You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 99 No. 6, December 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Mitral Valve Replacement With Stented Aortic Homograft

A Hemodynamic Evaluation

Robert W. Dunlap, MD; Robert L. Frye, MD; F. Henry Ellis, Jr, MD, PhD

AMA Arch Surg. 1969;99(6):821-824.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Extensive data are available defining the hemodynamic improvement that occurs when the mitral valve is replaced with a mechanical prosthetic device.1-6 Evaluation of long-term clinical results with these mechanical prosthetic devices, however, has revealed disturbingly high late morbidity and mortality from fatal or disabling thromboembolic complications.7,8 Because of these problems, interest developed in the use of the aortic valve homograft as a prosthesis for mitral valve replacement. It also was thought that hemodynamics in the immediate postoperative period might be better with a homograft than with a prosthesis if the presence of a cage and ball interfered with left ventricular performance. The present study, therefore, was undertaken to examine the hemodynamic state of ten patients in the immediate postoperative period after replacement of the mitral valve with a stented aortic valve homograft.

Material

Ten patients were studied before, on the first three days after, and nine days to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn

From the sections of medicine (Dr. Frye) and surgery (Dr. Ellis), Mayo Clinic and Foundation, and the Mayo Graduate School of Medicine (University of Minnesota) (Dr. Dunlap), Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Aug 5, 1969.

Read before the 17th scientific meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Cardiovascular Society, New York, July 12, 1969.

Reprint requests to Section of Publications, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, Minn 55901.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1969 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.