You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 73 No. 3, September 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

End-to-Side Bypass Homograft Without Resection in Segmental Arterial Occlusion

HAROLD LAUFMAN, M.D., Ph.D.; ROBERT HOHF, M.D.; VICTOR BERNHARD, M.D.; OTTO TRIPPEL, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1956;73(3):418-431.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The bypass principle in the treatment of segmental vascular occlusions was apparently initiated by Kunlin and associates1 in 1951, who employed an autologous vein to bridge an arterial occlusion. However, only in the past year or two, with the use of homologous arterial grafts, has the principle enjoyed widespread acceptance and application. The arterial graft seems to have definite advantages over the venous graft. Several American surgeons * have already reported quotable success in large series of patients with arteriosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities treated by bypass arterial grafts.

Reasons for the popularity of this method are obvious. The risks inherent in endarterectomy or in arterial resection with graft replacement appear to be virtually absent in the bypass operation. Existing circulation is not disturbed and is therefore not endangered. The incidence of failure appears to be less than that of other procedures. Unless an occlusion progresses rapidly in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Evanston, III.

From the Departments of Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School and Veterans' Administration Research Hospital, Passavant Memorial Hospital, and Evanston Hospital.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 3, 1956.

Read at the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Rochester, Minn., Feb. 24, 1956.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.