You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 81 No. 5, November 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gastric Vagotomy vs. Total Abdominal Vagotomy

CHARLES A. GRIFFITH, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1960;81(5):781-788.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

Conventional techniques of vagotomy represent a total abdominal vagotomy that disrupts the entire parasympathetic innervation to all abdominal viscera supplied by the vagus nerves—i.e., the stomach, small intestine, proximal colon, liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. The anatomic distribution of vagal fibers, however, permits a selective gastric vagotomy that confines vagal denervation to the stomach with preservation of vagal innervation to other abdominal viscera. Results of preliminary experimental studies have indicated the anatomic and technical feasibility of this procedure (Griffith and Harkins, 1957). This report concerns initial clinical experience.

Rationale of Gastric Vagotomy: Postvagotomy Sequelae

In evaluating the variable undesirable symptoms that may follow total abdominal vagotomy, attention has focused primarily upon the flaccid achlorhydric stomach, and all efforts have been directed towards relieving gastric stasis. These efforts have been rewarding in that improved techniques of gastrojejunostomy (Oberhelman and Dragstedt, 1955), pyloroplasty (Wilkins et al., 1954), and hemigastrectomy (Farmer et . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Bellevue, Wash.

Assistant in Surgery, and Clinical Associate in Anatomy.; From the Department of Surgery (Dr. Henry N. Harkins, Professor and Executive Officer), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication May 6, 1960.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.