This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

W. RALPH DEATON, Jr., M.D.; H. H. BRADSHAW, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1953;66(5):641-645.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

EDEMA of the arm following radical mastectomy for carcinoma of the breast, in the absence of metastatic or recurrent disease in the axilla, has a reported incidence of from 10 to 50%. The edema varies in severity from a mild almost unnoticeable enlargement to massive swelling; disability may be so pronounced as to preclude use of the arm even to perform simple household tasks. There are many methods advocated for prevention and treatment of the condition, but the exact cause of the edema remains in doubt.

HISTORICAL

Halsted,¹ in 1921, published the first article dealing with elephantiasis chirurgica. It was his opinion that blockage of the lymphatic and venous channels predisposed toward edema but that it was necessary for infection to occur before the edema became significant. In particular, he believed that primary closure, with tenting of the skin across both axillary and infraclavicular spaces, which permitted pooling of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
GREENSBORO, N. C.; WINSTON-SALEM, N. C.

From the Department of Surgery, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest College, Winston-Salem.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?