You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 80 No. 3, March 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Primary Carcinoma of the Cystic Duct

Report of Two Cases

JACOB RABINOVITCH, M.D., C.M.; MYRON ARLEN, M.D.; DAVID GRAYZEL, M.D., Ph.D.; MARVIN ROBERTS, M.D.; PHINEAS RABINOVITCH, M.D., C.M.

AMA Arch Surg. 1960;80(3):424-433.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

If we may judge from the reports in the literature, of which there are only a few authentic cases, primary carcinoma of the cystic duct is extremely rare. This tumor may be considered especially rare when compared with carcinoma of the gallbladder and of the hepatic and common bile ducts. The rarity of this neoplasm has been pointed out by most authors writing on the subject. Few cases, indeed, occur in the surgical experience of one person, and these are usually published as isolated case reports. For this reason, also, statistical studies on the frequency of occurrence of this lesion are in most instances inaccurate.

The occasional observation at operation or autopsy of a carcinoma of the cystic duct may evoke little comment or surgical curiosity. Such tumors are sometimes reported by the surgeon or pathologist as an afterthought, as though they were of no surgical or pathological significance, and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Brooklyn

From the Departments of Surgery and Laboratories, the Jewish Hospital of Brooklyn, and the Mount Royal Hospital, Montreal.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication June 8, 1959.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.