<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org">
<title>Archives of Surgery recent issues</title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org</link>
<description>Archives of Surgery is an influential peer-reviewed monthly general surgery journal able to represent a full range of regional and specialty interests as the official publication of the New England Surgical Society, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, the Surgical Infection Society, and the Western Surgical Association.</description>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Surgery</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0004-0010</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/6?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/8?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/9?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/10?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/12?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/17?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/19?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/28?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/34?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/40?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/41?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/42?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/47?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/49?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/56?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/63?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/71?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/72?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/79?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/87?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/92?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/96?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/98?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/101?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/104?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/104-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/105-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1104?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1121?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1126?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1132?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1133?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1144?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1150?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1155?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1162?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1163?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1166?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1167?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1174?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1176?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1185?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1186?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1187?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1188?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/992?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/998?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1000?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1005?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1006?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1011?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1020?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1021?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1028?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1034?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1035?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1039?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1040?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1047?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1056?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1060?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1068?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1074?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1081?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1085?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1086?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1087?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1088?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1089?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/888?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/892?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/893?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/894?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/899?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/900?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/906?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/913?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/914?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/920?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/921?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/927?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/928?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/932?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/933?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/938?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/946?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/950?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/957?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/961?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/970?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/973?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/974?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/975?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/976?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/977?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/977-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/980?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif">
<title>Archives of Surgery</title>
<url>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif</url>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/6?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/6?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>6</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/8?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Our 5 Years of Achievements [Editorial]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/8?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Freischlag, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship, Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.245</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Our 5 Years of Achievements [Editorial]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>8</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/9?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Cautionary Note Regarding Safety of Thyroidectomy in the Elderly [From the Archives]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/9?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sosa, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.235</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Cautionary Note Regarding Safety of Thyroidectomy in the Elderly [From the Archives]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>10</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From the Archives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/10?