You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 79 No. 6, December 1959 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aortic Dissection Due to Translumbar Aortography, with Recovery Following Surgery

TIMOTHY TAKARO, M.D.; E. D. PEASLEY, M.D.; M. F. McKEEL, M.D.; J. L. WILKERSON, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1959;79(6):1023-1027.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Renal and neurological complications are the commonest serious sequelae of abdominal aortography. It has become increasingly evident that in some cases these occasionally fatal complications have been brought about by aortic mural dissection following the injection of dye, with partial or complete occlusion of aortic branch vessels. That this sequence of events can occur was strongly suspected by Gaylis and Laws,1 who produced medial dissection experimentally in human abdominal aortas. However, McAfee,2 in a review of data on over 12,000 aortograms, was able to collect only two cases of dissection following aortography, both of which ended fatally. On the other hand, Wolfman and Boblitt3 reported four fatal cases from a series of 302 aortograms. In two of these the dissection directly contributed to the death. Fineberg and his associates4 described a case of gangrene of the large intestine believed to have resulted from this mechanism.

Since . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Oteen, N.C.

From the Veterans Administration Hospital, Oteen, N.C.


Footnotes

Received for publication May 29, 1959.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1959 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.