<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org">
<title>Archives of Surgery recent issues</title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org</link>
<description>Archives of Surgery is an influential peer-reviewed monthly general surgery journal able to represent a full range of regional and specialty interests as the official publication of the New England Surgical Society, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, the Surgical Infection Society, and the Western Surgical Association.</description>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Surgery</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0004-0010</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/494?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/496?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/498?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/500?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/505?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/506?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/511?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/516?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/520?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/527?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/532?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/536?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/543?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/552?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/553?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/558?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/559?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/565?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/567?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/574?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/575?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/581?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/582?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/587?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/588?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/589?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/591?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/593?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/594?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/594-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/390?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/394?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/406?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/411?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/412?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/413?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/419?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/421?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/426?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/427?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/432?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/433?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/439?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/441?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/448?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/454?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/455?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/462?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/472?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/476?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/481?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/483?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/484?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/301?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/304?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/305?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/311?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/312?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/319?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/326?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/332?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/338?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/344?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/345?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/351?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/358?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/366?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/368?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/377?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/378?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/382?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/382-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/383?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/204?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/206?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/206-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/207?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/216?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/222?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/233?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/241?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/247?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/254?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/259?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/261?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/266?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/273?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/279?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/283?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/284?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/286?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/287?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/289?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/290?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/290-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/291?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/291-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/292?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/292-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif">
<title>Archives of Surgery</title>
<url>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif</url>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/494?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/494?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>494</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>494</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/496?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Should We Not Strive for a Balance Between Procedure Fee and Overall Cost?]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/496?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galandiuk, S., Allen, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.92</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Should We Not Strive for a Balance Between Procedure Fee and Overall Cost?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>497</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>496</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/497?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Devices, Products, and Other 1-Time-Use Items in the Operating Room]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/497?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.144.6.497</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Devices, Products, and Other 1-Time-Use Items in the Operating Room]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>497</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>497</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Call for Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/498?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: General Surgeons: A Dying Breed?]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/498?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chu, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education, Public Health, World Health, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Non-cardiothoracic Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.73</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: General Surgeons: A Dying Breed?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>499</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>498</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/500?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Risk Factors for Recurrence After Repair of Enterocutaneous Fistula]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/500?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To assess outcomes after repair of enterocutaneous fistulae (ECF) and identify factors that predict mortality and recurrence.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> One hundred thirty-five patients undergoing ECF repair between 1989 and 2005.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Mortality and recurrence of ECF.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Definitive operation for ECF was attempted in 135 patients. Mortality was 8%, recurrence was 17%, and 84% of patients eventually survived with a closed fistula. The primary determinant of mortality was ECF recurrence (odds ratio [OR], 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-23.4). Factors independently associated with ECF recurrence by multivariate logistic regression included the presence of inflammatory bowel disease (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.5-16.1), interval between diagnosis and operation of 36 weeks or longer (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.8-16.4), location of fistulae in the small intestine (OR, 9.8; 95% CI, 1.7-57.6), and resection with stapled anastomosis (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.3-13.2). Recurrence of ECF was 35% with resection and stapled anastomosis, 22% with simple oversew, and 11% with resection and hand-sewn anastomosis. Recurrence of ECF was 12% when operation was performed prior to 36 weeks from diagnosis, compared with 36% if performed at or beyond 36 weeks.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The primary determinant of mortality after ECF repair is a failed operation leading to recurrence of the fistula. Risk factors for ECF recurrence include inflammatory bowel disease, fistula located in the small intestine, an interval of 36 weeks or longer between diagnosis and operation, and resection with stapled anastomosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenner, M., Clayton, J. L., Tillou, A., Hiatt, J. R., Cryer, H. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.66</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Risk Factors for Recurrence After Repair of Enterocutaneous Fistula]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>505</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>500</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/505?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Maintenance of Certification]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/505?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.144.6.505</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Maintenance of Certification]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>505</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>505</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Call for Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/506?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Extreme Aggressiveness and Lethality of Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the Very Young]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/506?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine whether very young patients with gastric adenocarcinoma as compared with older patients with the disease have a biologically more aggressive form of the disease, presenting at an advanced stage and conferring unusually poor perioperative and long-term outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Design, Setting, and Patients&nbsp;</b> A 15-year, single-institution, retrospective review and analysis of demographic and outcomes data for 350 patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Histologic features, frequency of stage IV disease, frequency of curative gastric resection, postoperative mortality, and long-term survival in very young and older patient groups.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of 350 total patients, 30 (9%) were aged 35 years or younger. Very young patients (aged &le;35 years) as compared with older patients (aged >35 years) more often had diffuse-type tumor histologic findings (93% vs 69%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003), adjacent organ invasion (74% vs 29%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.001), nodal metastases (94% vs 70%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.046), distant metastases (81% vs 50%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003), and stage IV disease (90% vs 64%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.007). Potentially curative gastrectomy was accomplished in 58% of older patients but only 17% of very young patients (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.001). Nontherapeutic operations were performed in only 6% of older patients but 33% of very young patients (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.002). Very young patients as compared with older patients had high postoperative mortality (22% vs 2%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003) related to advanced-stage disease. Mean survival was 33.4 months among older patients compared with only 11.6 months for very young patients (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Very young patients (aged &le;35 years) with gastric adenocarcinoma have significantly higher incidences of diffuse-type tumor histologic findings and both locally advanced and metastatic disease at presentation. These findings confirm a more aggressive tumor biology that results in often futile surgical interventions and an unusually grave prognosis. Strategies for earlier diagnosis together with effective new therapies are desperately needed to attenuate the extreme lethality in these uniquely unfortunate patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, B. R., Stabile, B. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.77</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Extreme Aggressiveness and Lethality of Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the Very Young]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>510</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>506</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/511?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Combination of Microsatellite Instability and Lymphocytic Infiltrate as a Prognostic Indicator in Colon Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/511?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a genetic aberration associated with less aggressive tumor biology. Some tumors with MSI also have lymphocytic infiltrate (LI), which suggests a heightened immune response against the tumor.</p>
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the combined prognostic significance of MSI and LI in a colon cancer population.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Colon cancers were prospectively evaluated for MSI by assessing 11 satellite markers and were classified as MSI+ if 2 or more satellite markers displayed instability. Tumors were classified as LI+ if at least 5 lymphocytes were observed per 10 high-power fields.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Community hospital system.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Individuals undergoing definitive surgery for colon cancer.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Overall and disease-free survival were compared according to combined MSI and LI status.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In 150 patients, tumors were classified as follows: 95 were MSI&ndash;/LI&ndash;, 9 were MSI&ndash;/LI+, 30 were MSI+/LI&ndash;, and 16 were MSI+/LI+. Median follow-up was 40.6 months. Five-year disease-free survival was 56.7% for patients with MSI&ndash;/LI&ndash; tumors and 88.9% for those with MSI+/LI+ tumors (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). Patients with MSI+/LI&ndash; and MSI&ndash;/LI+ tumors had 5-year survival of 75.4% and 75.0%, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients with colon cancer and MSI&ndash;/LI&ndash; tumors have worse disease-free survival rate regardless of stage at diagnosis. Patients exhibiting both MSI+ and LI+ tumors have more favorable disease-free survival rates. Both MSI and LI show promise as a combined prognostic marker and with further study may prove to be particularly useful in selecting patients with stage II disease for adjunctive therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chang, E. Y., Dorsey, P. B., Frankhouse, J., Lee, R. G., Walts, D., Johnson, W., Anadiotis, G., Johnson, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Genetics, Genetic Disorders]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.40</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Combination of Microsatellite Instability and Lymphocytic Infiltrate as a Prognostic Indicator in Colon Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>515</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>511</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/516?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: The Use of a Spring-Loaded Silo for Gastroschisis: Impact on Practice Patterns and Outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/516?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the impact of the use of a bedside-placed spring-loaded silo (SLS) on practice patterns and on outcomes for infants with gastroschisis.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review comparing neonates with gastroschisis treated before and after the implementation of selective SLS placement.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Of 91 consecutive neonates admitted for initial treatment of gastroschisis between January 1998 and August 2007, 45 were admitted before and 46 were admitted after implementation of the SLS.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Immediate fascial closure rate, infection rate, time to fascial closure, time to initiation of enteral feeding, time to achievement of full enteral feeds, time of hyperalimentation requirement, and length of hospital stay.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The rate of immediate fascial closure was lower in the postimplementation group (58% before vs 20% after implementation, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Overall length of stay, time to enteral feeding, and infection rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The use of an SLS placed at the bedside has resulted in lower immediate fascial closure rates for infants with gastroschisis without significant detrimental clinical outcome. The main benefit of using the bedside-placed SLS is the avoidance of urgent surgical intervention. For patients undergoing delayed fascial closure, use of the bedside SLS resulted in shorter times to definitive fascial closure.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jensen, A. R., Waldhausen, J. H. T., Kim, S. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pediatrics, Congenital Malformations, Neonatology and Infant Care, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Pediatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.63</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: The Use of a Spring-Loaded Silo for Gastroschisis: Impact on Practice Patterns and Outcomes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>519</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>516</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/520?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Portomesenteric Venous Thrombosis After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/520?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PVT) is an uncommon but potentially lethal condition reported after several laparoscopic procedures. Its presentation, treatment, and outcomes remain poorly understood, and possible etiologic factors include venous stasis from increased intra-abdominal pressure, intraoperative manipulation, or damage to the splanchnic endothelium and systemic thrombophilic states.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Systematic literature review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic research.</p>
