This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (56)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

B. M. RIGG, MBBS, FRCS; M. R. EWING, FRCS, FRCSE, FACS, FRACS

AMA Arch Surg. 1966;92(3):321-332.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN THE FIRST edition of his authoritative text on diseases of the colon (1923), Lockhart-Mummery¹ stated that "... while a history of a slight amount of (rectal) bleeding is common in cancer, it is usually absent in diverticulitis." This was the standard teaching at that time, and a history of bleeding, certainly in the presence of an obstructive lesion of the distal colon, was believed to be more strongly in favor of carcinoma than of diverticulitis. Further, diverticulitis did not readily come to mind as a likely diagnosis when a patient presented with unheralded hemorrhage in the absence of any obstructive symptoms.

How very different are the views current today. Noer and his colleagues (1962),² in an analysis of 245 patients who presented with rectal bleeding, decided that in 62 of these patients the cause was diverticulitis. Fallis and Marshall (1950)³ went so far as to say that . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
LONDON

From the Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.; After May 1, 1966, Dr. Rigg's address will be Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Oct 15, 1965.

Reprint requests to Nuffield College, Lincoln Inn Fields, London, W.C. 2, England (Dr. Rigg).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?