You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 89 No. 1, July 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (51)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Technique of Renal Homotransplantation

Experience With 42 Cases

THOMAS E. STARZL, MD; THOMAS L. MARCHIORO, MD; THEODORE C. DICKINSON, MD; DAVID RIFKIND, MD; OLIVER G. STONINGTON, MD; WILLIAM R. WADDELL, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1964;89(1):87-104.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Purely technical considerations play an important role in successful renal homotransplantation. Minimization of homograft ischemia is critical. Additional important factors involve the site of placement of the homograft, provision for unkinked vascular channels, selection of a method of ureteroneocystostomy which permits early removal of the urethral catheter, and use of a one-stage operation incorporating bilateral nephrectomy and splenectomy in addition to homotransplantation.

In the present study, the methods used to meet these purely surgical requirements will be described as they have evolved in the course of caring for the first 42 patients treated with renal homografts from living donors. Consideration will not be given to patients receiving cadaveric kidneys1 or two who received homografts from identical twins,2 since the circumstances in such cases are different than those which obtained with our major experience.

The prerequisites and techniques of the donor operation have recently been fully documented by Marchioro . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

DENVER

Markle Scholar (Dr. Starzl).; From the departments of surgery and medicine, University of Colorado Medical Center and Veterans Administration Hospital.


Footnotes

Read before the 21st Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Rochester, Minn, Feb 27-29, 1964.

Aided by grants A-6283, A-6344, HE 07735, AM 07772, AI041542, and OG 27 from the United States Public Health Service.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.