This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (15)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

P. J. MORRIS, MBBS (MELBOURNE), FRCS; B. A. BARNES, MD; J. F. BURKE, MD

AMA Arch Surg. 1966;92(3):367-370.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE DECREASE in the incidence of postoperative incisional sepsis following the adoption of the principles of Lister has not resulted in a further steady decline in this rate as techniques and an efficient sterilization technology were perfected. There has been no improvement in the incidence of sepsis after clean postoperative incisions over the past 20 years despite substantial efforts. It is hardly satisfying to describe the persistence of a low incidence of sepsis as an "irreducible minimum." This "irreducible" rate does not include the sporadic epidemics of postsurgical infections which on investigation can be shown to have an epidemiologic basis. It is the persistent, low, fluctuating rate which follows clean operations in healthy patients presenting year in and year out and which apparently characterizes individual clean operations as studied in several surgical centers.¹

No satisfactory explanation exists as to why 2% to 6% of healthy patients develop postoperative incisional . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
BOSTON

From the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, and the General Surgical Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Dec 6, 1965.

Reprint requests to General Surgical Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass 02114 (Dr. Burke).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?