You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 89 No. 5, November 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Replacement of the Deep Veins of the Leg

RONALD J. BAIRD, MD; IRVING H. LIPTON, MD; ROBERT T. MIYAGISHIMA, MD; CLAUDE J. LABROSSE, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1964;89(5):797-805.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The many patients with chronically swollen and frequently ulcerated legs remain an eloquent testimony to the inadequacy of our present methods of treatment of the postphlebitic legs. The principles of vessel replacement which have been so effective in the surgical treatment of arterial insufficiency have usually been neglected and the modern principles of treatment of venous insufficiency are still mainly those of support, ligation, or excision.

Of the various materials with which surgeons have attempted to replace the veins of the leg, satisfactory patency rates and continued valve function have been achieved only with venous autografts. The reported patency rates with venous autografts in the femoral vein of the dog have varied widely but in general have been less than those achieved when the graft was used to replace veins of similar size in other areas such as the renal vein or jugular vein.1,2 DeWeese and Niguidula,3 and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

TORONTO

From the University of Toronto and the Cardiovascular Surgery Laboratory at the Banting Institute.


Footnotes

Read before the 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, North American Chapter, San Francisco, June 20, 1964.

Supported by an Ontario Heart Foundation grant.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.