You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 74 No. 6, June 1957 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers Read at Sixty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Cincinnati, Nov. 29, 30, and Dec. 1, 1956
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (61)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Local Recurrence of Carcinoma After Anterior Resection of the Rectum and the Sigmoid

Relationship with the Length of Normal Mucosa Excised Distal to the Lesion

ERIC P. LOFGREN, M.D.; JOHN M. WAUGH, M.D.; MALCOLM B. DOCKERTY, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1957;74(6):825-838.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In the field of surgery for cancer there is scarcely anything as discouraging as the specter of local recurrence after operation. Metastases to lymph nodes and other distant foci can be looked upon as "visitations" which are more or less beyond human control. The local reappearance of a tumor in the region of an operative site, on the other hand, possibly implies that certain sins of omission or commission were perpetrated.

In respect to operations for cancer of the rectum and sigmoid, local recurrences which follow the operation of combined abdominoperineal resection are diagnosed so late that little can be accomplished by reexaminations, as shown by Wangensteen and associates.41 In the case of anterior resection, by contrast, proper use of the proctoscope in the postoperative reexamination may disclose recurrent lesions while they are still removable.

But the aim of the surgeon is to prevent, rather than to treat, recurrences, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn.

Fellow in Surgery, Mayo Foundation (Dr. Lofgren). Section of Surgery (Dr. Waugh) and the Section of Surgical Pathology (Dr. Dockerty), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.


Footnotes

Read at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Cincinnati, Nov. 30, 1956.

Abridgment of thesis submitted by Dr. Lofgren to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Surgery.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1957 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.