You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 73 No. 5, November 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Axillary Node Examination in Breast Cancer

Clearing and Sectioning Technique in Search of Metastasis

NEIL G. PERKINSON, M.D.; WALTER W. BRANDES, M.D.; FRANK P. SHEPARD, Jr., M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1956;73(5):828-832.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Prognostication for the patient undergoing radical mastectomy for carcinoma is based primarily on involvement of the axillary lymph nodes removed at time of dissection. The practical importance of this method need only be mentioned here, for most surgeons realize that when cancer of the breast is still limited to the breast itself the chances of being permanently cured of that lesion are decidedly better than if there is even minimal spread to axillary nodes.

The converse is also true; i. e., the patient whose operative specimen shows metastatic axillary involvement, particularly if several nodes are involved, has far poorer chance of permanent cure. Whether the primary lesion is really limited to the breast is difficult, if not impossible, to prove; however, the converse provides us with a relatively easy, rapid, inexpensive, and dependable method of judging the patient's course.

Although Monroe4 was able to relate better five-year results to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Atlanta; New York

Former Assistant Resident, Pathology, The Roosevelt Hospital, New York, and Fellow in Surgery, Memorial Center for Cancer and Allied Diseases, New York (Dr. Perkinson); Attending Pathologist and Director of Laboratories, The Roosevelt Hospital, (Dr. Brandes); Former Resident, Pathology, The Roosevelt Hospital, New York; at present, Resident, Surgical Pathology, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center (Dr. Shepard).


Footnotes

Recorded for publication June 11, 1956.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.