You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 82 No. 5, May 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Anaphylactic-Like Reactions

A Complicating Factor in Experimental Extracorporeal Circulation

STANLEY GIANNELLI, JR., M.D.; D. RAJ MAHAJAN, M.D.; J. ROBERT NAVARRE, M.D.; GERALD H. PRATT, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1961;82(5):713-718.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In a previous article, it was shown that marked splanchnic congestion, with uptake of blood from the extracorporeal circuit, usually occurred during experimental cardiopulmonary bypass perfusions.7 This paper presents our subsequent findings, showing that the above are part of an anaphylacticlike reaction to the homologous canine blood, used for priming the pump oxygenator. No red-cell isoagglutinins could be demonstrated, suggesting that the reactions were due to plasma incompatibility.

General Methods

The methods employed have already been described in detail.7 In brief, a Kay-Cross disk oxygenator and Sigmamotor pump were employed, with 100% oxygen as the oxygenating gas. The perfusions were carried out upon a scale in such a manner that an increase in weight represented the net transfer of blood from the extracorporeal circuit to the dog. Vascular pressures were monitored with U-tube manometers. Venous return was accomplished by gravity drainage. Crossmatching employed 2 drops of the recipient's . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK

Attending Surgeon, in Charge, Cardiovascular Surgery (Dr. Pratt).; From the Surgical Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, St. Vincent's Hospital.


Footnotes

Received for publication Dec. 27, 1960.

Presented in part before the New York Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, Feb. 15, 1960.

This work was made possible by a research grant-in-aid from the New York Heart Association.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.