<p><b>Subjects&nbsp;</b> We summarized the clinical presentation and outcomes of PVT after laparoscopic surgery other than splenectomy in 18 subjects and reviewed the treatment strategies.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Systematic review of the literature on PVT after laparoscopic procedures other than splenectomy.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Eighteen cases of PVT following laparoscopic procedures were identified after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;7), Nissen fundoplication (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;5), partial colectomy (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;3), cholecystectomy (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;2), and appendectomy (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;1). The mean patient age was 42 years (age range, 20-74 years). Systemic predispositions toward venous thrombosis were identified in 11 patients. Clinical symptoms consisted primarily of abdominal pain manifested, on average, 14 days (range, 3-42 days) after surgery. Thrombus location varied, but 8 patients had a combination of portal and superior mesenteric venous thrombosis. Sixteen patients were treated with anticoagulation therapy. Ten patients underwent major interventions, including exploratory laparotomy in 6 patients and thrombolytic therapy in 4 patients. Six patients had complications, and 2 patients died.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Portomesenteric venous thrombosis following laparoscopic surgery usually manifests as nonspecific abdominal pain. Computed tomography can readily provide the diagnosis and demonstrate the extent of the disease. Treatment should be individualized based on the extent of thrombosis and the presence of bowel ischemia but should include anticoagulation therapy. Venous stasis from increased intra-abdominal pressure, intraoperative manipulation of splanchnic vasculature, and systemic thrombophilic states likely converges to produce this potentially lethal condition.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[James, A. W., Rabl, C., Westphalen, A. C., Fogarty, P. F., Posselt, A. M., Campos, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Blood/ Coagulation, Review]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.81</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Portomesenteric Venous Thrombosis After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>526</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>520</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/527?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Ampulla of Vater: Biological Behavior and Surgical Management]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/527?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To describe the biological behavior and surgical management of ampullary neuroendocrine tumors in 7 patients.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Case series and literature review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Seven patients with ampullary neuroendocrine tumors.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Clinical presentation, pathologic findings, and survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The patients presented with jaundice (3 patients), anemia (1 patient), gastric outlet obstruction (1 patient), or incidental discovery (2 patients). No patients had neurofibromatosis. Preoperative biopsy was diagnostic in 5 of 6 patients. All of the tumors expressed chromogranin and synaptophysin. Even when the tumor expressed gastrin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, or somatostatin, no patient had a hypersecretion syndrome. Five patients were treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy, 4 for low-grade neuroendocrine tumors and 1 for high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. The lesions measured 1.0 to 3.5 cm in diameter. Computed tomographic scans failed to detect nodal metastases that were present in 4 patients. One patient with a high-grade malignant neoplasm died after 15 months. The rest were disease-free after 19 to 48 months. Two patients had transduodenal local resections, one for a 1.1-cm paraganglioma (disease-free, 11 years) and the other for a 0.6-cm carcinoid tumor (disease-free, 7 months).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> This is one of the largest series of neuroendocrine tumors of the ampulla. Preoperative biopsy was accurate, but computed tomographic scans were insensitive in detecting nodal metastases. Unlike duodenal carcinoid tumors, hypersecretion syndromes were absent and small tumor size did not preclude locoregional metastases. Tumor grade predicted survival. We recommend pancreaticoduodenectomy for this disease, with local resection reserved for mobile, superficial lesions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carter, J. T., Grenert, J. P., Rubenstein, L., Stewart, L., Way, L. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.80</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Ampulla of Vater: Biological Behavior and Surgical Management]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>531</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>527</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/532?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Racial Clustering and Access to Colorectal Surgeons, Gastroenterologists, and Radiation Oncologists by African Americans and Asian Americans in the United States: A County-Level Data Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/532?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Minority groups have poor access to quality health care services. This is true of colorectal cancer care and may be related to both geographical proximity and use of surgical, gastroenterology, and radiation oncology services. Without suitable access, many minority patients may present with advanced colorectal cancer and be less likely to receive appropriate adjuvant therapies. We sought to examine the variations in geographical access among minorities at a county level.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> A retrospective analysis was performed using data from the Area Resource File. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify the variations in access to colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologists, and radiation oncologists.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> All counties in the United States.</p>
<p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Prevalence rate of African Americans and Asian Americans within a county.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Rate of colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologists, and radiation oncologists.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Unadjusted analysis revealed that each percentage point increase in the African American population within a county was associated with a decrease in the number of specialists within that county. Multivariate analysis also revealed a statistically significant decrease in the number of gastroenterologists (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and radiation oncologists (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) with each percentage point increase in the African American population and a trend toward a decrease in colorectal surgeons within that county (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.28). Each percentage point increase in the Asian American population was associated with a significant increase in the number of gastroenterologists (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and radiation oncologists (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) with a similar trend toward an increase in the number of colorectal surgeons within that county (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.13).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Increasing numbers of minority patients in counties is accompanied by a differential access to specialists. This may affect the likelihood of a patient to receive appropriate care.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayanga, A. J., Waljee, A. K., Kaiser, H. E., Chang, D. C., Morris, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Oncology, Colon Cancer, Oncology, Other, Radiation Therapy, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.68</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Racial Clustering and Access to Colorectal Surgeons, Gastroenterologists, and Radiation Oncologists by African Americans and Asian Americans in the United States: A County-Level Data Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>535</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>532</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/536?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Preventable Morbidity at a Mature Trauma Center]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/536?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To analyze the preventable and potentially preventable complications occurring at a mature level I trauma center.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic level I trauma center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> The study included 35&nbsp;311 trauma registry patients.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The cause, effect on outcome, preventability (preventable, potentially preventable, or nonpreventable), and loop closure recommendations for all preventable and potentially preventable complications, and clinical data related to each complication retrieved from the trauma registry and individual medical records.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Over the 8-year study, 35&nbsp;311 trauma registry patients experienced 2560 complications. Three hundred fifty-one patients (0.99% of all patients) had 403 preventable or potentially preventable complications. The most common preventable or potentially preventable complications were unintended extubation (63 patients [17% of complications]), surgical technical failures (61 patients [15% of complications]), missed injuries (58 patients [14% of complications]), and intravascular catheter&ndash;related complications (48 patients [12% of complications]). These complications were clinically relevant; 258 (64% of complications) resulted in a change in management, including 61 laparotomies, 52 reintubations, 41 chest tube insertions, and 19 vascular interventions.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The incidence of preventable or potentially preventable complications at an academic level I trauma center is low. These complications often require a change in management and cluster in 4 major categories (ie, unintended extubation, surgical technical failures, missed injuries, and intravascular catheter&ndash;related complications) that must be recognized as critical areas for quality improvement initiatives.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teixeira, P. G. R., Inaba, K., Salim, A., Rhee, P., Brown, C., Browder, T., DuBose, J., Nomoto, S., Demetriades, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Adult Critical Care, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Review, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.82</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Preventable Morbidity at a Mature Trauma Center]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>541</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>536</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/541?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Preventable Morbidity at a Mature Trauma Center--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/541?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Velmahos, G. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Adult Critical Care, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Review, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.86</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Preventable Morbidity at a Mature Trauma Center--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>542</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>541</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/543?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Survival Analysis in Amputees Based on Physical Independence Grade Achievement]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/543?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Backgound&nbsp;</b> Survival implications of achieving different grades of physical independence after lower extremity amputation are unknown.</p>
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To identify thresholds of physical independence achievement associated with improved 6-month survival and to identify and compare other risk factors after removing the influence of the grade achieved.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Data were combined from 8 administrative databases. Grade was measured on the basis of 13 individual self-care and mobility activities measured at inpatient rehabilitation discharge.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Ninety-nine US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 2616 veterans who underwent lower extremity amputation and subsequent inpatient rehabilitation between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2004.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Cumulative 6-month survival after rehabilitation discharge.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The 6-month survival rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) for those at grade 1 (total assistance) was 73.5% (70.5%-76.2%). The achievement of grade 2 (maximal assistance) led to the largest incremental improvement in prognosis with survival increasing to 91.1% (95% CI, 85.6%-94.5%). In amputees who remained at grade 1, the 30-day hazards ratio for survival compared with grade 6 (independent) was 43.9 (95% CI, 10.8-278.2), sharply decreasing with time. Whereas metastatic cancer and hemodialysis remained significantly associated with reduced survival (both <I>P</I>&nbsp;&le;&nbsp;.001), anatomical amputation level was not significant when rehabilitation discharge grade and other diagnostic conditions were considered.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Even a small improvement to grade 2 in the most severely impaired amputees resulted in better 6-month survival. Health care systems must plan appropriate interdisciplinary treatment strategies for both medical and functional issues after amputation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stineman, M. G., Kurichi, J. E., Kwong, P. L., Maislin, G., Reker, D. M., Vogel, W. B., Prvu-Bettger, J. A., Bidelspach, D. E., Bates, B. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Rehabilitation Medicine, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.37</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Survival Analysis in Amputees Based on Physical Independence Grade Achievement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>551</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>543</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/552?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Survival Analysis in Amputees Based on Physical Independence Grade Achievement--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/552?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watkins, M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Rehabilitation Medicine, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery, Endocrine Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.144.6.552</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Survival Analysis in Amputees Based on Physical Independence Grade Achievement--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>552</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>552</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/553?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Surgical Glove Perforation and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/553?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Clinically apparent surgical glove perforation increases the risk of surgical site infection (SSI).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective observational cohort study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University Hospital Basel, with an average of 28&nbsp;000 surgical interventions per year.</p>
<p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Consecutive series of 4147 surgical procedures performed in the Visceral Surgery, Vascular Surgery, and Traumatology divisions of the Department of General Surgery.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The outcome of interest was SSI occurrence as assessed pursuant to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention standards. The primary predictor variable was compromised asepsis due to glove perforation.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The overall SSI rate was 4.5% (188 of 4147 procedures). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed a higher likelihood of SSI in procedures in which gloves were perforated compared with interventions with maintained asepsis (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.8; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). However, multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the increase in SSI risk with perforated gloves was different for procedures with vs those without surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (test for effect modification, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.005). Without antimicrobial prophylaxis, glove perforation entailed significantly higher odds of SSI compared with the reference group with no breach of asepsis (adjusted OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7-10.8; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003). On the contrary, when surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was applied, the likelihood of SSI was not significantly higher for operations in which gloves were punctured (adjusted OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9-1.9; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.26).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Without surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, glove perforation increases the risk of SSI.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misteli, H., Weber, W. P., Reck, S., Rosenthal, R., Zwahlen, M., Fueglistaler, P., Bolli, M. K., Oertli, D., Widmer, A. F., Marti, W. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Infectious Diseases, Other, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.60</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Surgical Glove Perforation and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>558</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>553</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/558?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Surgical Glove Perforation and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/558?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornwell, E. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Infectious Diseases, Other, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.71</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Surgical Glove Perforation and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>558</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>558</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/559?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Actual 3-Year Survival After Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/559?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To analyze 3-year actual disease-free survival after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer on the assumption that 3-year disease-free survival may represent 5-year overall survival.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Department of surgery of a university hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 197 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer from May 1998 to September 2007 and who were followed up for more than 3 years.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Feasibility and long-term survival rate with survival analysis by the Kaplan-Meier method.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Subtotal and total gastrectomies were performed in 178 and 19 patients, respectively. The scope of the lymph node dissections were D1 + &beta; (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;152) and D2 (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;45). There were 153, 28, 8, 6, 1, and 1 patients in stages Ia, Ib, II, IIIa, IIIb, and IV, respectively. The median follow-up was 45 months (range, 1-113 months), and there were 7 recurrences. Multivariate analysis of disease-specific survival showed that depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis influenced the prognosis independently. The actual 3-year disease-free survival rate for all patients was 96.9%. The 173 patients with early gastric cancer and 24 with advanced gastric cancer showed 98.8% and 79.1% actual 3-year disease-free survival rates, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy is acceptable oncologically in early gastric cancer if 3-year disease-free survival represents 5-year overall survival. Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy may also play an important role in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hwang, S.-H., Park, D. J., Jee, Y. S., Kim, M.-C., Kim, H.-H., Lee, H.-J., Yang, H.-K., Lee, K. U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Actual 3-Year Survival After Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>564</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>559</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/565?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Actual 3-Year Survival After Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/565?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Easter, D. W., Thompson, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.79</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Actual 3-Year Survival After Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>565</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>565</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: Operative Technique for Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Papillary thyroid carcinoma is the most common endocrine malignancy. Recently, controversy has focused on the management of lymph node metastases, which represent approximately 90% of disease recurrences and may require considerable time, effort, and resources to diagnose and treat. Current intense postoperative surveillance by endocrinologists nationwide has the sensitivity to detect even minute lymph node metastases using ultrasonography, radioactive iodine scan, and thyroglobulin monitoring.</p>
