This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Analysis of One Hundred Thirteen Consecutive Amputations in One Hundred Eight Patients, 1939 to 1952

LOUIS CARP, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1953;66(1):115-125.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MIDTHIGH amputations for gangrene resulting from peripheral vascular disease, arteriosclerotic and/or diabetic, have presented a number of important problems which have a direct relationship to morbidity and mortality. They include procrastination and timing of operation; technical methods; closed versus open stumps; anesthesia, especially the contraindicated refrigeration anesthesia with tourniquet; postoperative stump care, and supportive and nutritional therapy.

During World War II, the Surgeon General's Office deemed it advisable to adopt a standard method for midthigh amputations, leaving the stumps open and applying traction. This was sound practice in comparatively young men, whose wounds almost always had virulent mixed infections and frequent long latent periods before operative therapy. It was also possible that this procedure was safer in the hands of those with limited experience. Medical officers became so thoroughly indoctrinated with the principle of traction on stumps which were left open that some of them have permitted this method to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
NEW YORK

From the Second Surgical Division, Goldwater Memorial Hospital.

Footnotes
Read before the Fifth Annual Meeting, the Gerontological Society, Washington, D. C., Sept. 5-7, 1952.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?