<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org">
<title>Archives of Surgery current issue</title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org</link>
<description>Archives of Surgery is an influential peer-reviewed monthly general surgery journal able to represent a full range of regional and specialty interests as the official publication of the New England Surgical Society, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, the Surgical Infection Society, and the Western Surgical Association.</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Nov  1 2009 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Surgery</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0004-0010</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/992?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/998?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1000?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1005?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1006?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1011?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1020?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1021?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1028?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1034?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1035?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1039?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1040?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1047?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1056?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1060?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1068?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1074?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1081?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1085?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1086?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1087?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1088?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1089?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif">
<title>Archives of Surgery</title>
<url>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif</url>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/992?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/992?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:29 PST</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>992</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>992</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Use of Bone-Morphogenetic Proteins for Spine Fusion Surgery Cost-effective? [From JAMA]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cardoso, M. J., Sciubba, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.185</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Use of Bone-Morphogenetic Proteins for Spine Fusion Surgery Cost-effective? [From JAMA]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>997</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From JAMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/998?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing Patients With Clinically Significant Cardiac and Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease [From the Archives]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/998?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perler, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Revascularization, Neurology, Cerebrovascular Disease, Cardiovascular System, Other, Stroke, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Cardiovascular Intervention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.182</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing Patients With Clinically Significant Cardiac and Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease [From the Archives]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>999</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>998</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From the Archives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1000?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonoperative Management of Patients With a Diagnosis of High-grade Small Bowel Obstruction by Computed Tomography [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1000?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the natural history and treatment of high-grade small bowel obstruction (HGSBO). Small bowel obstruction is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. Complete and strangulating obstructions are managed operatively while partial obstructions receive a trial of nonoperative therapy. The management and outcome of patients with HGSBO diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) has not been examined.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective medical record review. Outcomes for nonoperative vs operative management were analyzed using Fisher exact and log-rank tests.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary care referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> One thousand five hundred sixty-eight consecutive patients admitted from the emergency department with a diagnosis of small bowel obstruction between 2000 and 2005 by CT criteria.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Recurrence of symptoms and complications.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> One hundred forty-five patients (9%) with HGSBO were identified, with 88% follow-up (median, 332 days; range, 4-2067 days). Sixty-six (46%) were successfully managed nonoperatively while 79 (54%) required an operation. Length of stay and complications were significantly increased in the operative group (4.7 days vs 10.8 days and 3% vs 23%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Nonoperative management was associated with a higher recurrence rate (24% vs 9%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.005) and shorter time to recurrence (39 days vs 105 days; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.005) compared with operative intervention. Computed tomography signs of ischemia, admission laboratory results, and presence of cancer or inflammatory bowel disease were not predictive of an operation.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients with HGSBO by CT can be managed safely with nonoperative therapy; however, they have a significantly higher rate of recurrence requiring readmission or operation within 5 years.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocha, F. G., Theman, T. A., Matros, E., Ledbetter, S. M., Zinner, M. J., Ferzoco, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Functional Imaging, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, PET/ SPECT Imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.183</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonoperative Management of Patients With a Diagnosis of High-grade Small Bowel Obstruction by Computed Tomography [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1004</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1000</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1005?