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To (1) present a succinct synopsis of the rationale and elements of our current surgical management strategy for papillary thyroid carcinoma and, within this context, (2) provide a detailed stepwise description of a compartment-oriented modified radical neck dissection. This description is combined with intraoperative photographs and a medical artist's illustrations to enhance and emphasize the most important points.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> With anatomically defined precise dissection, following the steps outlined and illustrated, a thorough lymphadenectomy can be accomplished safely, with reasonable cosmetic results, minimizing disease relapse.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Porterfield, J. R., Factor, D. A., Grant, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.89</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: Operative Technique for Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>574</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Operative Technique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/574?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Operative Technique for Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/574?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carty, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.90</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Operative Technique for Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>574</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>574</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/575?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Hepatic Portal Venous Gas: The ABCs of Management]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/575?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To review the use of computed tomography (CT) and radiography in managing hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) at a university-affiliated tertiary care center and in the literature. Hepatic portal venous gas is frequently associated with acute mesenteric ischemia, accounting for most of the HPVG-associated mortality. While early studies were necessarily dependent on plain abdominal radiography, modern high-resolution CT has revealed a host of benign conditions in which HPVG has been reported that do not require emergent surgery.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> Patient records from our institution over the last 10 years and relevant studies from BioMed Central, CENTRAL, PubMed, and PubMed Central. In addition, references cited in selected works were also used as source data.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> Patient records were selected if the CT or radiograph findings matched the term <I>hepatic portal venous gas</I>. Studies were selected based on the search terms <I>hepatic portal venous gas</I> or <I>portal venous gas</I>.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> Quantitative and qualitative data were quoted directly from cited work.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> Early studies of HPVG were based on plain abdominal radiography and a literature survey in 1978 found an associated mortality rate of 75%, primarily due to ischemic bowel disease. Modern abdominal CT has resulted in the detection of HPVG in more benign conditions, and a second literature survey in 2001 found a total mortality of only 39%. While the pathophysiology of HPVG is, as yet, unclear, changing abdominal imaging technology has altered the significance of this radiologic finding. Hepatic portal venous gas therefore predicts high risk of mortality (>50%) if detected by plain radiography or by CT in a patient with additional evidence of necrotic bowel. If detected by CT in patients after surgical or endoscopic manipulation, the clinician is advised that there is no evidence of increased risk. If HPVG is detected by CT in patients with active peptic ulcer disease, intestinal obstruction and/or dilatation, or mucosal diseases such as Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis, caution is warranted, as risk of death may approach 20% to 30%.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The finding of HPVG alone cannot be an indication for emergency exploration, and we have developed an evidence-based algorithm to guide the clinician in management of patients with HPVG.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson, A. L., Millington, T. M., Sahani, D., Chung, R. T., Bauer, C., Hertl, M., Warshaw, A. L., Conrad, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Review, Diagnosis, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Computed Tomography, Radiography, Emergency Medicine, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.88</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Hepatic Portal Venous Gas: The ABCs of Management]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>581</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>575</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/581?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Hepatic Portal Venous Gas--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/581?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wente, M. N., Buchler, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Review, Diagnosis, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Computed Tomography, Radiography, Emergency Medicine, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.87</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Hepatic Portal Venous Gas--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>581</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>581</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/582?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[RESIDENT'S FORUM: A Merkel Cell Carcinoma Treatment Algorithm]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/582?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy of the skin. Approximately 2000 cases of Merkel cell carcinoma have been reported since its first published description in 1972. Owing to its rarity, scientific studies have been difficult. Our current knowledge is based on retrospective case studies and case reports. Although many treatment modalities have been used, no definitive management strategy has yet been elucidated. Current strategies include local excision, Mohs surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy, lymph node dissection, irradiation, and chemotherapy. We present several recent cases to demonstrate the heterogeneity of this cancer, then we review the literature to suggest a treatment algorithm for this rare but aggressive cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruan, J. H., Reeves, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Skin Cancer, Dermatology, Dermatologic Disorders, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Melanoma, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.91</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[RESIDENT'S FORUM: A Merkel Cell Carcinoma Treatment Algorithm]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>585</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>582</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Resident's Forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/587?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/587?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirchhoff, P., Viehl, C. T., Heizmann, O., Oertli, D., Potthast, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.62-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>587</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>587</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/588?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/588?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.62-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>588</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>588</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/589?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/589?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misiakos, E. P., Liakakos, T., Preza, U., Fotiadis, C., Macheras, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.69-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>589</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>589</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/590?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/590?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.69-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>590</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>590</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/591?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Report of the American Board of Surgery]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/591?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lewis, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Vascular Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.85</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Report of the American Board of Surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>593</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>591</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/593?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Another Step Toward Scarless Surgery]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/593?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MacDonald, E. R., Ahmed, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endoscopy of Upper Aerodigestive Tract, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.95</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Another Step Toward Scarless Surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>594</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>593</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/594?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Operative Blood Loss and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/594?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conway, W. C., Gagandeep, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Physiology, Blood/ Coagulation, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases, Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies, Hematology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Operative Blood Loss and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>594</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>594</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/594-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Operative Blood Loss and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer--Reply]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/6/594-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reber, H. A., Hines, O. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Physiology, Blood/ Coagulation, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases, Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies, Hematology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.102</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Operative Blood Loss and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer--Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>595</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>594</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/390?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/390?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>390</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>390</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/392?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[REVIEWERS LIST: Reviewers Who Completed a Review During 2008]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/392?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freischlag, J. A., Schulick, R. D., Lipsett, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.41</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[REVIEWERS LIST: Reviewers Who Completed a Review During 2008]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>393</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>392</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Reviewers List</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/394?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: New World of Patient Safety: 23rd Annual Samuel Jason Mixter Lecture]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/394?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leape, L. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.78</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: New World of Patient Safety: 23rd Annual Samuel Jason Mixter Lecture]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>398</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>394</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Outcomes Following Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery in Pregnant Women]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To perform the first population-based measurement of clinical and economic outcomes after thyroid and parathyroid surgery in pregnant women and identify the characteristics of this population and the predictors of outcome.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective cross-sectional study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS), a 20% sample of nonfederal US hospitals.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> All pregnant women, compared with age-matched nonpregnant women, who underwent thyroid and parathyroid procedures from 1999 to 2005.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Fetal, maternal, and surgical complications, in-hospital mortality, median length of stay, and hospital costs.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 201 pregnant women underwent thyroid (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;165) and parathyroid (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;36) procedures and were examined together. The mean age was 29 years, 60% were white, 25% were emergent or urgent admissions, and 46% had thyroid cancer. Compared with nonpregnant women (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;31&nbsp;155), pregnant patients had a higher rate of endocrine (15.9 vs 8.1%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and general complications (11.4 vs 3.6%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), longer unadjusted lengths of stay (2 days vs 1 day; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), and higher unadjusted hospital costs ($6873 vs $5963; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.007). The fetal and maternal complication rates were 5.5% and 4.5%, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, pregnancy was an independent predictor of higher combined surgical complications (odds ratio,&nbsp;2; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), longer adjusted length of stay (0.3 days longer; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), and higher adjusted hospital costs ($300; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Other independent predictors of outcome were surgeon volume, patient race or ethnicity, and insurance status.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Pregnant women have worse clinical and economic outcomes following thyroid and parathyroid surgery than nonpregnant women, with disparities in outcomes based on race, insurance, and access to high-volume surgeons.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kuy, S., Roman, S. A., Desai, R., Sosa, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Women's Health, Pregnancy and Breast Feeding, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.48</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Outcomes Following Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery in Pregnant Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>406</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/406?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Outcomes Following Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery in Pregnant Women--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/406?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moore, F. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Women's Health, Pregnancy and Breast Feeding, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.61</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Outcomes Following Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery in Pregnant Women--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>406</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>406</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Anastomotic Leak Testing After Colorectal Resection: What Are the Data?]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the value of anastomotic leak testing of left-sided colorectal anastomoses.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Cohort analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Subspecialty practice at a tertiary care facility.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Consecutive subjects were selected from a prospective colorectal database of 2627 patients treated between January l, 2001, and December 31, 2007.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Creation of left-sided colorectal anastomoses and air leak testing per surgeon preference.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcomes Measures&nbsp;</b> Anastomosis type, method (handsewn vs stapled), performance of air leak testing, repair method of anastomoses after air leak tests yielding positive results, and development of postoperative clinical leak.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 998 left-sided colorectal anastomoses were performed without proximal diversion; 90.1% were stapled and 9.9% were handsewn. Intraoperative air leaks were noted in 65 of 825 tested anastomoses (7.9%), that is, 7.8% of stapled anastomoses and 9.5% of handsewn anastomoses. A clinical leak developed in 48 patients (4.8%). Clinical leaks were noted in 7.7% of anastomoses with positive air leak test results compared with 3.8% of anastomoses with negative air leak test results and 8.1% of all untested anastomoses (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.03). If air leak testing yielded positive results, suture repair alone was associated with the highest rate of postoperative clinical leak compared with diversion or reanastomosis, 12.2% vs 0% vs 0%, respectively (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.19).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Our data indicate a high rate of air leaks at air leak testing of left-sided colorectal anastomoses. In addition, the high rate of clinical leaks in untested anastomoses leads us to recommend air leak testing of all left-sided anastomoses, whether stapled or handsewn.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricciardi, R., Roberts, P. L., Marcello, P. W., Hall, J. F., Read, T. E., Schoetz, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.43</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Anastomotic Leak Testing After Colorectal Resection: What Are the Data?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>411</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/411?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Anastomotic Leak Testing After Colorectal Resection--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/411?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Longo, W. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.72</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Anastomotic Leak Testing After Colorectal Resection--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>412</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>411</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/412?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRECTION: Middle Initial Missing From Author Name in: Laryngeal Complications After Thyroidectomy: Is It Always the Surgeon?]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/412?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.96</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRECTION: Middle Initial Missing From Author Name in: Laryngeal Complications After Thyroidectomy: Is It Always the Surgeon?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>412</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>412</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/413?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Blunt Pancreatoduodenal Injury: A Multicenter Study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT)]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/413?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the safety of nonoperative management (NOM), to examine the diagnostic sensitivity of computed tomography (CT), and to identify missed diagnoses and related outcomes in patients with blunt pancreatoduodenal injury (BPDI).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective multicenter study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Eleven New England trauma centers (7 academic and 4 nonacademic).</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Two hundred thirty patients (&gt;15 years old) with BPDI admitted to the hospital during 11 years. Each BPDI was graded from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grading system.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Success of NOM, sensitivity of CT, BPDI-related complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Ninety-seven patients (42.2%) with mostly grades 1 and 2 BPDI were selected for NOM: NOM failed in 10 (10.3%), 10 (10.3%) developed BPDI-related complications (3 in patients in whom NOM failed), and 7 (7.2%) died (none related to failure of NOM). The remaining 133 patients were operated on urgently: 34 (25.6%) developed BPDI-related complications and 20 (15.0%) died. The initial CT missed BPDI in 30 patients (13.0%); 4 of them (13.3%) died but not because of the BPDI. The mortality rate in patients without a missed diagnosis was 8.8% (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.50). There was no correlation between time to diagnosis and length of hospital stay (Spearman <I>r</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.06; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.43). The sensitivity of CT for BPDI was 75.7% (76% for pancreatic and 70% for duodenal injuries).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The NOM of low-grade BPDI is safe despite occasional failures. Missed diagnosis of BPDI continues to occur despite advances in CT but does not seem to cause adverse outcomes in most patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Velmahos, G. C., Tabbara, M., Gross, R., Willette, P., Hirsch, E., Burke, P., Emhoff, T., Gupta, R., Winchell, R. J., Patterson, L. A., Manon-Matos, Y., Alam, H. B., Rosenblatt, M., Hurst, J., Brotman, S., Crookes, B., Sartorelli, K., Chang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.52</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Blunt Pancreatoduodenal Injury: A Multicenter Study of the Research Consortium of New England Centers for Trauma (ReCONECT)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>419</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>413</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/419?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Blunt Pancreatoduodenal Injury--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/419?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sutton, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.58</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Blunt Pancreatoduodenal Injury--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>420</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>419</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/421?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Gauging Surgeons' Understanding and Perceptions of an Academic Incentive Plan]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/421?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To gauge the faculty's understanding and perceptions of a recently implemented academic incentive plan (AIP) to encourage productivity.</p>
