You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 87 No. 2, August 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"Directional" Flow Patterns in Portal Hypertension

Assessment by Spleen Pressure and Percutaneous Splenoportography

FRANCIS C. JACKSON, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1963;87(2):307-319.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

If a portacaval shunt is to be considered satisfactory treatment in the prevention of hemorrhage from gastroesophageal varices, it should be offered a cirrhotic patient with intrahepatic obstruction of portal blood flow and a functioning coronary vein visualized by splenoportography. The value of the prophylactic shunt would depend upon the significance of the coronary vein to bleeding varices.

The importance of such a consideration was suggested early in our experience. Studies on three cirrhotic patients indicated that a clinical significance may be attached to the first collateral channels, or branches of the splenic vein, filling with dye during these venographic studies, particularly, the prompt opacification of the coronary vein.

In one patient (Fig 1A) with frequent hemorrhages from varices, a large coronary vein represented the only venous channel providing a route for portosomatic blood flow. In a second instance (Fig 1B), the only vein so functioning was a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

PITTSBURGH

From the Veterans Administration Hospital, Pittsburgh, and the Department of Surgery of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Chicago, Feb 21-23, 1963.

A portion of this investigation was supported by a Cooperative Study of Gastroesophageal Varices being conducted by the Veterans Administration, departments of medicine and surgery.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.