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Questioning the Small-Bowel Obstruction Paradigm [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1005?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pachter, H. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Functional Imaging, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, PET/ SPECT Imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.184</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Questioning the Small-Bowel Obstruction Paradigm [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1005</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1005</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1006?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Downwardly Mobile: The Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1006?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Given the pervasive evidence of disparities in screening, hospital admission, treatment, and outcomes due to insurance status, a disparity in outcomes in trauma patients (in-hospital death) among the uninsured may exist, despite preventive regulations (such as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Data were collected from the National Trauma Data Bank from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006 (version 7.0). We used multiple logistic regression to compare mortality rates by insurance status.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> The National Trauma Data Bank contains information from 2.7 million patients admitted for traumatic injury to more than 900 US trauma centers, including demographic data, medical history, injury severity, outcomes, and charges.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Data from patients (age, &ge;18 years; n&nbsp;=&nbsp;687&nbsp;091) with similar age, race, injury severity, sex, and injury mechanism were evaluated for differences in mortality by payer status.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> In-hospital death after blunt or penetrating traumatic injury.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Crude analysis revealed a higher mortality for uninsured patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.42; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Controlling for sex, race, age, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and injury mechanism (adjusted for clustering on hospital), uninsured patients had the highest mortality (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.61-2.02; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Subgroup analysis of young patients unlikely to have comorbidities revealed higher mortality for uninsured patients (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.66-2.15; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), as did subgroup analyses of patients with head injuries (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.42-1.90; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and patients with 1 or more comorbidities (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.30-1.78; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Uninsured Americans have a higher adjusted mortality rate after trauma. Treatment delay, different care (via receipt of fewer diagnostic tests), and decreased health literacy are possible mechanisms.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosen, H., Saleh, F., Lipsitz, S., Rogers, S. O., Gawande, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured, Medical Practice, Other, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Downwardly Mobile: The Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1011</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1006</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1011?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trauma of the Uninsured: Comment on "Downwardly Mobile: The Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1011?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eastman, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured, Medical Practice, Other, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trauma of the Uninsured: Comment on "Downwardly Mobile: The Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1012</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1011</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identification of Specific Quality Improvement Opportunities for the Elderly Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Specific complications occur more frequently in elderly patients undergoing major gastrointestinal (GI) tract operations that may represent opportunities for quality improvement.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective cohort study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> One hundred twenty-one hospitals participating in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Using the ACS-NSQIP participant use file (2005-2006), patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal tract (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;4115), hepatobiliary or pancreatic (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;3364), and colorectal (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;17&nbsp;268) operations at 121 hospitals were examined.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes were assessed using regression modeling adjusting for patient characteristics, comorbidities, and surgical procedures. The elderly were defined as those older than 75 years.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006, a total of 54&nbsp;747 patients who underwent major GI tract operations were identified from the ACS-NSQIP data file. In the elderly, overall perioperative morbidity was 1.2 to 2 times higher and mortality was 2.9 to 6.7 times higher than in younger patients after adjusting for differences in preoperative comorbidities. Irrespective of procedure type, the elderly were significantly more likely to experience cardiac (acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest), pulmonary (pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory failure), and urologic (urinary tract infection and renal failure) complications. However, surgical site infections, postoperative bleeding events, deep venous thromboses, and rates of return to the operating room did not differ significantly by age.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Morbidity and mortality are markedly higher in older patients. Quality measures for the elderly currently address only myocardial infarction, surgical site infection, and deep venous thrombosis. If care for the elderly is to be improved, quality improvement initiatives need to be expanded to include postoperative pulmonary and renal complications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bentrem, D. J., Cohen, M. E., Hynes, D. M., Ko, C. Y., Bilimoria, K. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identification of Specific Quality Improvement Opportunities for the Elderly Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1020</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1020?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surgery and Old Age: An Age Old Question [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1020?