You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 71 No. 1, July 1955 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intravenous Urography

Improved Technique Using Dimenhydrinate (Dramamine) to Prevent Undesirable Side-Effects; Preliminary Report

DAVID ROBINSON, M.D.; JEROME M. VAETH, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1955;71(1):78-79.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Intravenous urography is becoming an increasingly safer procedure as improvement in the iodine-containing contrast media has been developed.1 With decreases in serious reactions to patients, there has been a corresponding decrease in mild but unpleasant side-effects, such as nausea, vomiting, vertigo, flushing, urticaria, and arm pain. These untoward reactions, while by no means serious, cause the patient concern and discomfort and often indirectly influence the quality of the roentgenograms.

Recently, investigators have reported that antihistaminic preparations administered before I.V. pyelography have decreased the incidence of side-effects. Bryne and Melick,2 administering oral diphenhydramine (Benadryl) before the injection of a 70% solution of acetrizoate (Urokon) decreased undesirable side-effects of urticaria and excessive lachrymation completely, but the incidence of nausea or vomiting did not diminish. Bohne and Christeson, using antihistaminic premedication, decreased the incidence of all side-effects to 4%, in contrast to the 17% rate of reactions when antihistaminics were not . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Savannah, Ga.

Consultant, U. S. P. H. S. (Dr. Robinson); Resident in Radiology, Penrose Cancer Hospital, and military leave of absence to U. S. P. H. S. (Dr. Vaeth).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1955 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.