<p><b>Design, Setting, and Participants&nbsp;</b> Surveys were administered to faculty at a university teaching hospital before and after allocation of the incentive during the inaugural implementation of an AIP.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Survey Likert scale.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Preallocation and postallocation survey response rates were 64% and 67%, respectively. Although 92% of respondents submitted the required self-reports of academic activities, only 25% met with their chiefs to assess productivity. Despite the small incentive, more than 50% believed that the AIP encouraged them to increase academic pursuits and rewarded activities important to the department that had not previously been reimbursed. Most did not believe that teaching, clinical research, or citizenship were adequately compensated before or after AIP implementation. However, more thought that citizenship (<I>P</I>=.02) and administration (<I>P</I>=.001) were adequately compensated in the postallocation vs preallocation survey; there were similar trends for clinical research (<I>P</I>=.17) and teaching (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.06). Among 25 respondents who provided additional comments, 52% mentioned a lack of transparency in the method of incentive distribution as a concern.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Although only a few met with their chiefs for assessment, most faculty believed that even a minimal financial incentive might encourage them to increase their academic activities. We are encouraged to continue the AIP as a positive motivator for academic pursuits, and we plan additional measures to make incentive allocation more transparent.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell, C. C., Ashley, S. W., Orgill, D. P., Zinner, M. J., Raut, C. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Academic Medical Centers, Medical Education, Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.47</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Gauging Surgeons' Understanding and Perceptions of an Academic Incentive Plan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>426</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>421</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/426?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Gauging Surgeons' Understanding and Perceptions of an Academic Incentive Plan--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/426?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orlando, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Academic Medical Centers, Medical Education, Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.54</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Gauging Surgeons' Understanding and Perceptions of an Academic Incentive Plan--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>426</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>426</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/427?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Nonneonatal Acute Respiratory Failure: The Massachusetts General Hospital Experience From 1990 to 2008]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/427?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the efficacy of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for nonneonatal acute respiratory failure.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Single-institution, retrospective medical record review from February 1990 to March 2008.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary care hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Eighty-one nonneonatal patients (mean age, 23 years; age range, 2 months to 61 years) with acute respiratory failure who had failed maximal ventilator support received ECMO therapy between 1990 and 2008. Patients were grouped into 6 categories based on diagnosis: sepsis (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;8), bacterial or fungal pneumonia (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;15), viral pneumonia (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;9), trauma or burn (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;10), immunocompromise (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;15), and other (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;24).</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Survival to hospital discharge.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Overall survival was 53%. Survival was highest in patients with viral pneumonia (78%), followed by bacterial pneumonia (53%), sepsis syndrome (44%), and immunocompromise (40%). Patients treated following trauma or burns had the lowest survival (33%). The average age was 19 years for survivors as compared with 27 years for nonsurvivors. Survival was lower in patients with multiple organ failure as compared with those with single organ failure (33% vs 60%, respectively), in patients who experienced mechanical ventilation for longer than 10 days prior to the initiation of ECMO as compared with those who received ventilatory support for less than 10 days prior to the initiation of ECMO (31% vs 57%, respectively), and in patients requiring more than 400 hours of ECMO support as compared with those requiring less than 400 hours of ECMO support (42% vs 55%, respectively).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Therapy with ECMO may provide a survival benefit in carefully selected patients with nonneonatal acute respiratory failure who have failed maximal ventilator support. Nonneonatal survival with ECMO therapy is strongly dependent on diagnosis, with the highest survival seen in those with viral or bacterial pneumonia. Older age, multiple organ failure, prolonged ventilation prior to ECMO initiation, and long ECMO runs are associated with decreased survival.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nehra, D., Goldstein, A. M., Doody, D. P., Ryan, D. P., Chang, Y., Masiakos, P. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Adult Critical Care, Pulmonary Diseases, Pulmonary Diseases, Other, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Surgery, Other, Transplantation, Transplantation, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.45</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Nonneonatal Acute Respiratory Failure: The Massachusetts General Hospital Experience From 1990 to 2008]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>432</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>427</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/432?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Nonneonatal Acute Respiratory Failure--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/432?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Touloukian, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Adult Critical Care, Pulmonary Diseases, Pulmonary Diseases, Other, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Surgery, Other, Transplantation, Transplantation, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.44</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Nonneonatal Acute Respiratory Failure--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>432</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>432</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/433?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Fulminant Clostridium difficile Colitis: Patterns of Care and Predictors of Mortality]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/433?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> There exist predictors of mortality and the need for colectomy among patients with fulminant <I>Clostridium difficile</I> colitis.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic tertiary referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> We reviewed the records of 4796 inpatients diagnosed as having <I>C difficile</I> colitis from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2007, and identified 199 (4.1%) with fulminant <I>C difficile</I> colitis, as defined by the need for colectomy or admission to the intensive care unit for <I>C difficile</I> colitis.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Risk of inpatient mortality was determined by multivariate analysis according to clinical predictors, colectomy, and medical team.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The inhospital mortality rate for fulminant <I>C difficile</I> colitis was 34.7%. Independent predictors of mortality included the following: (1) age of 70 years or older, (2) severe leukocytosis or leukopenia (white blood cell count, &ge;35&nbsp;000/&micro;L or &lt;4000/&micro;L) or bandemia (neutrophil bands, &ge;10%), and (3) cardiorespiratory failure (intubation or vasopressors). When all 3 factors were present, the mortality rate was 57.1%; when all 3 were absent, the mortality rate was 0%. Patients who underwent colectomy had a trend toward decreased mortality rates (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-1.1; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.08). Among patients admitted primarily for fulminant <I>C difficile</I> colitis, care in the surgical department compared with the nonsurgical department resulted in a higher rate of operation (85.1% vs 11.2%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and lower mortality rates (12.8% vs 39.3%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.001). Patients admitted directly to the surgical department had a shorter mean (SD) interval from admission to operation (0 vs 1.7&nbsp;[2.8] days; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Despite awareness and treatment, fulminant <I>C difficile</I> colitis remains a highly lethal disease. Reliable predictors of mortality exist and should be used to prompt aggressive surgical intervention. Survival rates are higher in patients who were cared for by surgical vs nonsurgical departments, possibly because of more frequent and earlier operations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sailhamer, E. A., Carson, K., Chang, Y., Zacharias, N., Spaniolas, K., Tabbara, M., Alam, H. B., DeMoya, M. A., Velmahos, G. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Infectious Diseases, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.51</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Fulminant Clostridium difficile Colitis: Patterns of Care and Predictors of Mortality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>439</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>433</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/439?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Fulminant Clostridium difficile Colitis--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/439?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murray, J. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Infectious Diseases, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.53</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Fulminant Clostridium difficile Colitis--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>440</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>439</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/441?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Trends in Presentation and Survival for Gallbladder Cancer During a Period of More Than 4 Decades: A Single-Institution Experience]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/441?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To determine the prevalence of incidentally found cases of gallbladder cancer, the incidence of residual disease at reexploration, and the changes in the mode of presentation, treatment, and survival of patients with gallbladder cancer during a period of more than 4 decades.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective case series.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University-affiliated tertiary care center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Between January 1, 1962, and March 1, 2008, 402 patients with gallbladder cancer were identified and their clinicopathologic data were analyzed.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> Surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Incidentally discovered gallbladder cancer, incidence of residual disease, and differences in presentation, treatment, and survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Surgical exploration was performed in 260 patients (64.7%), of whom 151 (58.1%) underwent resection. The median age of the patients was 72 years, and 72.3% were female. Between January 1, 1994, and March 1, 2008, 6881 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed, and there were 17 incidentally discovered cases of gallbladder cancer (0.25%). Residual disease on reexploration was identified in 0 of 2 patients with T1 tumor, 3 of 13 patients with T2 tumor, and 8 of 10 patients with T3 tumor (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). Patients with stage IV disease (34 [13.1%] diagnosed from 1962-1979; 34 [13.1%] diagnosed from 1980-1997; and 22 [8.5%] diagnosed from 1998-2008) had a median survival of 4 months (range, 0-37 months). Concomitant liver resections increased in the third study period (11.1%, 10.1%, and 54.3%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), with an increase in negative margins (33.3%, 42.0%, and 63.0%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). Cox regression analysis identified T stage and surgical margin status as significant prognostic factors.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Gallbladder cancer is incidentally found during 0.25% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies. As T stage increases, the likelihood of residual disease on reexploration increases. Although many patients with gallbladder cancer present with incurable disease and have very poor survival, the overall prognosis is improving, likely because of more extensive operations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Konstantinidis, I. T., Deshpande, V., Genevay, M., Berger, D., Fernandez-del Castillo, C., Tanabe, K. K., Zheng, H., Lauwers, G. Y., Ferrone, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.46</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Trends in Presentation and Survival for Gallbladder Cancer During a Period of More Than 4 Decades: A Single-Institution Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>447</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>441</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/447?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Trends in Presentation and Survival for Gallbladder Cancer During a Period of More Than 4 Decades--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/447?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCahill, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.55</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Trends in Presentation and Survival for Gallbladder Cancer During a Period of More Than 4 Decades--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>447</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/448?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Current Trends in Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/448?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To define how patients with pancreatic cysts are being diagnosed and treated.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective case series.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University-affiliated tertiary care center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Four hundred one patients evaluated in the Department of Surgery between January 2004 and December 2007.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Clinical management, histological diagnosis, and results of surveillance.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Pancreatic cysts were incidentally discovered in 71% (284 of 401) of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in age (60.4 vs 63.1 years; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.10), cyst size (31 vs 27 mm; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.12), or histological diagnosis between symptomatic patients and patients with incidentally discovered cysts. Whereas the majority of symptomatic patients had their cystic neoplasms resected on diagnosis, 50% (142 of 284) of incidentally discovered cysts were initially managed nonoperatively. Of the patients who were managed with surveillance, 13 (8%) subsequently underwent resection after a median of 2.1 years because of an increase in cyst size, development of symptoms, increasing tumor markers, worrisome endoscopic ultrasonography findings, or patient anxiety. The most common diagnosis among resected lesions was either main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (25%) or branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (23%). Invasive cancer was found in 29 of 256 (11%) resected cystic neoplasms, 9 of which were incidentally discovered, and in 7% (1 of 13) of patients who underwent watchful waiting prior to resection.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Incidentally discovered pancreatic cystic neoplasms composed 71% of our series, of which 50% were immediately resected. Subsequent morphologic changes or development of symptoms prompted an operation in 8% of patients after a period of surveillance. Invasive malignancy was present in 11% of all resected specimens but in 38% of main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferrone, C. R., Correa-Gallego, C., Warshaw, A. L., Brugge, W. R., Forcione, D. G., Thayer, S. P., Fernandez-del Castillo, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endoscopy of Upper Aerodigestive Tract, Radiology of Head & Neck, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Ultrasonography, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.36</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Current Trends in Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>454</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>448</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/454?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Maintenance of Certification]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/454?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.144.5.454</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Maintenance of Certification]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>454</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>454</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Call for Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/455?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Quality Measures for Breast Cancer Surgery: Initial Validation of Feasibility and Assessment of Variation Among Surgeons]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/455?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To identify and quantify surgical outcomes as possible quality measures of initial breast cancer surgery and to assess variation among surgeons.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Descriptive analysis of concurrently collected outcome measures.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospital with a designated breast cancer center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing their initial cancer surgery from April 1, 2003, to March 30, 2008.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Eight measures were identified: (1) total mastectomy rate; (2) close (&lt;1 mm) and positive margin rate following initial partial mastectomy; (3) number of operations required in breast conservation; (4) number of nodes obtained from sentinel lymph node biopsy; (5) number of nodes from axillary dissection; (6) proportion of patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy undergoing axillary dissection; (7) use of intraoperative lymph node assessment; and (8) time from diagnosis to surgery.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Nine hundred ten operations (218 for ductal carcinoma in situ, 692 for invasive breast cancer) were performed by 6 surgeons. Variation existed among surgeons in the combined close and positive margin rate, number of nodes obtained from sentinel lymph node biopsy, and use of intraoperative lymph node assessment. No significant variation was seen for the overall mastectomy rate, mean number of operations, positive margin rate alone, and number of lymph nodes from axillary dissection.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Quality indicators for breast cancer surgery can be identified and readily monitored. Outcome variation exists at a high-volume breast center. Further study into the causes and effects of this variation on short- and long-term patient outcomes as well as health care costs is needed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCahill, L. E., Privette, A., James, T., Sheehey-Jones, J., Ratliff, J., Majercik, D., Krag, D. N., Stanley, M., Harlow, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Breast Cancer, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.56</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Quality Measures for Breast Cancer Surgery: Initial Validation of Feasibility and Assessment of Variation Among Surgeons]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>462</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>455</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/462?