You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 87 No. 5, November 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Iron Metabolism After Portacaval Shunt in Dogs

CAPT R. C. DOBERNECK, MC; CAPT DANIEL B. NUNN, MC; CAPT DALE G. JOHNSON, MC; B. K. CHUN, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1963;87(5):751-756.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Recent reports suggest that iron metabolism is altered after surgically induced portacaval shunting in patients with cirrhosis. These reports show that after such shunting extensive parenchymal deposition of stainable iron takes place.1,4-8 Other reports clearly show that such iron deposition occurs in the absence of surgically induced portacaval shunting in patients with cirrhosis3 and consequently the exact role played by the shunt remains unknown. This study was made to elucidate the role of the portacaval shunt in the metabolism of iron.

Method

Seventeen healthy adult dogs underwent liver biopsy and construction of an end-to-side portacaval shunt.* All animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium, 25 mg/kg of body weight. The portal vein was divided on the hepatic side of the entry of the cephalic gastroduodenal vein into the portal system so that the entire portal blood flow was diverted into the inferior vena cava. The dogs were followed for . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

USAR; USAR; USAR; MINNEAPOLIS

From the Department of Experimental Surgery, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington 12, DC.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 6, 1963.

The illustrations are US Army Photographs (ANWSO).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.