You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 82 No. 1, January 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Strictures of the Bile Ducts

Etiology, Prevention, and Management

HARWELL WILSON, M.D.; EDWARD H. STORER, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1961;82(1):171-174.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Stricture of the common bile duct is generally considered to be one of the most serious lesions encountered by the general surgeon. The successful management of such lesions requires a degree of surgical judgment, technical skill, and ingenuity which is greater than that necessary for the successful management of many intra-abdominal conditions. Because of the serious nature of such strictures, all surgeons should be acquainted with the cause, prevention, and methods of correction of this condition.

Pancreatitis, penetrating postbulbar ulcer, congenital narrowing of the duct, erosion by stone, choledochal cyst, and similar conditions (excluding fibrosis of the sphincter of Oddi) probably account for less than 10% of all benign bile duct strictures. The great majority of bile duct strictures follow biliary surgery.

Anatomic variability and anomalies of the ducts and vessels in the right upper quadrant make cholecystectomy a potentially hazardous procedure. Inadequate exposure, failure to visualize all important structures, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MEMPHIS

From the Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis, the City of Memphis Hospitals and the Baptist Memorial Hospital.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Sept. 15, 1960.

Presented as a Scientific Exhibit, Section on General Surgery, at the 109th Annual Meeting of the American Medical Association, Miami Beach, June 13-17, 1960.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.