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Quality Measures for Breast Cancer Surgery--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/462?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quinlan, R. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Breast Cancer, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.57</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Quality Measures for Breast Cancer Surgery--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>463</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>462</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/465?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Limited Value of Adrenal Biopsy in the Evaluation of Adrenal Neoplasm: A Decade of Experience]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/465?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the value of percutaneous adrenal biopsy in the evaluation of adrenal neoplasm.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> All adult patients undergoing image-guided adrenal biopsy from 1997 to 2007.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Biopsy sensitivity for malignancy.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> There were 163 biopsies performed on 154 patients. Mean (SD) age was 66 (12.5) years. Eighty-eight biopsies (53.4%) were performed in patients with a prior diagnosis of cancer. Forty-five (26.4%) were performed when imaging study results suggested previously undiagnosed cancer with a simultaneous adrenal metastasis. Thirty (20.2%) were performed for isolated adrenal incidentalomas. Rates of positive biopsy results in these 3 groups were 70.6%, 69.0%, and 16.7%, respectively. Prebiopsy evaluation for pheochromocytoma was performed in less than 5% of patients with established or suspected nonadrenal malignancies and 32% of patients with incidentalomas. In patients with isolated adrenal incidentaloma, a radiology report recommended biopsy 33% of the time for characteristics inconsistent with benign adenoma. Benign incidentalomas measured mean (SD) 4.2 (2.1) cm (range, 1.4-10.7 cm), and malignancies measured mean (SD) 9.3 (3.3) cm (range, 5.3-14 cm) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05). All incidentalomas 5 cm or less (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;18) were benign. There were 4 false-negative biopsy results: 3 adrenocortical carcinomas and 1 pheochromocytoma.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Biopsy is unhelpful in patients with isolated adrenal incidentaloma. Despite atypical radiographic findings, all nonfunctioning nodules 5 cm or less were benign. The negative predictive value is unacceptably low and cannot be relied on to rule out malignancy. The value of biopsy remains the diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma in patients with a nonadrenal primary malignancy, proven by the more than 70% positive rate in this group.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mazzaglia, P. J., Monchik, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Endocrine Diseases, Endocrine Diseases, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.59</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Limited Value of Adrenal Biopsy in the Evaluation of Adrenal Neoplasm: A Decade of Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>470</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/472?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Living Donor Kidney Transplantation With Multiple Arteries: Recent Increase in Modern Era of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/472?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To compare the outcome of living donor kidney transplantation using allografts with a single artery with that observed in recipients of allografts with multiple arteries.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Three hundred fifty patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation from January 2000 to March 2007.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> Living donor kidney transplantation.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Surgical complications and allograft survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Three hundred nineteen allografts (91.1%) had a single artery (group 1) and 31 (8.9%) had multiple arteries (group 2), including 2 arteries in 21 grafts (67.8%), 3 arteries in 6 (19.3%), and 4 arteries in 4 grafts (12.9%). The operative time was shorter in group 1 compared with group 2 (mean [SD], 173 [35] vs 259 [48] minutes; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). The overall surgical complication rate in groups 1 and 2 was comparable (9.6% vs 9.7%; vascular, 2.8% vs 3.2%; urological, 1.6% vs 3.2%; symptomatic lymphocele, 2.8% vs 3.2%; and wound infections, 2.8% vs 3.2%). The actuarial 1- and 5-year allograft survival rates were comparable in both groups (98.4% and 91.5% in group 1 and 96.8% and 87.1% in group 2). A significant increased use of allografts with multiple arteries has been observed in recent years: 7.8% (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;10) in grafts that were procured by open technique (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;127), 4.1% (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;5) during our initial experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;123), and 16% (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;16) in the most recent 100 cases (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Living donor kidney transplantation in the presence of multiple renal arteries is feasible and safe. Additionally, graft survival and graft function are not adversely affected by the presence of multiple renal arteries in grafts procured laparoscopically. Recently, there has been an increased use of kidneys with multiple arteries with excellent results.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saidi, R., Kawai, T., Kennealey, P., Tsouflas, G., Elias, N., Hertl, M., Cosimi, A. B., Ko, D. S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Renal Diseases, Renal Diseases, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Transplantation, Transplantation, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.49</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Living Donor Kidney Transplantation With Multiple Arteries: Recent Increase in Modern Era of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>475</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>472</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/476?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PAPER: Harvey Cushing and the New England Surgical Society]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/476?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Harvey W. Cushing, MD, is the most renowned surgeon in American history. Every aspect of his career including his many accomplishments&mdash;articles, essays, and vast correspondence&mdash;has been documented and analyzed and is the subject of at least 4 biographies and numerous articles and reminisces. Despite this scrutiny, and given his active involvement in national and international surgical and scientific organizations, his relationship with the New England Surgical Society was tenuous at best and has not been examined.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldfarb, W. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Neurosurgery, Surgery, Other, Humanities, History of Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.38</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PAPER: Harvey Cushing and the New England Surgical Society]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>479</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>476</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Paper</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/481?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/481?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costi, R., Bataille, N., Cazaban, A., Montariol, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Pain, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Diagnosis, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Computed Tomography, Ultrasonography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.64-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>481</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>481</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Pain, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Diagnosis, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Computed Tomography, Ultrasonography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.64-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>482</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/483?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/483?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aziz, F., Babu, S., Sullivan, T., Laskowski, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Other, Pain, Cardiovascular System, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.50-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>483</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>483</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/484?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/5/484?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-18</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Other, Pain, Cardiovascular System, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.50-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>484</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>484</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/301?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/301?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>301</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>301</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Welcome to Our First Video and to Archives on the Web]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zenilman, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Internet, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgery, Other, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Humanities, Medicine and the Media]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.32</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Welcome to Our First Video and to Archives on the Web]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>304</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/304?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Maintenance of Certification]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/304?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.304</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Maintenance of Certification]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>304</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>304</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Call for Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/305?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Development of an Online Morbidity, Mortality, and Near-Miss Reporting System to Identify Patterns of Adverse Events in Surgical Patients]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/305?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To design a Web-based system to track adverse and near-miss events, to establish an automated method to identify patterns of events, and to assess the adverse event reporting behavior of physicians.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> A Web-based system was designed to collect physician-reported adverse events including weekly Morbidity and Mortality (M&amp;M) entries and anonymous adverse/near-miss events. An automated system was set up to help identify event patterns. Adverse event frequency was compared with hospital databases to assess reporting completeness.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> A metropolitan tertiary care center.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Identification of adverse event patterns and completeness of reporting.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> From September 2005 to August 2007, 15&nbsp;524 surgical patients were reported including 957 (6.2%) adverse events and 34 (0.2%) anonymous reports. The automated pattern recognition system helped identify 4 event patterns from M&amp;M reports and 3 patterns from anonymous/near-miss reporting. After multidisciplinary meetings and expert reviews, the patterns were addressed with educational initiatives, correction of systems issues, and/or intensive quality monitoring. Only 25% of complications and 42% of inpatient deaths were reported. A total of 75.2% of adverse events resulting in permanent disability or death were attributed to the nature of the disease. Interventions to improve reporting were largely unsuccessful.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> We have developed a user-friendly Web-based system to track complications and identify patterns of adverse events. Underreporting of adverse events and attributing the complication to the nature of the disease represent a problem in reporting culture among surgeons at our institution. Similar systems should be used by surgery departments, particularly those affiliated with teaching hospitals, to identify quality improvement opportunities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bilimoria, K. Y., Kmiecik, T. E., DaRosa, D. A., Halverson, A., Eskandari, M. K., Bell, R. H., Soper, N. J., Wayne, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Internet, Informatics, Other, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.5</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Development of an Online Morbidity, Mortality, and Near-Miss Reporting System to Identify Patterns of Adverse Events in Surgical Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>305</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/311?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Development of an Online Morbidity, Mortality, and Near-Miss Reporting System to Identify Patterns of Adverse Events in Surgical Patients--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/311?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Makary, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Informatics/ Internet in Medicine, Internet, Informatics, Other, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.6</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Development of an Online Morbidity, Mortality, and Near-Miss Reporting System to Identify Patterns of Adverse Events in Surgical Patients--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>311</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/312?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Results of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese vs Superobese Patients: Similar Body Weight Loss, Correction of Comorbidities, and Improvement of Quality of Life]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/312?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Gastric bypass corrects comorbidities and quality of life similarly in superobese (SO) and morbidly obese (MO) patients despite higher residual weight in SO patients.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective cohort study comparing results of primary laparoscopic gastric bypass in MO and SO patients.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospital and community hospital with common bariatric programs.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 492 MO and 133 SO patients treated consecutively between January 1, 1999, and June 30, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Operative morbidity, weight loss, residual body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), evolution of comorbidities, quality of life, and Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System score.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Surgery was longer in SO patients, but operative morbidity was similar. The MO patients lost a maximum of 15 BMI units and maintained an average loss of 13 BMI units after 6 years, compared with 21 and 17 in SO patients, which corresponds to a 30.1% and 30.7% total body weight loss, respectively. After 6 years, the BMI was less than 35 in more than 90% of MO patients but in less than 50% of SO patients. Despite these differences, improvements in quality of life and comorbidities were impressive and similar in both groups.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Although many SO patients remain in the severely obese or MO category, equivalent improvements in quality of life and obesity-related comorbidities indicate that weight loss is not all that matters after bariatric surgery.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suter, M., Calmes, J.-M., Paroz, A., Romy, S., Giusti, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Life, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.19</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Results of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese vs Superobese Patients: Similar Body Weight Loss, Correction of Comorbidities, and Improvement of Quality of Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>318</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>312</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/318?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Results of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese vs Superobese Patients--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/318?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gould, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.13</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Results of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese vs Superobese Patients--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>318</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>318</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/319?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Bariatric Surgery Outcomes at Designated Centers of Excellence vs Nondesignated Programs]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/319?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To compare outcomes of patients undergoing bariatric procedures in hospitals designated as centers of excellence compared with nondesignated hospitals.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> The 2005 National Inpatient Survey was used to compare outcomes at designated vs nondesignated hospitals. In addition to conventional null-hypothesis statistical testing to assess differences, effect sizes were calculated to estimate the clinical significance for observed differences.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Centers of excellence performed substantially more operations than nondesignated centers. Despite this, outcomes were equivalent at centers of excellence and hospitals without this designation. Volume-outcome modeling attempting to identify the optimal number for a minimum volume threshold for bariatric operations revealed that annual procedure volume has a weak effect on outcomes. Similarly, many variables that were statistically significantly different between centers and noncenters proved to be clinically unimportant by effect size analysis. Risk adjustment was effectively achieved by using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality&ndash;supplied variables all-payer severity-adjusted diagnostic related group expected charges and deaths.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Designation as a bariatric surgery center of excellence does not ensure better outcomes. Neither does high annual procedure volume. Extra expenses associated with center of excellence designation may not be warranted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Livingston, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient Education/ Health Literacy, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other, Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Quality of Life, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.23</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Bariatric Surgery Outcomes at Designated Centers of Excellence vs Nondesignated Programs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>319</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/325?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Bariatric Surgery Outcomes at Designated Centers of Excellence vs Nondesignated Programs--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/325?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frencher, S., Bilimoria, K. Y., Ko, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient Education/ Health Literacy, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other, Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Quality of Life, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.18</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Bariatric Surgery Outcomes at Designated Centers of Excellence vs Nondesignated Programs--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/326?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Expert Consensus vs Empirical Estimation of Injury Severity: Effect on Quality Measurement in Trauma]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/326?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the extent to which the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Trauma Mortality Probability Model (T-MPM), a new trauma injury score based on empirical injury severity estimates, agree on hospital quality.</p>
