You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 88 No. 1, January 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Papers Read Before the Eleventh Scientific Meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, North American Chapter, Atlantic City, NJ June 15, 1963
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Limb Replantation

I. The Technique and Immediate Results

ODDVAR EIKEN, MD; DONALD C. NABSETH, MD; RICHARD F. MAYER, MD; RALPH A. DETERLING, JR., MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1964;88(1):48-53.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The efforts of surgeons to salvage and reimplant severed or traumatically amputated extremities date far back in time. In 1903, Hoepfner, in performing experiments on arterial anastomoses, transected and reimplanted a series of dogs' limbs without dividing the bone, sciatic nerve, or femoral vein. Thrombosis of the artery under these conditions led to a high incidence of gangrene.1 Carrel and Guthrie continued these studies with thoughts of human extremity transplantations.2

Although various techniques for limb transplantation have been used by several investigators during the study of vascular anastomoses, grafts, and survival of ischemic tissue, publications dealing with the reimplantation of totally amputated extremities are extremely limited. Lapchinsky reported excellent long-term results after immediate replantation of autogenous canine hind limbs amputated at midthigh level, as well as successful restoration of limb function after 28 hours of storage.3 Snyder also reported successful replantation of canine hind limbs, using a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BOSTON

Research Fellow of the Gustavus and Louise Pfeiffer Research Foundation (Dr. Eiken).; From the Department of Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, and the First (Tufts) Surgical Service, Boston City Hospital.


Footnotes

Read before the 11th Scientific Meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, North American Chapter, Atlantic City, NJ, June 15, 1963.

This work was supported by United States Public Health grant C-5374.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.