You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 83 No. 1, July 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers Read at the Sixty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Detroit, December 1, 2, and 3, 1960
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Surgical Mortality of Massive Hemorrhage from Peptic Ulcer

JOSEPH C. DARIN, M.D.; MICHAEL A. POLACEK, M.D.; EDWIN H. ELLISON, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1961;83(1):55-66.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The problem of massive gastroduodenal hemorrhage, especially from benign peptic ulceration, has been difficult to analyze because of variable statistics and methods of reporting from different centers. Confusion exists because of different modes of therapy, different types of hemorrhage, and different types of patients treated at these various centers. Although the criteria for the definition of massive hemorrhage as outlined by Stewart1,2 has aided the evaluation of different reports, there still exists a problem in evaluating results, because one cannot ascertain if these patients undergoing emergency surgery are actively bleeding at the time of surgical intervention. The surgical mortality rate in those cases in which active bleeding is present is significantly higher than in patients undergoing urgent surgery for a recent massive hemorrhage.3 No one will disagree that the mortality rate will be lower if the bleeding has subsided at the time of surgery. Gardner and Baronofsky3 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MILWAUKEE

From the Divisions of Surgery, Marquette University School of Medicine, and Wood Veterans Administration Hospital, Milwaukee.


Footnotes

This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant No. A-4150.

This paper was read at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Detroit, Dec. 2, 1960.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.