You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 91 No. 2, August 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (72)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"Physiological" Repair for Hiatus Hernia—Manometric Study

J. F. LIND, MD, CM, FRCS (C), FACS; C. M. BURNS, MD, FRCS (C), FACS; J. T. MacDOUGALL, MD, CM, FRCS (EDIN), FRCS (C), FACS

AMA Arch Surg. 1965;91(2):233-237.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

V ARIOUS operations have been devised for the surgical treatment of reflux esophagitis associated with hiatus hernia. (Belsey1 has designed an operation in which the fundus of the stomach is wrapped around the distal esophagus.) Our studies on the mechanisms of the gastroesophageal sphincter in normal subjects and in patients with hiatus hernia suggested that the principle of this operation would lead to reconstitution of a normal sphincter mechanism at the gastroesophageal junction. This hypothesis was tested by studying the pressure characteristics of this region, before and after repair.

There have been previous studies on the pressure characteristics of this region in hiatus hernia.2-4 Our study demonstrated that hiatus hernia could be classified into two groups.4 In one group, the maximum pressure in the gastroesophageal sphincter was within normal limits and there was a normal sphincteric response to abdominal compression. These patients did not have endoscopic evidence . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

WINNIPEG MANITOBA, CANADA

From the Clinical Investigation Unit, Winnipeg General Hospital and the Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Markle Scholar in Academic Medicine (Dr. Lind).


Footnotes

Read before the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Milwaukee, March 4-6, 1965.

Reprint requests to University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (Dr. Lind).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.