You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 92 No. 1, January 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fibromuscular Hyperplasia of the Renal Artery: An Enigma

CAPT DUNCAN A. McINTOSH, USAF (MC); MAJ JOHN J. McPHAUL, JR., USAF (MC); MAJ LESTER F. WILLIAMS, USAF (MC); MAJ EMIL J. GRITTI, USAF (MC)

AMA Arch Surg. 1966;92(1):60-64.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

FIBROMUSCULAR hyperplasia of the renal artery has emerged as a lesion of major importance in causation of renal vascular hypertension.1-4 It has received attention, primarily in the surgical literature,1,3,4 as a potentially curable lesion, occurring predominantly in young women.3

Pathologically, fibromuscular hyperplasia is unassociated with primary atheromatous disease and has been described as characteristically excluding the proximal third of the renal artery.2 The lesion is marked by proliferation of fibrous tissue and smooth muscle fibers, frequently associated with degeneration of elastic fibers, the end result being narrowing of the renal arterial lumen. Although it may present as a single area of stenosis, it frequently involves a considerable length of renal artery with alternate areas of atrophy and proliferation which give the artery a "beaded" appearance radiographically. Poststenotic dilatation may be marked. Diagnosis is suggested by the typical angiographic appearance5 (Fig 1, 2) and confirmed by . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SAN ANTONIO, TEX

From the departments of medicine and surgery, Wilford Hall USAF Hospital, Aerospace Medical Division (AFSC), Lackland Air Force Base.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication July 30, 1965.

Reprint requests to Renal Section, Department of Medicine, Wilford Hall USAF Hospital, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas (Capt McIntosh).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.