You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 64 No. 5, May 1952 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers Read at Fifty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, Nov. 29-Dec.1, 1951
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CARCINOMA OF RECTOSIGMOID AND UPPER PART OF RECTUM

Recurrence Following Low Anterior Resection

EDWARD S. JUDD, Jr., M.D.; NICHOLAS J. BELLEGIE, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1952;64(5):697-706.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN RECENT years surgeons have debated the proper treatment for cancers in that part of the terminal colon variously described as "rectosigmoid," "upper rectum," or "lower sigmoid." The controversy is still unsettled. The literature is replete with reports of studies done on cadavers and on surgical patients. Much time and effort have been expended in surveying the mode of spread of these cancers. Occasionally the reader is confused because evidence developed in the attempt to prove one part of the controversy will later be used by another authority in the attempt to prove what might appear to be just the opposite. At present most surgeons have decided the question for themselves; they have continued to apply surgical procedures that they think best in their own hands and have abandoned certain other procedures which they think have not proved adequate. One wonders occasionally whether some of this reasoning is based on . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN.

From the Division of Surgery, Mayo Clinic (Dr. Judd), and the Mayo Foundation of the University of Minnesota (Dr. Bellegie, Fellow in Surgery).


Footnotes

Read at the Fifty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Colorado Springs, Colo., Nov. 30, 1951.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1952 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.