<p><b>Design, Setting, and Patients&nbsp;</b> Retrospective cohort study based on 66&nbsp;214 patients in 68 hospitals. Four risk-adjustment models based on either ISS or T-MPM were constructed, with or without physiologic information.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Hospital quality was measured using the ratio of the observed-to-expected mortality rates. Pairwise comparisons of hospital quality based on ISS<SUB>augmented</SUB> vs T-MPM<SUB>augmented</SUB> were performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the  statistic.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> There was almost perfect agreement for the ratios of the observed to expected mortality rates based on the T-MPM vs the ISS when physiologic information was included in the model (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93). There was substantial agreement on which hospitals were identified as high-, intermediate-, and low-quality hospitals (&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.79). Excluding physiologic information decreased the level of agreement between the T-MPM and the ISS (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88 and &nbsp;=&nbsp;0.58).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The choice of expert-based or empirical Abbreviated Injury Score severity scores for individual injuries does not seem to have a significant effect on hospital quality measurement when physiologic information is included in the prediction model. This finding should help to convince all stakeholders that the quality of trauma care can be accurately measured and has face validity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glance, L. G., Osler, T. M., Mukamel, D. B., Meredith, W., Dick, A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.8</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Expert Consensus vs Empirical Estimation of Injury Severity: Effect on Quality Measurement in Trauma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>326</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/332?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Expert Consensus vs Empirical Estimation of Injury Severity--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/332?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mabry, C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.581</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Expert Consensus vs Empirical Estimation of Injury Severity--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>332</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>332</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/333?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Contained Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery: Are We Too Slow to Act?]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/333?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Contained and free anastomotic leaks, which occur in a small percentage of patients after colorectal surgery, are different clinical entities and consequently should be managed differently.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective medical record review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic medical center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Patients who underwent colectomy with primary anastomosis (N&nbsp;=&nbsp;4019) between January 1, 1992, and December 13, 2004, were eligible for participation in the study. Fifty-eight patients (1.5%) with an anastomotic leak demonstrated by communication between the collection and the gastrointestinal tract were identified. Twenty-eight of the patients had free leaks and 30 had contained leaks.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Time to presentation, symptoms at presentation, rates of reexploration, and in-hospital mortality.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Baseline characteristics, presenting symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory values were similar between patients with contained and free leaks. Almost all patients with free leaks were taken directly to the operating room, whereas those with contained leaks were initially more likely to be treated nonoperatively. However, 24 of the 28 patients with contained leaks (86%) ultimately required surgical intervention. In-hospital mortality was the same in both groups (18% in the contained leak group and 17% in the free leak group).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> In patients with contained leaks who have documented communication between the abscess cavity and the bowel, there is no difference in the rate of operative management or morbidity and mortality when compared with those with free leaks. This finding suggests that the categorization of leaks as free or contained may not be justified and argues for early operative intervention even in patients with contained leaks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damrauer, S. M., Bordeianou, L., Berger, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.589</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Contained Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery: Are We Too Slow to Act?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>338</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>333</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/338?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Contained Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/338?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Livingston, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.588</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Contained Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>338</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>338</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/339?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Long-term Survival After Surgery for Primary Hepatic Sarcoma in Adults]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/339?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Patients with primary hepatic sarcomas benefit from resection, with possible long-term cure.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective and prospective cohort study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospitals of Hamburg-Eppendorf and D&uuml;sseldorf, Germany.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Between 1985 and 2006, 22 patients (8 men and 14 women; median age at initial diagnosis, 54 years [range, 19-80 years]) were surgically treated for primary hepatic sarcomas.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Tumor resection with curative intent ranging from nonanatomical resection to liver transplant.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Effects on overall survival were analyzed using the log-rank test.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The majority of tumors were more than 5 cm (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;19), with a median tumor size of 7 cm (range, 4-14 cm); of intermediate differentiation (G2; n&nbsp;=&nbsp;15); and classified as leiomyosarcoma (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;7). Ten patients received a hemihepatectomy. In 4 patients, a bisegmentectomy was performed and in 2 patients, a segmentectomy, while 4 patients received a nonanatomical resection. Liver transplant was performed in 2 patients. In 18 patients, complete tumor resection (R0) was achieved. Perioperative mortality was 0%. Median follow-up was 88 months (range, 6-246 months). Local recurrence occurred in 6 patients. Distant metastases were diagnosed in 10 patients, predominantly in the lung (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;6). The 5-year survival after surgery was 65%, with 41% of the patients living more than 10 years without disease. Patients with angiosarcoma had a poor prognosis (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Although primary hepatic sarcoma is a rare malignant tumor, no standard treatment is established. A long-term survival is possible after complete tumor resection in a preselected population with early-stage disease.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthaei, H., Krieg, A., Schmelzle, M., Boelke, E., Poremba, C., Rogiers, X., Knoefel, W. T., Peiper, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ultrasonography, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.30</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Long-term Survival After Surgery for Primary Hepatic Sarcoma in Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>344</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>339</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/344?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Long-term Survival After Surgery for Primary Hepatic Sarcoma in Adults--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/344?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kemeny, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ultrasonography, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.31</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Long-term Survival After Surgery for Primary Hepatic Sarcoma in Adults--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>344</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>344</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/345?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Treatment Strategy for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas Based on Malignant Predictive Factors]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/345?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Noninvasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) have a favorable prognosis; however, the prognosis of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (invasive IPMC) is poor. Identification of predictive factors for differentiating IPMC from benign IPMNs would assist in providing appropriate treatment.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective study (1999-2006).</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Fifty-four patients with IPMN who underwent surgery; histologic examination showed benign adenomas in 29, carcinoma in situ in 14, and invasive carcinoma in 11 patients.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Clinical data, preoperative imaging findings, cytologic findings, tumor markers in serum and pancreatic juice, and overall survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Age of 70 years or older, presence of mural nodules, mural nodule size of 5 mm or larger, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level in pancreatic juice of 110 ng/mL or higher (as obtained by preoperative endoscopic retrograde pancreatography) were predictive of a malignant IPMN by univariate analysis, and a CEA level of 110 ng/mL or higher in pancreatic juice was identified as the only independent predictive factor for the malignant entity. The presence of jaundice or body weight loss, main pancreatic duct type, presence of mural nodules, mural nodule size of 5 mm or larger, and CEA level in the pancreatic juice of 110 ng/mL or higher were all predictive of invasive IPMCs by univariate analysis.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Measurement of the CEA level in pancreatic juice should be considered in the diagnosis of IPMC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hirono, S., Tani, M., Kawai, M., Ina, S., Nishioka, R., Miyazawa, M., Fujita, Y., Uchiyama, K., Yamaue, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Treatment Strategy for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas Based on Malignant Predictive Factors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>349</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>345</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Treatment Strategy for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas Based on Malignant Predictive Factors--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adams, D. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.590</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Treatment Strategy for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas Based on Malignant Predictive Factors--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>350</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/350?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ANNOUNCEMENT: New International Advisory Board Members Announcement]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/350?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.25</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ANNOUNCEMENT: New International Advisory Board Members Announcement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>350</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>350</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/351?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Influence of Overweight on Patients With Gastric Cancer After Undergoing Curative Gastrectomy: An Analysis of 689 Consecutive Cases Managed by a Single Center]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/351?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Overweight (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], &ge;25.0) has an effect on surgical results, postoperative complications, and long-term survival in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective study from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 2002.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Wakayama Medical University Hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> This study included 689 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy (R0). Patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy, gastrectomy with pancreaticoduodenectomy, gastrectomy with another organ resection (liver, colon, or ovary), or gastrectomy with thoracotomy were not included.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Duration of operation, amount of blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, and survival analysis.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The mean (SD) duration of the operation was longer in the overweight group (315 [75] minutes) than in the normal-weight group (277 [85] minutes) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). The mean (SD) intraoperative blood loss was larger in the overweight group (882 [764] mL) than in the normal-weight group (536 [410] mL) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). The rates of postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, pancreatic fistula, and intra-abdominal abscess) were significantly higher in the overweight group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that postoperative complications were significantly associated with being overweight (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01) and with undergoing pancreatectomy (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03). Disease-specific and overall survival did not show any significant difference between the 2 groups.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Being overweight is not a poor risk factor for survival in patients with gastric cancer, although it is independently predictive of postoperative complications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ojima, T., Iwahashi, M., Nakamori, M., Nakamura, M., Naka, T., Ishida, K., Ueda, K., Katsuda, M., Iida, T., Tsuji, T., Yamaue, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Public Health, Obesity, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.20</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Influence of Overweight on Patients With Gastric Cancer After Undergoing Curative Gastrectomy: An Analysis of 689 Consecutive Cases Managed by a Single Center]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>358</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>351</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/358?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Influence of Overweight on Patients With Gastric Cancer After Undergoing Curative Gastrectomy--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/358?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, L. T.-H., Berger, D. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Public Health, Obesity, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.15</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Influence of Overweight on Patients With Gastric Cancer After Undergoing Curative Gastrectomy--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>358</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>358</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/359?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen Therapy and Surgical Site Infection: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/359?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which high inspired oxygen concentrations were compared with standard concentrations to assess the effect on the development of surgical site infections (SSIs).</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> A systematic literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases and included a manual search of references of original articles, poster presentations, and abstracts from major meetings ("gray" literature).</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> Twenty-one of 2167 articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 5 randomized controlled trials (3001 patients) assessed the effect of perioperative supplemental oxygen use on the SSI rate. Studies used a treatment-inspired oxygen concentration of 80%. Maximum follow-up was 30 days.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> Data were abstracted by 3 independent reviewers using a standardized data collection form. Relative risks were reported using a fixed-effects model. Results were subjected to publication bias testing and sensitivity analyses.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> Infection rates were 12.0% in the control group and 9.0% in the hyperoxic group, with relative risk reduction of 25.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1%-40.1%) and absolute risk reduction of 3.0% (1.1%-5.3%). The overall risk ratio was 0.742 (95% CI, 0.599-0.919; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.006). The benefit from increasing oxygen concentration was greater in colorectal-specific procedures, with a risk ratio of 0.556 (95% CI, 0.383-0.808; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.002).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Perioperative supplemental oxygen therapy exerts a significant beneficial effect in the prevention of SSIs. We recommend its use along with maintenance of normothermia, meticulous glycemic control, and preservation of intravascular volume perioperatively in the prevention of SSIs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qadan, M., Akca, O., Mahid, S. S., Hornung, C. A., Polk, H. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Review]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen Therapy and Surgical Site Infection: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>366</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>359</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/366?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen Therapy and Surgical Site Infection--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/366?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Napolitano, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Review]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.4</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen Therapy and Surgical Site Infection--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>367</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>366</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/368?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[RESIDENT'S FORUM: Completion Pancreatectomy for Treatment of a Clostridium perfringens Pancreatic Infection]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/368?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Pancreatic infection is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Drainage of the infection is the usual therapeutic approach. <I>Clostridium perfringens</I> infection can cause fulminant sepsis, but it rarely occurs within the pancreas. The case of a 76-year-old man with cystic pancreatic lesions in which sepsis developed after endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration biopsy is described. The sepsis was managed with pancreatic resection and antibiotics. <I>Clostridium perfringens</I> was isolated from blood cultures and microbiologic smears from the pancreas. Invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with lymph node involvement was identified on histologic examination. The patient made a complete recovery from surgery without complications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cherenfant, J., Nikfarjam, M., Mathew, A., Kimchi, E. T., Staveley-O'Carroll, K. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.17</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[RESIDENT'S FORUM: Completion Pancreatectomy for Treatment of a Clostridium perfringens Pancreatic Infection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>370</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>368</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Resident's Forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/371?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Stress and Burnout Among Surgeons: Understanding and Managing the Syndrome and Avoiding the Adverse Consequences]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/371?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balch, C. M., Freischlag, J. A., Shanafelt, T. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other, Psychiatry, Depression, Stress, Suicide, Public Health, Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Surgery, Other, Transplantation, Transplantation, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.575</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL ARTICLE: Stress and Burnout Among Surgeons: Understanding and Managing the Syndrome and Avoiding the Adverse Consequences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>376</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>371</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/377?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/377?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankel, T. L., Gauger, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.7-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>377</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>377</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/378?