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthews, J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surgery and Old Age: An Age Old Question [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1020</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1020</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1021?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1021?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Clinical outcomes are increasingly subject to objective assessment and professional accountability. Informed consent relies on accurate estimation of operative risk. Current scoring systems for assessment of operative mortality after colorectal surgery (CRS) almost uniformly report 30-day mortality and may not represent true risk.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective cohort.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> All patients who underwent resections of the colon and/or rectum (as the principal operation) at a single hospital whose data are captured in the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VA-NSQIP) database from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Mortality at 30 days and 90 days.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The VA-NSQIP cohort included 186 patients who underwent CRS, including 148 patients who underwent elective procedures (79.6%) and 38 patients who underwent emergency procedures (20.4%). All but 8 patients were men, with a median age of 67 years (range, 26-92 years). Laparoscopic operations comprised 24.2% and open operations comprised 75.8%. Most (60.8%) were performed for neoplasms. The actual 30-day mortality rates (all, elective, and emergency procedures) were 4.3%, 1.4%, and 15.8%, respectively. These rates closely mirrored the calculated VA-NSQIP risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratio for 30-day mortality (4.8%, 1.8%, and 18.2%, respectively). However, mortality at 90 days increased substantially to 9.1%, 4.1%, and 28.9%, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The 30-day mortality significantly underreports the true risk of death after CRS. The 90-day mortality rate should be included as a standard outcome measure after CRS because it serves as a better estimation of risk for counseling patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Visser, B. C., Keegan, H., Martin, M., Wren, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1027</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1021</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1028?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside of the Operating Room [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1028?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To describe incorrect surgical procedures reported from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Medical Centers from 2001 to mid-2006 and provide proposed solutions for preventing such events.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Descriptive study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.</p>
<p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Veterans of the US Armed Forces.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> The VHA instituted an initial directive, "Ensuring Correct Surgery and Invasive Procedures," in January 2003. The directive was updated in 2004 to include non&ndash;operating room (OR) invasive procedures and incorporated requirements of The Joint Commission Universal Protocol for preventing wrong-site operations.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The categories included 5 incorrect event types (wrong patient, side, site, procedure, or implant), major or minor surgical procedures, location in or out of the OR, therapeutic or diagnostic events, adverse event or close call, inpatient or ambulatory events, specialty department, body segment, and severity and probability of harm.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> We reviewed 342 reported events (212 adverse events and 130 close calls). Of these, 108 adverse events (50.9%) occurred in an OR, and 104 (49.1%) occurred elsewhere. When examining adverse events only, ophthalmology and invasive radiology were the specialties associated with the most reports (45 [21.2%] each), whereas orthopedics was second to ophthalmology for number of reported adverse events occurring in the OR. Pulmonary medicine cases (such as wrong-side thoracentesis) and wrong-site cases (such as wrong spinal level) were associated with the most harm. The most common root cause of events was communication (21.0%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Incorrect ophthalmic and orthopedic surgical procedures appear to be overrepresented among adverse events occurring in ORs. Outside the OR, adverse events by invasive radiology were most frequently reported. Incorrect surgical procedures are not only an OR challenge but also a challenge for events occurring outside of the OR. We support earlier communication based on crew resource management to prevent surgical adverse events.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neily, J., Mills, P. D., Eldridge, N., Dunn, E. J., Samples, C., Turner, J. R., Revere, A., DePalma, R. G., Bagian, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Law and Medicine, Ophthalmology, Ophthalmological Procedures, Ophthalmological Procedures, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Radiography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside of the Operating Room [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1034</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1028</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1034?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient Safety Systems: A Long Way to Go [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1034?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Velmahos, G. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Law and Medicine, Ophthalmology, Ophthalmological Procedures, Ophthalmological Procedures, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Radiography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.1034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient Safety Systems: A Long Way to Go [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1034</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1034</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1035?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Single-Institution Experience With 25 Cases [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1035?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine treatment of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE), a rare vascular tumor with a variable course. Treatment modalities at our institution include liver resection, transplantation, and catheter-based therapies.</p>