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Error in Table in: Risk Factors for Recurrence After Repair of Enterocutaneous Fistula [Correction]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/10?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Error in Table in: Risk Factors for Recurrence After Repair of Enterocutaneous Fistula [Correction]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>10</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/12?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association Between a High Number of Isolated Lymph Nodes in T1 to T4 N0M0 Colorectal Cancer and the Microsatellite Instability Phenotype [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/12?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Stage I or II colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability (MSI) are characterized by more isolated lymph nodes in the resected specimen than their counterparts with microsatellite stability (MSS).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic research.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Using a pentaplex polymerase chain reaction assay, MSI status was determined prospectively for 135 operative patients.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Mismatch repair defects were investigated by immunohistochemistry on tumors demonstrating MSI.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Among 82 stage I or II colorectal carcinomas, 11 had MSI, and 71 had MSS, with a mean (SD) number of 23.6 (3.1) and 13.7 (1.0) negative lymph nodes, respectively (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.001). The mean number of lymph nodes for all resected stage I or II colorectal carcinomas analyzed at our hospital was 15. The prevalence of MSI among tumors with more than 15 lymph nodes in the specimen was 25% (9 of 36), and 82% (9 of 11) of MSI tumors belonged to this group.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> A high number of isolated lymph nodes in stage I or II colorectal carcinomas was associated with the MSI phenotype. Good prognosis that is usually associated with tumors having a high number of uninvolved lymph nodes might reflect the high prevalence of MSI among these tumors. The number of examined lymph nodes as a quality criterion should be used with caution. For stage I or stage II colorectal carcinomas, restricting MSI phenotyping to tumors with more than the mean number of lymph nodes identifies almost all MSI tumors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eveno, C., Nemeth, J., Soliman, H., Praz, F., de The, H., Valleur, P., Talbot, I. C., Pocard, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.224</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association Between a High Number of Isolated Lymph Nodes in T1 to T4 N0M0 Colorectal Cancer and the Microsatellite Instability Phenotype [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>17</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/17?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Advances in the Relationship Between Lymph Node Status and Prognosis: Comment on "Association Between a High Number of Isolated Lymph Nodes in T1 to T4 N0M0 Colorectal Cancer and the Microsatellite Instability" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/17?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berho, M., Wexner, S. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.220</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Advances in the Relationship Between Lymph Node Status and Prognosis: Comment on "Association Between a High Number of Isolated Lymph Nodes in T1 to T4 N0M0 Colorectal Cancer and the Microsatellite Instability" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>18</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/19?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Feasibility and Outcome in an Early Experience [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/19?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is a safe and effective therapeutic approach.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Single-institutional retrospective review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> All consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy from July 2007 through July 2009 at a single center (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;62).</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Blood loss, operative time, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, and 30-day or in-hospital mortality.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of 65 patients undergoing laparoscopic resection, 62 patients with a mean age of 66 years (SD, 12 years) underwent total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. The pancreaticojejunostomy consisted of a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis with interrupted suture. Median operative time was 368 minutes (range, 258-608 minutes) and median blood loss was 240 mL (range, 30-1200 mL). Diagnosis was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;31), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;12), periampullary adenocarcinoma (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;8), neuroendocrine tumor (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;4), chronic pancreatitis (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;3), cholangiocarcinoma (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;1), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;1), cystadenoma (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;1), and duodenal adenoma (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;1). Median tumor size was 3 cm (range, 0.9-10.0 cm) and the median number of lymph nodes harvested was 15 (range, 6-31). Perioperative morbidity occurred in 26 patients and included pancreatic fistula (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;11), delayed gastric emptying (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;9), bleeding (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;5), and deep vein thrombosis (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;2). There was 1 postoperative mortality. Median length of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 4-69 days).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, safe, and effective. Outcomes appear comparable with those via the open approach; however, controlled trials are needed. Despite this series representing experience within the learning curve, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy holds promise for providing advantages seen with minimally invasive approaches in other procedures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kendrick, M. L., Cusati, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.243</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Feasibility and Outcome in an Early Experience [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>23</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/28?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Randomized Trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for Common Bile Duct Stone Disease [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/28?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To compare outcome parameters for good-risk patients with classic signs, symptoms, and laboratory and abdominal imaging features of cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC+LCBDE) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP/S+LC).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Our study was a prospective trial conducted following written informed consent, with randomization by the serially numbered, opaque envelope technique.