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/378?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.7-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>378</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>378</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fischer, C., Nagel, H., Metzger, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.11-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>379</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.11-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>380</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[RESEARCH LETTERS: Fluorescent Cholangiography Using Indocyanine Green for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Initial Experience]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ishizawa, T., Bandai, Y., Kokudo, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.9</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[RESEARCH LETTERS: Fluorescent Cholangiography Using Indocyanine Green for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Initial Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>382</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Letters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/382?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Sham-Feed or Sham?]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/382?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parnaby, C. N., MacDonald, A. J., Jenkins, J. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.33</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Sham-Feed or Sham?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>382</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>382</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/382-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Criterion Standard Should Be Medical Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/382-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spence, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Other, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.16</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Criterion Standard Should Be Medical Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>383</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>382</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/383?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRECTION: Error in Reference in: Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Care: The Unresolved Problem]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/4/383?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.29</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRECTION: Error in Reference in: Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Care: The Unresolved Problem]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>383</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>383</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/204?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/204?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>204</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>204</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/206?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Image Is Everything]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/206?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freischlag, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Radiologic Imaging, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.546</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[EDITORIAL: Image Is Everything]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>206</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/206-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Maintenance of Certification]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/206-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.144.3.206</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CALL FOR PAPERS: Maintenance of Certification]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>206</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Call for Papers</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/207?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: Hybrid Cardiac Surgery: A Resident's Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/207?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bajona, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.576</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[COMMENTARY: Hybrid Cardiac Surgery: A Resident's Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>207</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Multi-institutional Experience Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrix for Ventral Hernia Repair in a Compromised Surgical Field]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> A complex ventral hernia repair (CVHR) involves a compromised surgical field where gastrointestinal, biliary, and genitourinary procedures are performed. Complex ventral hernia is a significant problem in trauma, emergency, and elective general surgery in which prosthetic material is contraindicated. In this clinical scenario, primary fascia closure carries a 50% risk of developing a hernia. The other option is a planned ventral hernia with delayed repair.</p>
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Human acellular dermal matrix is a suitable implant for CVHR in a compromised surgical field.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Multi-institutional, 5-year retrospective review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Four academic medical centers.</p>
<p><b>Patients and Methods&nbsp;</b> Each center obtained institutional review board approval. Patients included in the review had undergone CVHR with human acellular dermal matrix. Data collected included age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), comorbidities, size of fascial defect, wound classification, hospital length of stay, length of follow-up, and mortality. Primary outcomes were surgical site infection, fistula recurrence, and hernia recurrence. Both <sup>2</sup> and logistic regression analyses were performed.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Two hundred forty patients met the study criteria. Their mean (SD) age was 52.2 (15.0) years, and 132 (55.0%) were men. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (115 patients [47.9%]), and the mean defect size was 201 cm<sup>2</sup>. The mean hospital length of stay was 17.2 days, and the mean follow-up was 317 days. The overall mortality was 2.9%. The hernia recurrence rate was 17.1% (41 patients). Repair of a fistula or stoma was associated with hernia recurrence (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03) and with fistula recurrence (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated surgical site infection and body mass index of greater than 30 to be independent risks of hernia recurrence.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Human acellular dermal matrix is a suitable alternative for CVHR in a compromised surgical field. The hernia recurrence rate with human acellular dermal matrix in a compromised surgical field is less than that seen with primary repair, offering additional and improved surgical options for CVHR in this group of patients. Stoma or fistula takedown at the time of CVHR continues to be associated with significant complications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diaz, J. J., Conquest, A. M., Ferzoco, S. J., Vargo, D., Miller, P., Wu, Y.-C., Donahue, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Urology, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.12</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Multi-institutional Experience Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrix for Ventral Hernia Repair in a Compromised Surgical Field]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/216?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Influence of Obesity on Cancer-Related Outcomes After Pancreatectomy to Treat Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/216?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine the influence of obesity, as measured by body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), on clinicopathologic factors and survival after pancreatectomy to treat adenocarcinoma.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review and statistical analysis using prospectively collected data.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Referral center with a dedicated multidisciplinary pancreas cancer program.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Two hundred eighty-five consecutive patients with data available for BMI calculation who underwent potentially curative pancreas resection to treat adenocarcinoma from January 1, 1999, to October 31, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Influence of BMI and other known prognostic variables on the incidence of lymph node metastasis and disease-free and overall survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> We identified a subset of obese patients (BMI >35) who were at 12-fold risk of lymph node metastasis compared with nonobese patients (BMI &le;35). The estimated disease-free and overall survival rates were decreased in the obese patients, and the risk of cancer recurrence and death after pancreatectomy was nearly twice that in nonobese patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Obese patients with a BMI of more than 35 are more likely to have node-positive pancreatic cancer and decreased survival after surgical resection. Data suggest that the negative influence of BMI of more than 35 on cancer-related end points is unrelated to the potential complexity of performing major oncologic surgery in obese patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fleming, J. B., Gonzalez, R. J., Petzel, M. Q. B., Lin, E., Morris, J. S., Gomez, H., Lee, J. E., Crane, C. H., Pisters, P. W. T., Evans, D. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Public Health, Obesity, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.580</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Influence of Obesity on Cancer-Related Outcomes After Pancreatectomy to Treat Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/222?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Combined Aortic Debranching and Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (TEVAR) Effective but at a Cost]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/222?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To compare hybrid repair (HR) (aortic debranching and TEVAR) with conventional open thoracoabdominal and aortic arch repairs (OR), including a cost analysis.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective cohort.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Thirty patients with thoracoabdominal aneurysms were evaluated between November 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> There were 18 HRs and 12 ORs. Aortic abnormalities included the arch, visceral aorta, and arch/visceral aorta combined. Aortic debranching with TEVAR (HR) was performed at a single setting. Dacron grafts were used for OR, and branch vessels were bypassed. Hospital costs and reimbursements were obtained from the finance department.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Perioperative morbidity, mortality, and cost.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Patients were significantly older in the HR group (mean [SD], 72 [8.9] vs 58 [17.4] years, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.2). The HR group had significantly less blood loss (mean [SD], 1.7 [2.3] vs 4.8 [3.1] L, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.004), transfusions (5.1 [5.9] vs 14.7 [7.8] units, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.001), renal failure (0% vs 42.0%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.002), and pulmonary morbidity (17% vs 67%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001); shorter intensive care unit stays (5.2 [4.8] vs 16.4 [12.9] days, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.005); and shorter hospital length of stay (mean [SD], 11.6 [6.2] vs 20.8 [10.8] days, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). There were no differences in mortality or spinal cord ischemia. There was no difference in mean direct hospital costs (HR: $59&nbsp;435.70 vs OR: $49&nbsp;341; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.35). However, the mean cost margin per case was &ndash;34% for HR and +6.2% for OR (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Improved clinical outcomes are seen after HR despite treatment of an older, sicker patient population. However, HR ultimately comes at a significant cost to the hospital, with a 34% loss in revenue per case.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murphy, E. H., Beck, A. W., Clagett, G. P., DiMaio, J. M., Jessen, M. E., Arko, F. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Other, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.3</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Combined Aortic Debranching and Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (TEVAR) Effective but at a Cost]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair After Solid-Organ Transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) is efficacious in transplant recipients.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Thirty-one transplant recipients who underwent LIHR between July 9, 2004, and October 27, 2005.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Operative complications and incisional hernia recurrence.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The mean (SD) mesh size required for LIHR was 611 (307) cm<sup>2</sup>. Median (range) hospital stay was 4 (1-28) days, with follow-up of 589 (22-953) days. Eighteen patients developed a postoperative complication, most frequently seroma formation, which occurred in 13 patients (72%). The mesh size required for LIHR was significantly larger in patients with a postoperative complication (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;18; 706 [319] cm<sup>2</sup> vs n&nbsp;=&nbsp;13; 480 [244] cm<sup>2</sup>; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04). Seroma formation was not associated with previous open hernia repair, diabetes mellitus, or corticosteroid use. No statistically significant relationship was noted between the transplanted organ and seroma development. There were no post-LIHR wound infections. In 7 patients (23%), hernia recurred.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in solid-organ transplant recipients is associated with a high rate of seroma formation but minimal long-term morbidity. The recurrence rate after LIHR is equivalent to that after open hernia repair. These results suggest that LIHR is a safe and effective alternative to open repair in this patient population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kennealey, P. T., Johnson, C. S., Tector, A. J., Selzer, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Transplantation, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.571</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair After Solid-Organ Transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/233?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair After Solid-Organ Transplantation--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/233?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Vera, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Transplantation, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Other, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.144.3.233</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair After Solid-Organ Transplantation--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>233</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Bowel Endometriosis: Feasibility, Complications, and Clinical Outcome]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis.</p>
<p><b>Design and Patients&nbsp;</b> This study included 357 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal resection. We evaluated intraoperative and postoperative complications, symptom outcomes, and long-term follow-up.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Three hundred forty-three patients (96.1%) underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection, and radical endometriosis ablation was in 334 patients (93.6%).</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Fourteen (3.9%) required laparoconversion. Median operating time was 300 (range, 85-720) minutes, with a median estimated blood loss of 250 (range, 50-550) mL. Radical endometriosis ablation was achieved in 334 patients (93.6%). Median ileus was 4 (range, 1-8) days, with a median postoperative hospitalization of 8 (range, 3-36) days. Early and late complications were observed in 44 patients (12.3%) and, in 35 of these (79.5%), surgical management was necessary. Median follow-up after colorectal resection was 19.6 (range, 6-48) months. The median preoperative and postoperative dyspareunia scores were 8 (range, 4-10) and 3 (range, 0-10), respectively (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.04), and the median preoperative and postoperative gastrointestinal tract symptom scores were 7 (range, 2-10) and 2 (range, 0-10), respectively (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05). During follow-up, 24 of 286 recurrences (8.4%) were registered. Patients who previously underwent surgery for endometriosis showed a higher risk of recurrence compared with patients undergoing primary surgery (13.2% vs 3.4%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.048).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Laparoscopic colorectal resection for severe endometriosis is feasible and markedly improved endometriosis-related symptoms. Despite the risk of major postoperative complications, the procedure shows good results in terms of recurrence rate and could be adopted as the primary approach for patients with symptomatic colorectal infiltrating endometriosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minelli, L., Fanfani, F., Fagotti, A., Ruffo, G., Ceccaroni, M., Mereu, L., Landi, S., Pomini, P., Scambia, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.555</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Bowel Endometriosis: Feasibility, Complications, and Clinical Outcome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/239?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Bowel Endometriosis--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/239?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galandiuk, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.579</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Bowel Endometriosis--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>239</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>239</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/241?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Pretransplantation Patient Characteristics and Survival Following Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/241?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Pretransplantation patient characteristics determine survival following combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Time-to-event analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic research.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> The United Network for Organ Sharing provided deidentified patient-level data. Analysis included 19&nbsp;373 heart transplant recipients from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2005.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to identify pretransplantation recipient characteristics associated with improved long-term survival following HKT. Kaplan-Meier survival functions and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for time-to-event analysis. Using the relative risks calculated in regression analysis, weights were assigned for each risk factor, allowing for the construction of a risk score.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Among heart transplant recipients, 264 (1.4%) underwent HKT. Factors associated with diminished survival included peripheral vascular disease, recipient age older than 65 years, nonischemic etiology of heart failure, dialysis dependence at the time of transplantation, and bridge to transplantation using a ventricular assist device. After stratification by risk score, 1-year survival was 93.2% and 61.9% in the lowest- and highest-risk HKT groups, respectively. Further stratification by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was performed based on a previous study showing decreased survival of patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation with a preoperative eGFR of less than 33 mL/min. Low-risk patients with an eGFR of less than 33 mL/min undergoing HKT constituted the only group that had significantly better survival compared with isolated patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation with eGFRs and risk scores in the same range (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.006).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> When patients were stratified by risk score and by diminished eGFR (&lt;33 mL/min), low-risk HKT recipients with a diminished eGFR had improved survival following HKT over isolated heart transplant recipients. Only low-risk patients with combined kidney failure (eGFR, &lt;33 mL/min) and heart failure seem to gain a survival benefit from HKT.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russo, M. J., Rana, A., Chen, J. M., Hong, K. N., Gelijns, A., Moskowitz, A., Widmann, W. D., Ratner, L., Naka, Y., Hardy, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Cardiovascular Interventions, Other, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery, Transplantation, Cardiac Transplantation, Kidney Transplantation, Transplantation, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Cardiovascular Intervention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.559</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Pretransplantation Patient Characteristics and Survival Following Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>246</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>241</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/247?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Trends in Management and Prognosis for Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Twenty-five Years of Experience at a Single Institution]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/247?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To investigate trends in results of esophagectomies to treat esophageal cancer at a single high-volume institution during the past 25 years.</p>
