You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 89 No. 5, November 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Late Results of Pericardiectomy

Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis

HAROLD A. COLLINS, MD; LEON P. WOODS, MD; ROLLIN A. DANIEL, JR., MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1964;89(5):921-928.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Chronic constrictive pericarditis, a debilitating and relentless form of cardiac compression, was one of the first cardiac lesions to excite serious surgical interest. Although the clinical and pathological characteristics of chronic constrictive pericarditis had previously been described by several individuals, Pick is credited with defining the symptom complex of "pericarditic pseudocirrhosis of the liver" due to latent pericarditis.17 Delorme apparently first conceived pericardiectomy for constriction in 1895 but was unable to employ the surgical concept.9 In a suprisingly contemporary and plaintive plea Delorme stated that he had been unable to apply the concept "despite repeated appeals to my colleagues of the medical services of the Val-de-Grace Hospital." The first successful operation for constrictive pericarditis was reported by Rehn in 1920, seven years after the operation had been performed.18 The evolution of surgical techniques for pericardiectomy gradually led to improved operative methods as well as enhanced diagnostic techniques. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NASHVILLE, TENN

From the Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.


Footnotes

Read before the 12th Scientific Meeting of the International Cardiovascular Society, North American Chapter, San Francisco, June 20, 1964.

Supported in part by USPHS Program grant HE-08195.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.