You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 86 No. 4, April 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Comparison of Halothane (Fluothane) and Chloroform

ENOCH C. McREYNOLDS, M.D.; ALAN THOROGOOD, M.B., B.S.; LUCIEN E. MORRIS, M.D.

AMA Arch Surg. 1963;86(4):633-640.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In 1956 Raventós reported an investigation of the pharmacologic behavior of a fluorinated hydrocarbon (2 bromo-2 chloro-1, 1, 1-trifluoroethane) which was found to be a potent inhalation anesthetic.1 The first clinical trials reported by Johnstone,2 Bryce-Smith, and O'Brien3 were quickly followed by further favorable reports.4-8 Since then this agent, halothane (Fluothane), has been both enthusiastically received as a clinical anesthetic and subjected to extensive laboratory and clinical investigation.9 Although one of the advantages of halothane is its nonflammability, inhalation anesthetic agents with which it has been commonly compared clinically are ether and cyclopropane, both of which are flammable and explosive, thereby limiting their comparable use under some conditions. Since their physical characteristics are quite different from halothane, dissimilar means of administration are usually used. Pharmacologic effects are also quite diverse. Chloroform, on the other hand, is a most logical agent for clinical comparison with . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SEATTLE

Present address: Bristol, Tenn. (Dr. McReynolds); now Consultant Anesthetist, Colchester, England (Dr. Thorogood); Director of Anesthesia Research Laboratories, Providence Hospital, Seattle (Dr. Morris).; Department of Anesthesia, King County Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Nov. 19, 1962.

Supported in part by a grant from the Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization. The Fluothane was supplied by Ayerst Laboratories.

This is an unevaluated report made under an Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization contract and distributed for information purposes. Contents do not necessarily reflect OCDM policy.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.