You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 89 No. 1, July 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Rebound Hyperacidity After Gastric Freezing

Clinical Study of Treatment for Duodenal Ulcer

R. DUNCAN SUTHERLAND, MD; JAMES E. BITTER, MD; CLAUDE R. HITCHCOCK, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1964;89(1):208-214.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Gastric freezing for control of the duodenal ulcer diathesis has been evaluated for 15 months at the Hennepin County General Hospital.* Our continuing clinical study aims to determine the possible prolonged effectiveness of this therapy. This report deals with 173 patients who have undergone a single gastric freeze, and 49 of the same patients who have been treated a second time. The duration of symptoms in these subjects has been from two months (one patient) to 47 years, and the average time has been ten years. All patients were referred by private physicians and had a documented duodenal ulcer prior to admission to our hospital.

Procedure

The gastric freezing procedure used in this series is the standard 50-minute gastric freeze using the Swenko hypothermia machine and the pioneer D-2 rubber balloon, with an average inflow temperature of –18 C (–0.4 F) and an average return temperature of –11 C (12.2 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MINNEAPOLIS


Footnotes

Read before the 21st Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Rochester, Minn, Feb 27-29, 1964.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.