You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 87 No. 5, November 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of Three Mechanical Ventilators

Effects on Pulmonary Blood Flow

KHLAR E. McDONALD, MD; CAPT FRANK A. CAMP, USAF (MC); WORTHINGTON G. SCHENK, JR., MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1963;87(5):796-800.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The effect of mechanical ventilation on pulmonary blood flow has both experimental and clinical implications. Most major surgical procedures are currently being done while using mechanical ventilation. Experimental plans often require thoracotomy and, hence, mechanical ventilation.

This study was aimed at evaluating alterations in pulmonary blood flow resulting from ventilation with three commonly used mechanical ventilators.

Methods

Eleven mongrel dogs weighing from 10.9 to 21.31 kg were studied under light intravenous sodium pentobarbital (12 mg/kg) anesthesia. Each animal was intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube, and mechanical ventilation with room air was accomlished by one of three ventilators: a) intermittent positive-negative piston type (Jefferson*), b) continuous positive pressure operated diaphragm (pneophore{dagger}), or c) positive-negative pressure operated diaphragm (anesthetizer-vaporizer-resuscitator, [A-V-R] {ddagger}). Polyethylene catheters of identical dimensions were placed in a peripheral artery, the pulmonary artery, and the left atrial appendage. From these, arterial pressure and pulmonary artery less atrial differential pressure . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BUFFALO

Buswell Fellow in Surgical Research (Dr. Schenk).; From the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine of the State University of New York at Buffalo and the Edward J. Meyer Memorial Hospital.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 15, 1963.

Supported by grants-in-aid from the United States Public Health Service H-3181 and the Heart Association of Erie County.

The contents reflect the opinions of the author and are not to be construed as official Air Force Policy.

Animals used in these experiments were treated in accordance with the rules regarding animal care established by the American Medical Association.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.