You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 91 No. 5, November 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Regional Blood Flow During Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile Perfusion

I. MANDELBAUM, MD; J. BERRY, AB; M. SILBERT, AB; W. H. BURNS, MD; C. ROTHE, PhD

AMA Arch Surg. 1965;91(5):771-774.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

DIFFERENCES in response to pulsatile and nonpulsatile blood flow might be important during total cardiopulmonary bypass, assisted circulation, and with regard to implantable mechanical hearts.

In previous studies from this laboratory, nonpulsatile flow was found to be associated with increased systemic vascular resistance as compared with pulsatile flow.1 In the present investigation, renal, hepatic, and hind-limb flows were determined during total body pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion in dogs.

Method

1. Ten healthy mongrel dogs, each weighing 12 to 22 kg (26.4 to 48.4 lb) were anesthetized lightly with intravenous 5% thiopental (Pentothal). Adequate ventilation with oxygen was maintained by use of a mechanical respirator connected to an endotracheal tube. The animals were given 2 mg/kg sodium heparin. A polyethylene catheter was inserted into a femoral artery and another was placed in the left innominate vein through the left jugular vein. They were connected to individual strain gauges, and systemic . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

INDIANAPOLIS

From the departments of surgery and physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Read before the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Cardiovascular Society, New York, June 19, 1965.

Reprint requests to Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind 46207 (Dr. Mandelbaum).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.