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Our institution is an academic teaching hospital and the central receiving and trauma center for the City and County of San Francisco, California.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> We randomized 122 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 or 2) meeting entry criteria. Ten of these patients, excluded from outcome analysis, were protocol violators having signed out of the hospital against medical advice before 1 or both procedures were completed.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> Treatment was preoperative ERCP/S followed by LC, or LC+LCBDE.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The primary outcome measure was efficacy of stone clearance from the common bile duct. Secondary end points were length of hospital stay, cost of index hospitalization, professional fees, hospital charges, morbidity and mortality, and patient acceptance and quality of life scores.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The baseline characteristics of the 2 randomized groups were similar. Efficacy of stone clearance was likewise equivalent for both groups. The time from first procedure to discharge was significantly shorter for LC+LCBDE (mean [SD], 55 [45] hours vs 98 [83] hours; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Hospital service and total charges for index hospitalization were likewise lower for LC+LCBDE, but the differences were not statistically significant. The professional fee charges for LC+LCBDE were significantly lower than those for ERCP/S+LC (median [SD], $4820 [1637] vs $6139 [1583]; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Patient acceptance and quality of life scores were equivalent for both groups.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Both ERCP/S+LC and LC+LCBDE were highly effective in detecting and removing common bile duct stones and were equivalent in overall cost and patient acceptance. However, the overall duration of hospitalization was shorter and physician fees lower for LC+LCBDE.</p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00807729">NCT00807729</inter-ref></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rogers, S. J., Cello, J. P., Horn, J. K., Siperstein, A. E., Schecter, W. P., Campbell, A. R., Mackersie, R. C., Rodas, A., Kreuwel, H. T. C., Harris, H. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Randomized Controlled Trial, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.226</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Randomized Trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for Common Bile Duct Stone Disease [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>33</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/34?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignant and Benign Lesions: Ten-Year Norwegian Single-Center Experience [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/34?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> The introduction of laparoscopic liver resection has been challenging because new and safe surgical techniques have had to be developed, and skepticism remains about the use of laparoscopy for malignant neoplasms. We present herein a large-volume single-center experience with laparoscopic liver resection.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Rikshospitalet University Hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> One hundred thirty-nine patients who underwent 177 laparoscopic liver resections in 149 procedures from August 18, 1998, through October 14, 2008. One hundred thirteen patients had malignant lesions, of whom 96 had colorectal metastases.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant and benign lesions.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Perioperative and oncologic outcomes and survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Five procedures (3.4%) were converted to laparotomy and 1 (0.7%) to laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation. The remaining 143 procedures were completed laparoscopically, during which 177 liver resections were undertaken, including 131 nonanatomic and 46 anatomic resections. The median operative time and blood loss were 164 (50-488) minutes and 350 (&lt;50-4000) mL, respectively. There were 10 intraoperative (6.7%) and 18 postoperative (12.6%) complications. One patient (0.7%) died. The median postoperative stay and opioid requirement were 3 (1-42) and 1 (0-11) days, respectively. Tumor-free resection margins determined by histopathologic evaluation were achieved in 140 of 149 malignant specimens (94.0%). The 5-year actuarial survival for patients undergoing procedures for colorectal metastases was 46%.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> In experienced hands, laparoscopic liver resection is a favorable alternative to open resection. Perioperative morbidity and mortality and long-term survival after laparoscopic resection of colorectal metastases appear to be comparable to those after open resections.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kazaryan, A. M., Pavlik Marangos, I., Rosseland, A. R., Rosok, B. I., Mala, T., Villanger, O., Mathisen, O., Giercksky, K.-E., Edwin, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.229</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignant and Benign Lesions: Ten-Year Norwegian Single-Center Experience [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>40</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/40?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Small Incision, Big Surgeon: Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Tumors Without a Doubt: Comment on "Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignant and Benign Lesions: Ten-Year Norwegian Single-Center Experience" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/40?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gagner, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.225</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Small Incision, Big Surgeon: Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Tumors Without a Doubt: Comment on "Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Malignant and Benign Lesions: Ten-Year Norwegian Single-Center Experience" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>41</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>40</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/41?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Error in Author Affiliations in: Downwardly Mobile: the Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured [Correction]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/41?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured, Medical Practice, Other, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.252</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Error in Author Affiliations in: Downwardly Mobile: the Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured [Correction]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>41</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/42?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recurrence and Impact of Postoperative Prophylaxis in Laparoscopically Treated Primary Ileocolic Crohn Disease [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/42?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To define risk factors for recurrence and to determine whether postoperative prophylaxis would influence time to recurrence after primary laparoscopic ileocolectomy for Crohn disease.