You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 83 No. 6, December 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of Fibrinolysin in Experimental Inferior Vena Caval Replacement

ANTONIO DEMETZ, M.D.; LOUISE L. PHILIPS, Ph.D.; DAVID V. HABIF, M.D.; JULIUS H. JACOBSON, II, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1961;83(6):883-886.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Replacement of venous segments remains one of the unsolved problems in vascular surgery. In most instances, the failure is due to thrombotic occlusion of the graft, with the thrombosis originating at the suture line.4

This project was carried out in order to determine the value of fibrinolysin in the prevention of thrombotic occlusion of the inferior vena cava. Venous autografts and various prosthetic materials were compared in both control and test groups because these represent extremes of success and failure in venous replacement.

Bryant2 reports 8 of 10 successful venous autografts used for inferior vena caval replacement. He had no success when using freeze-dried arterial homografts, freeze-dried venous homografts, and a variety of prosthetic grafts. Egdahl5 reports no success with Orlon prostheses. Much work has been done on superior vena caval replacement. Results are conflicting,4 but, in general, fresh venous autografts are most successful, venous and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW YORK; BURLINGTON, VT.

From the Departments of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, and the University of Vermont, College of Medicine.


Footnotes

Received for publication March 10, 1961.

This investigation was supported in part by a U.S. Public Health Service Research Grant H-1512-C6 and U.S. Public Health Service Research Grant H-5158 from the National Heart Institute.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.