You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 74 No. 1, January 1957 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers Presented at the Fourth Scientific Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Society of Angiology, Chicago, June 9, 1956
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effects of Intra-Arterial Injection of Iodine Contrast Media on the Kidney of the Dog

HARRY S. THOMSON, M.D.; GEORGE MARGOLIS, M.D.; KEITH S. GRIMSON, M.D.; HAYWOOD M. TAYLOR, Ph.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1957;74(1):39-49.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The literature pertaining to the development of aortography and to the occasional occurrence of serious injury of the spinal cord, mesenteric circulation, or kidneys has been referred to in previous reports from our laboratories1,2 and has been reviewed more recently by McAfee and Willson.3 Many authors emphasize the potential toxicity of contrast media to the kidney and the spinal cord. Our first report described an experimental method for producing injury of the spinal cord in dogs and compared the toxicity of two contrast media. Studies have continued in dogs in an attempt to standardize a similar technique for producing injury of a kidney. Idbohrn and Berg4 have investigated injury of the rabbit's kidney by intra-arterial injection of contrast media and have reviewed earlier literature on experimental renal injury.

In our first study two contrast media were compared, sodium acetrizoate (Urokon Sodium) and iodopyracet (Diodrast). In the present . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Durham, N. C.

From the Departments of Surgery, Pathology, and Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication July 20, 1956.

Acetrizoate and diprotrizoate were furnished by Mallinckrodt Chemical Works; iodopyracet and ditrizoate, by Winthrop-Stearns, Inc.

Presented at the Fourth Scientific Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Society of Angiology, Chicago, June 9, 1956.

This investigation was supported by a research grant (G-869) from the Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1957 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.