<p><b>Design, Patients, and Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review of 25 patients treated for hepatic EHE (1976-2007). We examined treatment modality, overall survival, complications, and clinicopathologic characteristics.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of the 25 patients treated for hepatic EHE, 17 underwent liver transplantation (LT); 4, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE); 2, resection; and 2, TACE followed by LT. Twelve patients (48%) were male. The median age at diagnosis was 38 years (range, 9 months to 72 years). Mean overall survival was 167 (95% confidence interval [CI], 123-212) months, with 172 (124-220) months in the LT group and 83 (54-112) months in the TACE group. The 2 patients in the resection group remain alive after 19 and 71 months. The 2 patients treated with TACE followed by LT died after 13 and 113 months. Extrahepatic disease was identified as a predictor of outcome. Patients with extrahepatic disease treated with TACE fared better than those treated with surgical approaches (mean survival, 83.0 [95% CI, 54.2-111.8] vs 38.8 [23.7-53.8] months; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.12).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Hepatic EHE is a rare tumor that can be treated with surgical or nonsurgical approaches. In our experience, LT is used for patients with advanced local disease, whereas TACE is the primary modality when extrahepatic disease or comorbid conditions prohibiting LT are present. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-institution experience describing the various therapeutic modalities in the treatment of hepatic EHE.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cardinal, J., de Vera, M. E., Marsh, J. W., Steel, J. L., Geller, D. A., Fontes, P., Nalesnik, M., Gamblin, T. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Single-Institution Experience With 25 Cases [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1039</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1035</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1039?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Getting a Handlle on Managing Rare Tumors [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1039?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hebert, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Getting a Handlle on Managing Rare Tumors [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1039</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1039</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1040?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Splenic Salvage After Intraoperative Splenic Injury During Colectomy [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1040?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the optimal surgical management of splenic injury encountered during colectomy.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review from 1992 to 2007.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, a tertiary care center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A cohort of patients who sustained splenic injury during colectomy from 1992 to 2007.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Overall 30-day major morbidity and mortality and overall 5-year survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of 13&nbsp;897 colectomies, we identified 59 splenic injuries (0.42%). Of these, 33 (56%) were in men; there was a median age of 68 years (range, 30-93 years) and a median body mass index of 25.5 (range, 15-54). Thirty-seven injuries (63%) occurred during elective surgery, 6 (10%) occurred without splenic flexure mobilization, and 5 (8.4%) occurred during minimally invasive surgery. Injury was successfully managed by primary repair in 10 (17%), splenorrhaphy in 4 (7%), and splenectomy in 45 cases (76%). Four injuries (7%) were unrecognized and resulted in reoperation and splenectomy. Multiple attempts at splenic salvage were performed in 30 (51%); of these, 21 (70%) required splenectomy. More than 2 attempts at salvage was associated with splenectomy (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03). The 30-day major morbidity and mortality rates were 34% and 17%, respectively. Sepsis was the most common complication, with no confirmed episodes of postsplenectomy sepsis. Median survival after splenic injury was 7.25 years. There was no significant association between the surgical management of splenic injuries and short- or long-term outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Splenic injury is an infrequent but morbid complication. Splenic salvage is frequently unsuccessful; our data suggest that surgeons should not be reluctant to perform splenectomy when initial repair attempts fail.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holubar, S. D., Wang, J. K., Wolff, B. G., Nagorney, D. M., Dozois, E. J., Cima, R. R., O'Byrne, M. M., Qin, R., Larson, D. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.188</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Splenic Salvage After Intraoperative Splenic Injury During Colectomy [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1045</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1040</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1047?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Lessons Learned From 200 "Components Separation" Procedures [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1047?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To determine the efficacy and describe the evolution of the "components separation" technique for abdominal wall repair in 200 consecutive patients.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective medical record review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent ventral hernia repair using the components separation technique.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> Biological and permanent meshes were used in select patients to augment the repair of the midline fascial closure but were not used as "bridging" materials.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Hernia recurrence rates and major and minor complication rates for the overall series and for the different techniques.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Primary components separation (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;158) yielded a 22.8% recurrence rate. Closure of the midline tissues with augmentation of the repair using an acellular cadaveric dermis underlay (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;18) had a 33.3% recurrence rate requiring a second operation, whereas intra-abdominal soft polypropylene mesh (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;18) had 0% recurrence (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04). Elevated body mass index was a significant risk factor predicting hernia recurrence (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003). Contamination (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04) and enterocutaneous fistula (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02) at the time of surgery were associated with increased major complications, whereas body mass index (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01) and diabetes mellitus (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04) were associated with increased minor complications.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Large complex hernias can be reliably repaired using the components separation technique despite the presence of open wounds, the need for bowel surgery, and numerous comorbidities. The long-term strength of the hernia repair is not augmented by acellular cadaveric dermis but seems to be improved with soft polypropylene mesh.