You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 95 No. 3, September 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (59)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hemodynamic Patterns After Acute Anesthetized and Unanesthetized Trauma

Evaluation of the Sequence of Changes in Cardiac Output and Derived Calculations

William C. Shoemaker, MD; Kenneth J. Printen, MD; Joseph J. Amato, MD; David O. Monson, MD; Joseph S. Carey, MD; Kathleen O'Connor, RN

AMA Arch Surg. 1967;95(3):492-499.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE CARDIOVASCULAR derangements occurring with both hemorrhagic and traumatic shock were described over 20 years ago by Cournand, Richards and coworkers1,2 as decreased cardiac output and increased peripheral resistance. Since then there has been a tendency in some circles to assume that shock, irrespective of the precipitating events, is associated with low cardiac output and high resistance. More recently, however, other workers3-10 have described increased or no appreciable changes in cardiac output and decreased or no change in resistance in various types of clinical shock. The relatively small numbers of patients in the various reported series may account for these apparent discrepancies. An alternative explanation for these differences is that shock may represent a rather large waste basket of conditions, in which various factors play significant roles in producing one or more types of circulatory disturbances. Furthermore, it is entirely possible that patients who have sustained shock . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Chicago

From the Department of Surgical Research, Division of Surgery, Hektoen Institute for Medical Research, Cook County Hospital, and the University of Illinois, Chicago.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication March 15, 1967.

Read before the 24th annual meeting of the Central Surgical Association, Pittsburgh, Feb 24, 1967.

Reprint requests to 627 S Wood St, Chicago 60612 (Dr. Shoemaker).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1967 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.