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective record review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary academic medical center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> All patients who underwent primary laparoscopic ileocolectomy for terminal ileal Crohn disease between April 28, 1994, and August 3, 2006, at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> All patients were reviewed for follow-up, recurrence, risk factors for recurrence, and use of postoperative immunosuppressive prophylaxis.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> One hundred nine patients were identified, of whom 89 were followed up postoperatively at Mayo Clinic with a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 1.8 months to 11.9 years). Recurrence was discovered in 54 patients (61%) at a median of 13.1 months (range, 1.3 months to 8.7 years). Forty-four patients (49%) received postoperative immunosuppressive prophylaxis (37 [42%] received azathioprine, 8 [9%] received 6-mercaptopurine, and 3 [3%] received infliximab). In a multivariate model of various risk factors for recurrence, presence of granulomas was the only significant predictor of recurrence (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). The 2-year cumulative recurrence rates in the prophylaxis and nonprophylaxis groups were 37.5% and 52.6%, respectively (log-rank test, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.87).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Recurrence occurred in more than half of the patients with Crohn disease after primary laparoscopic ileocolectomy. In this highly selected patient population, use of immunosuppressive prophylaxis was not associated with a delay in recurrence. Presence of granulomas was the only significant predictor of recurrence. These findings should be further explored in larger and less selected patient populations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malireddy, K., Larson, D. W., Sandborn, W. J., Loftus, E. V., Faubion, W. A., Pardi, D. S., Qin, R., Gullerud, R. E., Cima, R. R., Wolff, B., Dozois, E. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Immunology, Immunology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.248</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recurrence and Impact of Postoperative Prophylaxis in Laparoscopically Treated Primary Ileocolic Crohn Disease [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>47</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/47?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preventing Crohn Disease Recurrence With Drugs After Ileocolectomy: An Exercise in Futility?: Comment on "Recurrence and Impact of Postoperative Prophylaxis in Laparoscopically Treated Primary Ileocolic Crohn Disease" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/47?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dayton, M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Immunology, Immunology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.249</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preventing Crohn Disease Recurrence With Drugs After Ileocolectomy: An Exercise in Futility?: Comment on "Recurrence and Impact of Postoperative Prophylaxis in Laparoscopically Treated Primary Ileocolic Crohn Disease" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>48</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/49?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival Effects of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy After Resection for Pancreatic Carcinoma [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/49?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> The survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer who have undergone surgical resection remains unclear.</p>
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To identify the additional benefit of adjuvant therapy by retrospectively examining a large population-based registry of patients who underwent definitive surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.</p>
<p><b>Design and Setting&nbsp;</b> The Florida cancer registry and state inpatient and outpatient hospital data records were queried for pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1998 and 2002.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 2877 patients who underwent surgical resection with curative intent for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Overall survival time.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Overall, 58.7% of patients were older than 65 years. Most patients were white (90.7%), were non-Hispanic (86.7%), and did not consume alcohol abusively (89.2%). Approximately half of the patients (51.9%) did not receive chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Approximately 25.0% of the patients underwent chemoradiotherapy, and 10.0% received chemotherapy alone. Patients were more frequently treated at low-volume centers (57.6%) and nonteaching facilities (72.8%). Multivariate analysis correcting for patient comorbidities demonstrated that postoperative chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.69, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04) and treatment at high-volume centers (hazard ratio&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.85, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and teaching facilities (hazard ratio&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.84, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) were independent predictors of improved survival.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was found to provide a significant additional survival benefit to surgical resection for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, this benefit is independent of the additional survival advantage when patients are treated at teaching facilities or high-volume centers. Although selection bias may be contributing to the observed differences, these data nonetheless support the use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, R., Cheung, M. C., Byrne, M. M., Jin, X., Montero, A. J., Jones, C., Koniaris, L. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Radiation Therapy, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.244</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival Effects of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy After Resection for Pancreatic Carcinoma [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>49</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/56?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is the Debate Finally Over?: Comment on "Survival Effects of Adjuvant Chemoradiation Following Chemoradiotherapy After Resection for Pancreatic Carcinoma" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/56?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahuja, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Radiation Therapy, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.241</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is the Debate Finally Over?: Comment on "Survival Effects of Adjuvant Chemoradiation Following Chemoradiotherapy After Resection for Pancreatic Carcinoma" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Decision Modeling to Estimate the Impact of Gastric Bypass Surgery on Life Expectancy for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To create a decision analytic model to estimate the balance between treatment risks and benefits for patients with morbid obesity.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Decision analytic Markov state transition model with multiple logistic regression models as inputs. Data from the 2005 National Inpatient Survey were used to calculate in-hospital mortality risk associated with bariatric surgery and then adjusted for 30-day mortality. To calculate excess mortality associated with obesity, we used the 1991-1996 National Health Interview Survey linked to the National Death Index. Bariatric surgery was assumed to influence mortality only through its impact on the excess mortality associated with obesity, and the efficacy of surgery was estimated from a recent large observational trial.