You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 85 No. 3, September 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Incidental Appendectomy in Gallbladder Surgery

LCDR CLINTON H. LOWERY, MC; CAPT. HARRY F. LENHARDT, MC

AMA Arch Surg. 1962;85(3):476-479.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Among surgeons, the opinion regarding the advisability of incidental appendectomy as a routine procedure during other intra-abdominal operations is diverse. Many surgeons are dogmatic in their stand for or against, while others vary depending upon the circumstances in the individual case.

Allen1 is of the opinion that incidental appendectomy should not only be considered as an elective procedure but also as a prophylactic one. He favors removal of the normal appendix in the course of another operation provided that appendectomy can be performed through the incision already in use, if the patient's general health and operative condition are good, and if, in the surgeon's judgment, the procedure can be performed without threat, including wound soilage.

Recent literature favors incidental appendectomy as a routine procedure, especially during gynecological and obstetrical surgery.2-4 Taniguchi and Kilkenny2 reviewed a series of 532 appendices removed incidental to other pelvic surgery in women. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

USN; USN

U.S. Naval Hospital, Portsmouth, Va. (LCDR Lowery); Chief of Surgery, U.S. Naval Hospital, Portsmouth, Va., and Fellow, American College of Surgeons (Capt. Lenhardt).


Footnotes

Received for publication Nov. 24, 1961.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Navy Department or of the Naval Service at large.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1962 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.