This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (4)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Willard E. Goodwin, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1957;74(2):294-296.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In a paper which must give pause to all advocates of translumbar aortography, Conger, Reardon, and Arey report a case of uremic death with hemorrhagic diathesis, following diagnostic translumbar aortography in a 12-year-old child with hypertension. One can certainly sympathize with their statement, "Deaths due to diagnostic procedures are among the worst medical tragedies."

They carefully review the literature and tabulate a total of eight "renal" deaths and a number of other nonfatal renal complications following this procedure. They conclude, "In view of its proven nephrotoxic effect in many reported cases, renal angiography should not be used in the diagnosis of renal disease."

Although one instinctively sympathizes with the tragedy of their reported case, it seems too great a reaction to condemn a procedure which has proved diagnostic usefulness and which has been performed many thousands of times in skilled hands without the complications they observed.^1,3,7

From the very . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
University of California Medical Center, Los Angeles.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?