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Gastric bypass surgery.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Life expectancy.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Our base case, a 42-year-old woman with a body mass index of 45, gained an additional 2.95 years of life expectancy with bariatric surgery. No surgical treatment was favored in our base case when the 30-day surgical mortality exceeded 9.5% (baseline 30-day mortality, 0.2%) or when the efficacy of bariatric surgery for reducing mortality decreased to 2% or less (baseline efficacy, 53%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The optimal decision for individual patients varies based on the balance of risk between perioperative mortality, excess annual mortality risk associated with increasing body mass index, and the efficacy of surgery; however, for the average morbidly obese patient, gastric bypass improves life expectancy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schauer, D. P., Arterburn, D. E., Livingston, E. H., Fischer, D., Eckman, M. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Interventions, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.240</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Decision Modeling to Estimate the Impact of Gastric Bypass Surgery on Life Expectancy for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>62</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/63?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of Viral Infection and Appendicitis [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/63?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> What causes appendicitis is not known; however, studies have suggested a relationship between viral diseases and appendicitis. Building on evidence of cyclic patterns of appendicitis with apparent outbreaks consistent with an infectious etiology, we hypothesized that there is a relationship between population rates of appendicitis and several infectious diseases.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Epidemiologic study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> The National Hospital Discharge Survey</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Estimated US hospitalized population.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> <I>International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification</I> discharge diagnosis codes of the National Hospital Discharge Survey were queried from 1970 to 2006 to identify admissions for appendicitis, influenza, rotavirus, and enteric infections. Cointegration analysis of time series data was used to determine if the disease incidence trends for these various disease entities varied over time together.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Rates of influenza and nonperforating appendicitis declined progressively from the late 1970s to 1995 and rose thereafter, but influenza rates exhibited more distinct seasonal variation than appendicitis rates. Rotavirus infection showed no association with the incidence of nonperforating appendicitis. Perforating appendicitis showed a dissimilar trend to both nonperforating appendicitis and viral infection. Hospital admissions for enteric infections substantially increased over the years but were not related to appendicitis cases.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Neither influenza nor rotavirus are likely proximate causes of appendicitis given the lack of a seasonal relationship between these disease entities. However, because of significant cointegration between the annual incidence rates of influenza and nonperforated appendicitis, it is possible that these diseases share common etiologic determinates, pathogenetic mechanisms, or environmental factors that similarly affect their incidence.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alder, A. C., Fomby, T. B., Woodward, W. A., Haley, R. W., Sarosi, G., Livingston, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Viral Infections, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.250</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of Viral Infection and Appendicitis [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>63</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/71?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Still Looking for Reasons in Appendicitis: Comment on "Association of Viral Infection and Appendicitis" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/71?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Britt, R. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Viral Infections, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.251</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Still Looking for Reasons in Appendicitis: Comment on "Association of Viral Infection and Appendicitis" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>71</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/72?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Improved Bariatric Surgery Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries After Implementation of the Medicare National Coverage Determination [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/72?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To compare the outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent bariatric surgery within 18 months before and after implementation of the national coverage determination (NCD) for bariatric surgery.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Analysis of the University HealthSystem Consortium database from October 1, 2004, through September 31, 2007.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> A total of 102 academic medical centers and approximately 150 of their affiliated hospitals, representing more than 90% of the nation's nonprofit academic medical centers.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Medicare and Medicaid patients who underwent bariatric surgery to treat morbid obesity.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Demographics, length of stay, 30-day readmission, morbidity, observed-to-expected mortality ratio, and costs.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 3196 bariatric procedures were performed before and 3068 after the NCD. After the implementation of the NCD, the volume of gastric banding doubled and the proportion of laparoscopic gastric bypass increased from 60.0% to 77.2%. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery after the NCD benefited from a shorter length of stay (3.5 vs 3.1 days, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and lower overall complication rates (12.2% vs 10.0%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), with no significant differences in the in-hospital mortality rates (0.28% vs 0.20%). Among Medicare patients, there was a 29.3% reduction in the number of bariatric procedures performed within the first 2 quarters after the NCD. However, the number of procedures returned to baseline volume within 1 year and exceeded baseline volume after 2 years of the NCD.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The bariatric surgery NCD resulted in improved outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries without limiting access to care for individuals with medical disability.