This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (18)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

DAN W. ELLIOTT, M.D.; ROGER D. WILLIAMS, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1961;83(1):130-137.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Some recent reports indicate that faith in the diagnostic value of serum amylase determinations has been misplaced.^1,2 Many disorders have been associated with very high amylase levels. Some of the more common in addition to acute pancreatitis include mumps, renal disease, and hepatitis,³ as well as intestinal obstruction and perforated ulcer.^1,4,5 Some of these lesions require early surgery, whereas acute pancreatitis is usually treated without operation. As a result, serious errors in management have occurred. Consequently, a comprehensive review of a complete clinical experience with this test seems appropriate.

Serum amylase determinations have been given much emphasis in the diagnosis of the acute abdomen at the University Hospital. It has been a policy to obtain blood immediately for this determination in every patient with upper abdominal pain, night or day, before any narcotics are given. As a result, 11,377 serum amylase determinations were recorded in a period . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
COLUMBUS, OHIO

From the Department of Surgery, Ohio State University School of Medicine.

Footnotes
Aided by Research Grant No. A-4116, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

This paper was read at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Detroit, Dec. 3, 1960.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?