You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 73 No. 3, September 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Alimentary Tract Duplications

W. K. SIEBER, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1956;73(3):383-392.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Duplications of the alimentary tract may be defined as those cystic and tubular structures found in relation to normal bowel whose walls resemble intestine and consist of smooth muscle with alimentary tract mucosa. Synonyms for duplication include enterocystoma, enterogenous cyst, enteric cyst, giant diverticulum, ileum duplex, gastroenteric cyst, gastrogenous cyst, and reduplication of the intestine. "Atypical" and "ectopic" Meckel's diverticula are usually duplications. Single reports and reports of small numbers of cases in the literature suggest that duplications occur infrequently. This report concerns 25 cases in which one or more alimentary tract duplications were present. were Negro and 22 were white. There were 12 male and 13 female patients.

Duplications were discovered or confirmed at surgery in 19 cases.

Duplications were discovered at necropsy in six patients. In three instances (Table 1) it was small and had been asymptomatic. In the remaining three patients of this group, the unrecognized duplication . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Pittsburgh

From the surgical service of the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and the Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 3, 1956.

Read at the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Rochester, Minn., Feb. 24, 1956.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.