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen, N. T., Hohmann, S., Slone, J., Varela, E., Smith, B. R., Hoyt, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.228</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Improved Bariatric Surgery Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries After Implementation of the Medicare National Coverage Determination [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>78</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/79?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Surgical Specialization on Emergency Colorectal Surgery Outcomes [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/79?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the impact of surgeon specialization on emergency colorectal resection in terms of mortality, morbidity, and type of operation performed.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Observational study from January 1, 1993, through December 31, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 1046 patients underwent emergency colorectal resection. Patients were classified into 2 groups: those operated on by a colorectal surgeon (CS) and those operated on by a general surgeon (GS).</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Preoperative variables studied were sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, associated medical disease, presentation, reason for surgery, and type of operation. Univariate relations between predictors and outcomes were estimated, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the prognostic effect of the combination of the variables.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Patients in the CS group underwent a significantly higher percentage of resection and primary anastomosis. The postoperative morbidity rate was 52.2% in the CS group and 60.5% in the GS group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). The anastomotic dehiscence rate was lower in the CS group (6.2%) than in the GS group (12.1%) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). Postoperative mortality decreased among patients in the CS group (17.9%) with respect to the patients in the GS group (28.3%) (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Being operated on by a CS was predictive in both the univariate and multivariate analyses for postoperative complications and mortality, and it was the only variable with predictive value for anastomotic dehiscence.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Specialization in colorectal surgery has a significant influence on morbidity, mortality, and anastomotic dehiscence after emergency operations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biondo, S., Kreisler, E., Millan, M., Fraccalvieri, D., Golda, T., Frago, R., Miguel, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgery, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.208</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Surgical Specialization on Emergency Colorectal Surgery Outcomes [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/87?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conversion of Emergent Cricothyrotomy to Tracheotomy in Trauma Patients [Review Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/87?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To review the literature to determine the rates of airway stenosis after cricothyrotomy, particularly as they compare with previously documented rates of this complication after tracheotomy, and to examine the complications associated with conversion.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> We conducted a review of the medical literature by the use of PubMed and OVID MEDLINE databases.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> We identified all published series that describe the use of cricothyrotomy, with the inclusion of the subset of patients who require an emergency airway after trauma, from January 1, 1978, to January 1, 2008.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> Only 20 published series of cricothyrotomy were identified: 17 retrospective reports and 3 prospective, observational series.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> Considerable variance in methods and follow-up periods were noted between examinations. Published experiences documented the results of 1134 total patients for whom cricothyrotomy was performed, including 368 trauma patients who underwent emergent cricothyrotomy. The rate of chronic subglottic stenosis among survivors after cricothyrotomy was 2.2% (11/511) overall and 1.1% (4/368) among trauma patients for follow-up periods with a range from 2 to 60 months. Only 1 (0.27%) of the 368 trauma patients in whom an emergent cricothyrotomy was performed required surgical treatment for chronic subglottic stenosis. Although the literature that documents complications of surgical airway conversion is scarce, rates of severe complications of up to 43% were reported.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Cricothyrotomy after trauma is safe for initial airway access among patients who require the establishment of an emergent airway. The prolonged use of a cricothyrotomy tube, however, remains controversial. Although no study to date has demonstrated any benefit of routine conversion to tracheostomy, considerable deficiencies in existing studies highlight the need for further investigations of this practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Talving, P., DuBose, J., Inaba, K., Demetriades, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Airway Obstruction, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Review, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.137</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conversion of Emergent Cricothyrotomy to Tracheotomy in Trauma Patients [Review Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/92?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The UK Proposals for Revalidation of Physicians: Implications for the Recertification of Surgeons [Special Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/92?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The editorial titled "For the Protection of the Public and the Good of the Specialty: Maintenance of Certification" (published in the February 2009 issue of the <I>Archives of Surgery</I>) has prompted us to offer the following article to inform the debate about how assessing surgical care and sorting out the variables to be included in maintenance of certification may develop worldwide. The proposals for revalidation of UK physicians involve the relicensing of all physicians and recertification of all specialists on the specialist register of the General Medical Council. The process will be on a 5-year cycle and is currently under development by the General Medical Council. The Royal Colleges have been charged with creating the standards for recertification, and the responsibility will fall on the Royal Colleges to support their fellows and members as the new regulation is introduced and as it develops. This article outlines developments so far, with particular reference to surgeons.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Youngson, G. G., Knight, P., Hamilton, L., Taylor, I., Tanner, A., Steers, J., Steel, C., de Cossart, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Education, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.227</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The UK Proposals for Revalidation of Physicians: Implications for the Recertification of Surgeons [Special Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>95</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/96?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Pedicle Effect and Direct Coupling: Delayed Thermal Injuries to the Bile Duct After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [Resident's Forum]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/96?