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ko, J. H., Wang, E. C., Salvay, D. M., Paul, B. C., Dumanian, G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.192</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Lessons Learned From 200 "Components Separation" Procedures [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1055</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1047</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1056?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Stitch Length on Wound Complications After Closure of Midline Incisions: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1056?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> In midline incisions closed with a single-layer running suture, the rate of wound complications is lower when a suture length to wound length ratio of at least 4 is accomplished with a short stitch length rather than with a long one.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective randomized controlled trial.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Surgical department.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Patients operated on through a midline incision.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Wound closure with a short stitch length (ie, placing stitches &lt;10 mm from the wound edge) or a long stitch length.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and incisional hernia.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In all, 737 patients were randomized: 381 were allocated to a long stitch length and 356, to a short stitch length. Wound dehiscence occurred in 1 patient whose wound was closed with a long stitch length. Surgical site infection occurred in 35 of 343 patients (10.2%) in the long stitch group and in 17 of 326 (5.2%) in the short stitch group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02). Incisional hernia was present in 49 of 272 patients (18.0%) in the long stitch group and in 14 of 250 (5.6%) in the short stitch group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). In multivariate analysis, a long stitch length was an independent risk factor for both surgical site infection and incisional hernia.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> In midline incisions closed with a running suture and having a suture length to wound length ratio of at least 4, current recommendations of placing stitches at least 10 mm from the wound edge should be changed to avoid patient suffering and costly wound complications. </p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00508053">NCT00508053</inter-ref></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Millbourn, D., Cengiz, Y., Israelsson, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.189</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Stitch Length on Wound Complications After Closure of Midline Incisions: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1059</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1056</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1060?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcomes From 3144 Adrenalectomies in the United States: Which Matters More, Surgeon Volume or Specialty? [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1060?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To assess the effect of surgeon volume and specialty on clinical and economic outcomes after adrenalectomy.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Population-based retrospective cohort analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample.</p>
<p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Adults (&ge;18 years) undergoing adrenalectomy in the United States (1999-2005). Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, surgeon specialty (general vs urologist), surgeon adrenalectomy volume, and hospital factors were assessed.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The <sup>2</sup> test, analysis of variance, and multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to assess in-hospital complications, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), and total inpatient hospital costs.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 3144 adrenalectomies were included. Mean patient age was 53.7 years; 58.8% were women and 77.4% white. A higher proportion of general surgeons were high-volume surgeons compared with urologists (34.1% vs 18.2%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Low-volume surgeons had more complications (18.2% vs 11.3%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and their patients had longer LOS (5.5 vs 3.9 days, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) than did high-volume surgeons; urologists had more complications (18.4% vs 15.2%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03) and higher costs ($13&nbsp;168 vs $11&nbsp;732, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02) than did general surgeons. After adjustment for patient and provider characteristics in multivariate analyses, surgeon volume, but not specialty, was an independent predictor of complications (odds ratio&nbsp;=&nbsp;1.5, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.002) and LOS (1.0-day difference, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Hospital volume was associated only with LOS (0.8-day difference, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.007). Surgeon volume, specialty, and hospital volume were not predictors of costs.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> To optimize outcomes, patients with adrenal disease should be referred to surgeons based on adrenal volume and laparoscopic expertise irrespective of specialty practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, H. S., Roman, S. A., Sosa, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.191</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcomes From 3144 Adrenalectomies in the United States: Which Matters More, Surgeon Volume or Specialty? [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1067</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1060</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1068?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors That Determine Satisfaction With Surgical Treatment of Low-Income Women With Breast Cancer [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1068?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To analyze the relationship between patient satisfaction with surgical treatment and 4 consultation skills and processes of the surgeons (time spent, listens carefully, explains concepts in a way the patient can understand, and shows respect for what the patient has to say), controlling for a range of patient, surgeon, and treatment characteristics.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Cross-sectional survey.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> The Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program for the state of California.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A statewide sample of 789 low-income women who received treatment for breast cancer from February 1, 2003, through September 31, 2005.