This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (21)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Continuing Problem in Abdominal Surgery

EDWARD J. GUINEY, MCh, FRCS; PETER J MORRIS, FRCS; GORDON A. DONALDSON, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1966;92(1):47-51.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

ALTHOUGH a case of "burst abdomen" is an infrequent event in the life of any one surgeon, the result of this postoperative complication is often catastrophic. At the Massachusetts General Hospital, it is accompanied by a mortality rate of 15%. A yearly review of the increasing number of laparotomies performed on the ward and private services of the hospital reveals a disproportionate rise in the incidence of wound dehiscence over the past 15 years. In this paper, wound dehiscence describes the separation of all layers of the abdominal incision, including the peritoneum, after intra-abdominal surgery (Fig 1).

Wallace,¹ in an unpublished study at this hospital in 1945 covering the 16 years 1930 through 1945, found 137 wound dehiscences following 29,180 laparotomies, an incidence of one dehiscence in every 213 wounds (0.47%). At that time he made an attempt to distinguish the importance of the various factors affecting this complication. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
BOSTON

From the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, and General Surgical Service, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Sept 21, 1965.

Reprint requests to 275 Charles St, Suite 1104, Boston, Mass 02114 (Dr. Donaldson).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?