<p><b>Design and Setting&nbsp;</b> Retrospective cohort study in a university tertiary referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients and Methods&nbsp;</b> Patients with cancer of the thoracic esophagus or esophagogastric junction seen from 1980 through 2004 were included (N&nbsp;=&nbsp;3493). Three time periods were defined: 1980-1987, 1988-1995, and 1996-2004.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, and morbidity, mortality, and survival rates among patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The ratio of squamous cell carcinoma to adenocarcinoma decreased from 3.3 to 1.7 (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;.001) during the study period, in parallel with an increase in the number of patients with tumors in the lower esophagus/esophagogastric junction. An increasing proportion of patients who underwent resection received neoadjuvant treatment (chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy), and 1978 patients underwent esophagectomy. The R0 resection rate increased from 74.5% to 90.1% (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;.001). In addition, an increasing proportion of patients had early-stage tumor in the resected specimen. In-hospital postoperative mortality decreased from 8.2% to 2.6% (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;.001), and the 5-year survival rate significantly improved from 18.8% to 42.3% (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;.001) for all patients who underwent resection. Pathological tumor stage, completeness of the resection, time period, sex, tumor histological type, and tumor location influenced the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> A change in location and histological type of esophageal cancer has occurred during the past 25 years. Earlier diagnosis, a multidisciplinary approach, and refinements in surgical technique and perioperative care have led to a significant reduction in postoperative mortality rate and improved long-term survival among patients with cancer of the thoracic esophagus or esophagogastric junction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruol, A., Castoro, C., Portale, G., Cavallin, F., Sileni, V. C., Cagol, M., Alfieri, R., Corti, L., Boso, C., Zaninotto, G., Peracchia, A., Ancona, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Thoracic Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.574</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Trends in Management and Prognosis for Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Twenty-five Years of Experience at a Single Institution]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/254?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Trends in Management and Prognosis for Esophageal Cancer--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/254?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McFadden, D. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Thoracic Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.560</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Trends in Management and Prognosis for Esophageal Cancer--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>254</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Effect of Laparoscopy on the Indications for Adrenalectomy]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is now the criterion standard for removal of most benign adrenal lesions and may be used for malignant lesions as well. At the same time, improved imaging has led to an increase in the number of incidentally detected adrenal masses. The aim of this study was to determine whether the introduction of laparoscopy has changed the indications for adrenalectomy.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective cohort study of patients operated on for primary adrenal disease between September 1, 1987, and August 17, 2007.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Sixty-six patients treated before (group 1) and 203 treated after (group 2) introduction of laparoscopic adrenalectomy.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Patient characteristics, comorbidity, tumor size, indication, and time between diagnosis and surgery.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Group 2 had more patients in American Society of Anesthesiologists class III with gastrointestinal and metabolic-endocrine comorbidities. Tumor size did not change, and, despite an increase in the number of adrenalectomies, indications for surgery remained consistent over time.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Despite an increased volume of procedures, the introduction of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in our hospital did not change the indications for surgical intervention.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henneman, D., Chang, Y., Hodin, R. A., Berger, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.564</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Effect of Laparoscopy on the Indications for Adrenalectomy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/259?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Effect of Laparoscopy on the Indications for Adrenalectomy--Invited Critique]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/259?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prinz, R. A., Smith, G. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.552</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[INVITED CRITIQUE: Effect of Laparoscopy on the Indications for Adrenalectomy--Invited Critique]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>259</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>259</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/261?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Impact of Radiologic Intervention on Mortality in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: The Role of Organ Failure]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/261?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Our group previously reported that organ failure and mortality in necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) are not different between patients with infected and sterile necrosis. Since that report, management of this disease has evolved to include image-guided percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) to improve morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the effect of PCD on mortality in NP.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary care referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 689 consecutive patients treated for acute pancreatitis between 2001 and 2005, of whom 64 (9.3%) had pancreatic necrosis documented on contrast-enhanced computed tomography.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Mortality and organ failure.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In the 64 patients with documented NP, overall mortality was 16%. Thirty-six patients (56%) had organ failure according to the Atlanta classification. Compared with patients with sterile necrosis, those with infected necrosis did not have an increased prevalence of organ failure or increased need for intubation, pressors, or dialysis but had an increased mortality. Mortality in patients treated conservatively was 1 of 29 (3%); in those with PCD alone, 6 of 11 (55%); in those with PCD and surgery, 2 of 17 (12%); and in those with surgery alone, 1 of 7 (14%). All patients treated with PCD alone had organ failure, whereas 10 (59%) of those with PCD and surgery had organ failure.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The use of PCD did not improve the mortality of NP among patients with organ failure.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocha, F. G., Benoit, E., Zinner, M. J., Whang, E. E., Banks, P. A., Ashley, S. W., Mortele, K. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiation Therapy, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.587</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Impact of Radiologic Intervention on Mortality in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: The Role of Organ Failure]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>265</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>261</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/266?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Long-term Outcomes of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy vs Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/266?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To assess the long-term results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) and to define the role of SH in the treatment of hemorrhoids.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> Published randomized controlled trials of CH vs SH with a minimum clinical follow-up of 12 months were searched and selected in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases using the keywords <I>hemorrhoid</I>, <I>stapl</I>, and <I>anopexy</I>, without language restrictions.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> Potentially relevant studies were identified by the title and the abstract, and full articles were obtained and assessed in detail.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> Studies were scored according to the presence of 3 key methodologic features of randomization, blinding, and accountability of all patients, including withdrawals, and the scores ranged from 0 to 5. Studies that received a score from 3 to 5 were considered high-quality studies, whereas those with a score of 2 or less were considered of low quality. A specifically designed data form was used to collect all relevant data, including details of the experimental design, patient demographics, technical aspects, outcome measures, and complications.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria for a total of 1201 patients. Outcomes at a minimum of 1 year showed a significantly higher rate of prolapse recurrences in the SH group (14 studies, 1063 patients; odds ratio, 5.5; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and patients were more likely to undergo further treatment to correct recurrent prolapses compared with the CH group (10 studies, 824 patients; odds ratio, 1.9; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is a safe technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids but carries a significantly higher incidence of recurrences and additional operations compared with CH. It is the patient's choice whether to accept a higher recurrence rate to take advantage of the short-term benefits of SH.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giordano, P., Gravante, G., Sorge, R., Ovens, L., Nastro, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Review, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.591</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Long-term Outcomes of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy vs Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>272</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>266</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/273?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Total vs Partial Fundoplication in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/273?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing partial fundoplication (PF) with total (Nissen) fundoplication (TF) for gastroesophageal reflux disease in terms of morbidity, efficacy, and long-term symptomatology.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> A structured Medline search for published studies.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> The available literature from 1975 until June 2007 was searched using the Medical Subject Headings of the National Library of Medicine term <I>fundoplication</I> and the free-text terms <I>fundoplication</I>, <I>surgery</I>, and <I>reflux</I>. Data were analyzed using Review Manager software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England).</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> Eleven trials were identified comparing TF with PF in 991 patients.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> Total fundoplication resulted in a significantly higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia (odds ratio [OR], 1.82-3.93; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), bloating (OR, 1.07-2.56; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02), and flatulence (OR, 1.66-3.96; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). No significant differences were noted in the incidence of esophagitis (OR, 0.72-2.7; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.33), heartburn (OR, 0.48-1.52; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.58), or persisting acid reflux (OR, 0.77-1.79; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.45). The reoperation rate was significantly higher after TF compared with PF (OR, 1.13-3.95; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02). No significant differences were present in the proportion of patients experiencing a good or excellent long-term outcome (OR, 0.54-1.38; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.53) or in the proportion of patients with a Visick I or II score (OR, 0.62-1.59; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.99).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Partial fundoplication is a safe and effective alternative to TF, resulting in significantly fewer reoperations and a better functional outcome. The poor quality of the included trials warrants caution in the interpretation of the results of this meta-analysis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varin, O., Velstra, B., De Sutter, S., Ceelen, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Dysphagia, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Thoracic Surgery, Review, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.10</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[REVIEW ARTICLE: Total vs Partial Fundoplication in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>278</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>273</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/279?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[RESIDENT'S FORUM: Asymptomatic Isolated Celiac Artery Dissection After a Fall]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/279?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Isolated injury to mesenteric vessels in blunt trauma is uncommon. Most patients with these injuries present with abdominal pain, shock, or laboratory evidence of bowel and/or liver ischemia. We report herein the case of a man with asymptomatic isolated celiac artery dissection after blunt trauma suspected by screening abdominal computed tomography and confirmed by catheter-based angiography. The patient was treated with 3 months of oral anticoagulation alone.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorra, A. S., Mittleider, D., Clark, D. E., Gibbs, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Thrombolysis, Cardiovascular System, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Vascular Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Blood/ Coagulation, Diagnosis, Angiology, Computed Tomography, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Cardiovascular Intervention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.22</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[RESIDENT'S FORUM: Asymptomatic Isolated Celiac Artery Dissection After a Fall]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>279</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Resident's Forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/283?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/283?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connor, L., Craig, J., Buch, K. E., Divino, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.583-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>283</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>283</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/284?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/284?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.583-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>284</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>284</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jain, A., Smith, C., Geschwind, J.-F. H., Pawlik, T. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.578-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>285</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/286?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/286?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.578-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>286</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>286</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/287?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month-Quiz Case]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/287?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poultsides, G. A., Zani, S., Bloom, G. P., Tishler, D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.551-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month-Quiz Case]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>287</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>287</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.551-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[SPECIAL FEATURE: Image of the Month--Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>288</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/289?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Total Gastrectomy]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/289?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Badruddoja, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain, Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.584</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Total Gastrectomy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>289</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/290?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Total Gastrectomy--Reply]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/290?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pacelli, F., Rosa, F., Doglietto, G. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain, Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.585</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Total Gastrectomy--Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>290</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/290-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Is Laparoscopic Colectomy a Good Operation for Colon Cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/290-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Attiyeh, F. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.566</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Is Laparoscopic Colectomy a Good Operation for Colon Cancer?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>291</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>290</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/291?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Is Laparoscopic Colectomy a Good Operation for Colon Cancer?--Reply]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/291?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bilimoria, K. Y., Ko, C. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.573</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Is Laparoscopic Colectomy a Good Operation for Colon Cancer?--Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>291</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/291-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Voluntarism and the Global Unmet Need for Surgery]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/291-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ozgediz, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education, Medical Practice, Other, Public Health, World Health, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.567</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Voluntarism and the Global Unmet Need for Surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>291</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/292?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Voluntarism and the Global Unmet Need for Surgery--Reply]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/292?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdullah, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education, Medical Practice, Other, Public Health, World Health, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.570</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: Voluntarism and the Global Unmet Need for Surgery--Reply]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>292</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/292-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: International Surgical Electives: Intellectual Capital, Authorship, and Capacity Building]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/3/292-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayanga, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-16</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship, Medical Practice, Medical Education, Medical Practice, Other, Public Health, World Health, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2008.565</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRESPONDENCE: International Surgical Electives: Intellectual Capital, Authorship, and Capacity Building]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>292</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>292</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>