You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 74 No. 5, May 1957 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers Read at Sixty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Cincinnati, Nov. 29, 30, and Dec. 1, 1956
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Billroth I and Billroth II Operations

Comparison of Results Six to Ten Years After Operation for Gastric, Duodenal, and Gastrojejunal Ulcers

WALTMAN WALTERS, M.D.; THOMAS E. LYNN, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1957;74(5):680-685.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

For this study we traced 729 patients (610 men and 119 women) who had undergone gastric resection of the Billroth II type for peptic ulcer 6 to 10 years previously at the Mayo Clinic. In our previously reported long-term follow-up study of the Billroth I operation for peptic ulcer, 185 patients (139 men and 46 women) were followed for 6 to 10 years. We shall contrast the results in the Billroth I series with the results in the Billroth II series reported in this paper. The average amount of stomach resected approximated two-thirds in both series.

Material and Follow-Up

Review of records of alternate patients who underwent a Billroth II operation for peptic ulcer in the years 1945 through 1949 provided 896 cases for this study. Follow-up data were collected by means of questionnaires sent or recent evaluation at the clinic. Follow-up data were available on 729 patients. Of the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn.

From the Section of Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota. Fellow in Surgery, Mayo Foundation (Dr. Lynn).


Footnotes

Read at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Cincinnati, Nov. 29, 1956.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1957 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.