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Electrothermal energy, especially in the form of monopolar diathermy, is used widely for dissection during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. While this is largely safe, occasionally there can be unrecognized transfer of energy in the operating area, resulting in electrothermal injury. We report a series of 3 patients who underwent uneventful laparoscopic cholecystectomies but were readmitted 4 to 5 days later with pinhole leaks from the common bile duct as a result of coagulative necrosis caused by unrecognized energy transfer. We suggest that surgeons keep the use of monopolar diathermy to a minimum while dissecting near vital structures.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Humes, D. J., Ahmed, I., Lobo, D. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.236</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Pedicle Effect and Direct Coupling: Delayed Thermal Injuries to the Bile Duct After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [Resident's Forum]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>96</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Resident's Forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/98?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New Board Member Announcement [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/98?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship, Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.237</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New Board Member Announcement [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>98</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Materazzi, G., Berti, P., Conte, M., Faviana, P., Miccoli, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Interventions, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.242-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>99</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Interventions, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.242-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>100</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/101?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/101?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mishra, B., Grandhige, G., Salem, R. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Renal Diseases, Renal Diseases, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Interventions, Other, Diagnosis, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.230-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>101</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>101</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/102?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/102?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Renal Diseases, Renal Diseases, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Interventions, Other, Diagnosis, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.230-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>102</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>102</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Defining an Enterocutaneous Fistula [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maa, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Adult Critical Care, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.231</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Defining an Enterocutaneous Fistula [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Defining an Enterocutaneous Fistula--Reply [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cryer, H. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Adult Critical Care, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.232</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Defining an Enterocutaneous Fistula--Reply [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>103</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Careful Approach to the ABCs of the Management of Portal Venous Gas [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/103-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Naguib, N., Gupta, V., Mekhail, P., Izzidien, A., Masoud, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Diagnosis, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.233</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Careful Approach to the ABCs of the Management of Portal Venous Gas [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/104?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Careful Approach to the ABCs of the Management of Portal Venous Gas--Reply [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/104?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrad, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:24 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Diagnosis, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.234</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Careful Approach to the ABCs of the Management of Portal Venous Gas--Reply [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/104-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[More About the "Heterogeneity" of Merkel Cell Carcinoma [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/104-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chalumeau, C., Ortega-Deballon, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:25 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.239</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[More About the "Heterogeneity" of Merkel Cell Carcinoma [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Designation Does Matter [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pratt, G. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:25 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.254</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Designation Does Matter [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/105-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bariatric Centers of Excellence Programs Do Improve Surgical Outcomes [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/105-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shikora, S. A., Wolfe, B., Schirmer, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:25 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.255</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bariatric Centers of Excellence Programs Do Improve Surgical Outcomes [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>106</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Centers of Excellence [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Latts, L., Singer, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:25 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.256</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Centers of Excellence [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/107?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Centers of Excellence--Reply [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/145/1/107?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Livingston, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:51:25 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.257</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Centers of Excellence--Reply [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>145</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2010-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1104?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1104?