You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 92 No. 1, January 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Measured Subtotal Gastrectomy for Duodenal Ulcer

Size of Resection Versus Ulcer Control and Patient Rehabilitation

H. BROWNELL WHEELER, MD; CARL S. HOAR, JR., MD; LON E. CURTIS, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1966;92(1):52-57.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

DURING the past 30 years the most common operation for duodenal ulcer has been resection of the distal two thirds to three fourths of the stomach. This procedure, once the standard operation in peptic-ulcer surgery, is now being replaced in many hospitals by vagotomy combined with pyloroplasty or antrectomy. Operations eliminating vagal stimulation probably have a more elegant physiologic rationale to support them1-3; but the loss of enthusiasm for subtotal gastrectomy stems in large part from reports of high ulcer-recurrence rates, poor nutritional results, distressing postprandial symptoms, and relatively high operative morbidity and mortality figures.4-7 The incidence of such complications after subtotal gastrectomy is not uniform, however, and some authors have reported such good operative results that there would seem to be little room left for improvement in an elective procedure, regardless of its physiologic basis.8,9

It seems desirable to determine the reasons behind the disparity in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

WEST ROXBURY, MASS

From the departments of surgery, Veterans Administration Hospital, West Roxbury, and Harvard Medical School, Boston.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug 27, 1965.

Reprint requests to 1400 Veterans of Foreign Wars Pkwy, West Roxbury, Mass 02132 (Dr. Wheeler).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.