You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 91 No. 1, July 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Rational Approach to Management of Clinical Shock

Utilizing Light-Reflection Oximetry and Central Venous Pressure Monitoring

JOHN N. WILSON, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1965;91(1):92-120.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

WITH THE increasing magnitude and complexity of surgical procedures and the everrising incidence of severe trauma, restoration and maintenance of adequate circulation assume an increasingly important role in the surgeon's work.

Today, there are such excellent means of treating acute circulatory failure that relatively few patients will persist with refractory hypotension if the individual requirements of each patient are met with properly directed therapy. The chief problem in the management of shock is to identify accurately the circulatory defect present and thereby define the appropriate course of therapy. The greatest hazard to a patient's survival is not a lack of effective means of therapy but rather an inaccurate or uncertain diagnosis leading to inadequate treatment without benefit of available therapeutic resources.

One reason for this paradox is the general tendency to think of shock in terms of etiology with the implication that such a diagnosis indicates a particular corresponding program . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

DENVER

From the Department of Research, St. Joseph Hospital and the Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Medical Center.


Footnotes

Read before the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Milwaukee, March 4-6, 1965.

Reprint requests to 1835 Franklin St, Denver, Colo 80218.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.