Director. The statements and conclusions published by the authors are a result of their own study and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of the Veterans Administration.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1952 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.