You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 89 No. 2, August 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Circulating "Cancer Cells"

Clinical Significance

NORMAN C. DELARUE, BA, MD, MS (TOR.), FRCS (C), FACS, FCCP; NEIL WATTERS, MD, FRCS (C); W. E. ANDERSON, MD; DONALD THOMPSON, MD; T. C. BROWN, MD, FACP; R. E. FALK, MD; G. S. LANSKY, MD; R. H. N. FIELDEN, MD; G. LAU, MD; DONALD STEELE, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1964;89(2):392-398.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Many students of the problem have been puzzled and fascinated by the possible pathological and clinical significance of certain cells found to be circulating in the peripheral blood of patients known to harbour malignant diseases of infinite variety. Theoretical and practical aspects of this matter have been discussed previously.1

Almost every facet of these studies remains to date open to doubt and conjecture. These doubts revolve not only around the frequency2-7 with which such cells can be recovered but are expressed also concerning their pathological identification2,4,8,9 and consequently their prognostic implications.

The variation in frequency can logically be related to the fortuitous timing of the samplings and their small volume, and can also be explained partially on the more factual bases of differences in the technique of recovery on cytological examination and the nature and extent of the specific diseases under study. Not only is the volume . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

TORONTO

Department of Surgery (Dr. Delarue), pathologist (Drs. Anderson and Thompson), Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation Fellow, Department of Surgery (Drs. Falk, Lansky, Fielden, Lau, and Steele), Toronto General Hospital; Department of Surgery (Dr. Watters), pathologist (Dr. Brown), Wellesley Hospital.


Footnotes

Read before the 21st Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Rochester, Minn, Feb 27-29, 1964.

The Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation provided financial assistance, making possible the assignment of Fellows to this project for collecting the specimens, recording the clinical and pathological data, and maintaining the follow-up reports.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.