You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 80 No. 3, March 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Alcohol-Preserved Homografts

Long-Term Results in Three Cases

FRED J. WOLMA, Jr., M.D.; JOHN B. LYNCH, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1960;80(3):468-472.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

Kimoto et al.1 were among the first to point out the feasibility of the clinical application of alcohol-preserved homografts. They reported three cases in which the homografts used were preserved in pure alcohol and three cases in which the homografts used were preserved in 70% alcohol. Two cases of aortic aneurysm treated by resection and grafting, with use of aortic homografts preserved in alcohol were reported. One of the aortic grafts had been followed for a period of one year, the other for a period of only three months.

At the present time, vascular prostheses made of synthetic materials are preferable to homografts; however, aortic homografts do have certain advantages. The visceral branches, such as the renals, superior mesenteric, and celiac axis, are present. Also, homografts are technically easier to handle. The disadvantages associated with the use of homografts have been enumerated, and they are (1) difficulty in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Galveston, Texas

The University of Texas Medical Branch.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug. 14, 1959.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.