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Satisfaction with surgical treatment.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Three of every 4 women reported being extremely satisfied with the treatment they received from their surgeon. African American women and those with arm swelling were less likely to be satisfied, whereas those reporting that the surgeon always spent enough time and explained concepts in a way they could understand were more likely to report greater satisfaction.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Our findings highlight the importance of 2 relatively simple behaviors that surgeons can easily implement to increase patient satisfaction, which can be of potential benefit in the litigious world of today.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thind, A., Diamant, A., Liu, Y., Maly, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Oncology, Breast Cancer, Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Communication, Patient Education/ Health Literacy, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgical Oncology, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.190</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors That Determine Satisfaction With Surgical Treatment of Low-Income Women With Breast Cancer [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1073</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1068</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1074?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measures to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Review [Review Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1074?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To review the current evidence on the efficacy of various interventions directed toward prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> A MEDLINE database search from January 1, 1990, to August 31, 2008, was performed to identify relevant articles using the keywords <I>pancreatoduodenectomy</I>, <I>pancreaticojejunostomy</I>, <I>pancreaticogastrostomy</I>, <I>pancreatic anastomotic leakage</I>, and <I>pancreatic fistula</I>. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> Case reports were excluded from this study.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> Of the identified studies, only those published in English describing meta-analyses or randomized controlled trials were considered first. In those aspects with limited or no randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized comparative studies and case series were included also.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> The prophylactic use of perioperative somatostatin and its analogues to prevent pancreas-related complications after pancreatic surgery remains controversial and does not result in a reduction of operative mortality. There is no clear evidence for or against a particular type of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis. Pancreaticoenterostomy cannot be replaced by pancreatic ductal obliteration. Pancreaticogastrostomy is equivalent to pancreaticojejunostomy in perioperative morbidity and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> More large-scale comparative studies and randomized controlled trials are required to determine the optimum pharmacologic interventions and technique of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lai, E. C. H., Lau, S. H. Y., Lau, W. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Review, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measures to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Review [Review Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1080</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1074</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1081?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Benign Fibroepithelial Polyp Arising in the Bronchus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature [Resident's Forum]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1081?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Benign endobronchial polyps are rare findings that present a diagnostic dilemma not only for the clinician but also for the pathologist. We describe a man with repeated visits to emergency departments for coughing spells who ultimately underwent bronchoscopy and biopsy. The biopsy specimen was initially diagnosed as a leiomyoma, but the final pathologic diagnosis of the gross specimen was a benign fibroepithelial polyp. We present the clinical history of this patient along with a brief review of the published literature regarding this rare clinical entity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amin, P. B., Baciewicz, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Thoracic Surgery, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Benign Fibroepithelial Polyp Arising in the Bronchus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature [Resident's Forum]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1083</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1081</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Resident's Forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1085?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1085?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sun, B., Moazzez, A., Mason, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.186-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1085</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1085</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1086?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1086?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.186-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1086</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1086</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1087?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1087?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratnapala, D. N., Lisle, D., Munn, E., Lambrianides, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.187-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1087</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1087</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1088?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1088?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.187-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1088</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1088</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1089?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Life and Times of Allen Oldfather Whipple: The Missionary and the Surgeon [Book Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1089?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfgang, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgery, Other, Humanities, History of Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Life and Times of Allen Oldfather Whipple: The Missionary and the Surgeon [Book Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1089</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1089</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>