You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 73 No. 3, September 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Subtotal Gastrectomy for Peptic Ulcer

A Comprehensive Review of Two Hundred Thirty-Six Cases with Emphasis on the Treatment of the Ulcer Which Causes Obstruction

WILLIAM S. CAUDELL, M.D.; C. MARSHALL LEE, Jr., M.D.; CARL A. LIEBIG, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1956;73(3):469-480.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Dissatisfaction with the results obtained by conservative methods has led, during the past 20 years, to a more aggressive approach to the treatment of peptic ulcer and to the use of gastric resection in an increasing proportion of cases. Yet if the results of resection were indeed as favorable as many reports would suggest, there would be little need for the numerous published appraisals of one technique as compared with another or for the continual restless search for better methods. A good deal has been written about the management of the patient whose ulcer is bleeding severely or has perforated. Extensive consideration has been given to the anatomical or physiological merits of the Billroth I and Billroth II principles, and to departures from either of these basic techniques in the elective surgery of peptic ulcer. In most of the studies in the latter group emphasis has been on the operation . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Cincinnati

From the Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, and the Surgical Services, Cincinnati General and Veterans Administration Hospitals, Dayton and Cincinnati.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 3, 1956.

Read at the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Rochester, Minn., Feb. 24, 1956.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.