You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 88 No. 4, April 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intravenous Cholangiography in Acute Cholecystitis

Use in Differential Diagnosis

O. BREWSTER HARRINGTON, MD; ARTHUR C. BEALL, JR., MD; GEORGE NOON, MD; MICHAEL E. DeBAKEY, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1964;88(4):585-589.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis usually can be established firmly on the basis of an accurate history and physical examination and routine laboratory studies. Occasionally, however, typical findings may lead to errors in diagnosis. In other cases the exact cause of upper abdominal pain may remain in doubt after completion of the routine diagnostic evaluation.

Intravenous cholangiography has become a well-established diagnostic procedure for the detection of biliary tract disease.1-5 In an attempt to confirm the usefulness and determine the accuracy of this procedure as an aid in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain, case records were reviewed of 211 consecutive patients in whom intravenous cholangiography was employed in the emergency room of the city-county charity hospitals of Houston and Harris County, Texas. Final diagnoses were established either by operative removal of the diseased tissue and pathological examination, or, as was the case with illnesses not requiring surgical intervention, adequate . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

HOUSTON, TEX

From the Cora and Webb Mading Department of Surgery, Baylor University College of Medicine, and the Jefferson Davis and Ben Taub General Hospitals.


Footnotes

Read before the 71st Annual Session of the Western Surgical Association, Galveston, Tex, Nov 21-23, 1963.

Supported in part by the United States Public Health Service (HE-03137 and HE-05387).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.