You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 64 No. 6, June 1952 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PARTIAL GASTRECTOMY WITH AND WITHOUT VAGUS RESECTION IN TREATMENT OF DUODENAL ULCER

Comparative Analysis of Results of Gastrectomy Alone and Combined with Infradiaphragmatic Vagus Resection

LOUIS T. PALUMBO, M.D.; R. E. PAUL, M.D.; G. T. WESTLY, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1952;64(6):756-765.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THERE has existed for many years a difference in opinion as to the type of surgical procedure which would be most efficacious in those cases of duodenal ulcer in which surgical treatment is required. Until the reports of Dragstedt in 1943 concerning the value and indications for vagotomy in the treatment of duodenal ulcer, the majority of surgeons in this country were performing a partial gastrectomy as the procedure of choice, with a high percentage of favorable results. The reintroduction of this operation of dividing or resecting a portion of the vagus nerves resulted in many surgeons and surgical groups adopting this form of surgical therapy in a large number of their cases.

During a period of about seven years, at least 4,000 vagotomies, or vagus resections, were performed in this country. The preliminary reports from various areas were favorable; however, many of these surgeons have now returned to their . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

DES MOINES, IOWA

From the Department of Surgery, Veterans Administration Hospital.


Footnotes

Sponsored by the Veterans Administration and published with the approval of the Chief Medical Director. The statements and conclusions published by the authors are the result of their own study and do not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of the Veterans Administration.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1952 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.