You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 92 No. 1, January 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Histopathology of Satellite Polyp

CLYDE E. CULP, MD; MALCOLM B. DOCKERTY, MDI; RAYMOND J. JACKMAN, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1966;92(1):65-70.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

NOT INFREQUENTLY, a carcinoma is associated with one or more "polyps" in the same segment of bowel that is visualized with the proctosigmoidoscope. Prompted by this observation, we undertook a study not only to evaluate the histologic character of the sentinel or satellite polyp (Fig 1) but also to ascertain whether there was a relationship between "polyp" and carcinoma that might shed some additional light on the controversial "adenoma-carcinoma" sequence.

The term "polyp" as used in this study refers to any protuberance, projection, excrescence, or mammillation above the mucosal surface of the rectum, rectosigmoid, or lower sigmoid that was visible to the naked eye.

Methods and Materials

Surgical specimen from segments of bowel resected during 1955 for adenocarcinoma (distal 25 cm) were selected. After specimens that were associated with ulcerative colitis or familial multiple polyposis were excluded, 180 were available for study. Review of these 180 surgical specimens revealed 49 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN

From the sections of proctology and surgical pathology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug 30, 1965.

Read before the meeting of the American Medical Association, Section on Proctology, New York, NY, June 21-25, 1965.

Reprint requests to Section of Publications, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 55902.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.