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:20 PST</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1104</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surgery as a Teachable Moment: Lost Opportunities to Improve Public Health [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warner, D. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Revascularization, Anesthesia, Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Communication, Patient Education/ Health Literacy, Public Health, Tobacco, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery, Surgery, Other, Cardiovascular Intervention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.205</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surgery as a Teachable Moment: Lost Opportunities to Improve Public Health [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Advancing Age on Abdominal Surgical Outcomes [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To describe the population-level risk of adverse outcomes among older adults undergoing common abdominal surgical procedures.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective, population-based cohort study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Washington State hospital discharge database.</p>
<p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> A total of 101&nbsp;318 adults 65 years or older who underwent common abdominal procedures such as cholecystectomy, colectomy, and hysterectomy from 1987 through 2004.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Ninety-day rates of postsurgical morbidity and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The 90-day cumulative incidence of complications was 17.3%, with a 90-day mortality rate of 5.4%. Advancing age was associated with increasing frequency of complications (65-69 years, 14.6%; 70-74 years, 16.1%; 75-79 years, 18.8%; 80-84 years, 19.9%; 85-89 years, 22.6%; and &ge;90 years, 22.7%; trend test, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and mortality (65-69 years, 2.5%; 70-74 years, 3.8%; 75-79 years, 6.0%; 80-84 years, 8.1%; 85-89 years, 12.6%; and &ge;90 years, 16.7%; trend test, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). After adjusting for demographic, patient, and surgical characteristics as well as hospital volume, the odds of early postoperative death increased considerably with each advance in age category. These associations were found among patients with both cancer and noncancer diagnoses and for both elective and nonelective admissions (trend test, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Among older adults, the risk of complications and early death after commonly performed abdominal procedures is greater than previously reported. These rates should be considered in ongoing quality improvement initiatives and may be helpful when counseling patients regarding abdominal operations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Massarweh, N. N., Legner, V. J., Symons, R. G., McCormick, W. C., Flum, D. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Urology, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.204</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Advancing Age on Abdominal Surgical Outcomes [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Colon Cancer and Low Lymph Node Count: Who Is to Blame? [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To identify the factors that contribute to the disparity in the number of lymph nodes examined for curative colon cancer resections.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Our prospectively accrued cancer registry was analyzed for all colon cancer resections performed in a consecutive 52-month period (January 1, 2003, through April 30, 2007).</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> The study was performed at an 851-bed community hospital. Seventeen surgeons performed colon resections, with the number of resections varying from 1 to 154. Ten pathologists and 3 pathology assistants evaluated the specimens.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 430 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent surgical resection. Only patients with colon cancer were included in the study; patients with rectal cancers, in situ disease only, T4 tumors, and stage IV disease at the time of diagnosis were excluded to ensure a uniform group of patients, all undergoing resection with curative intent.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Age of the patient; the surgeon, pathologist, and pathology technician; stage of disease; and year of surgery were analyzed.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> No statistical difference was found in the number of lymph nodes retrieved based on the surgeon (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.21), pathologist (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.11), or pathology technician (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.26). Age of the patient, primary site of the tumor, stage, and year of surgery were all significantly associated with number of lymph nodes retrieved (<I>P</I> &lt;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The origin of a low lymph node count appears multifactorial. Inadequate lymph node retrieval for colon cancer resections cannot uniformly be attributed to 1 factor, such as the surgeon.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakub, J. W., Russell, G., Tillman, C. L., Lariscy, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.210</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Colon Cancer and Low Lymph Node Count: Who Is to Blame? [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1120</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1121?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital Performance in Caring for Injured Patients: Does the Type of Injury Make a Difference? [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1121?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine whether quality measures based on injury-specific models provide a different perspective about relative hospital rankings compared with a single outcome measure based on all trauma patients.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> We customized the Trauma Mortality Probability Model to create separate injury-specific models for patients who sustained blunt trauma, gunshot wounds, pedestrian trauma, or motor vehicle accident trauma.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> This analysis was conducted using the National Trauma Data Bank. We limited the study to hospitals with 250 or more trauma admissions per year, which coded more than 90% of patients.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> The final data set included 54&nbsp;859 patients admitted to 44 hospitals.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> We performed hospital-level analyses to examine the correlation between hospital risk-adjusted mortality measures based on all trauma patients vs quality measures based on injury-specific measures.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The analysis of the intraclass correlation coefficients suggests fair-to-substantial agreement (0.39-0.68) between the hospital-adjusted odds ratios based on all patients vs odds ratios based on specific injuries.  Analysis demonstrated poor-to-fair agreement between hospital categorical quality measures (high, intermediate, and low quality) when hospital quality was based on outcomes for all trauma patients vs specific subgroups of patients (0.0-0.38). However, none of the hospitals classified as high quality, based on data from all trauma patients, was found to be low quality for any specific injury populations.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> A single composite measure based on all injured patients may not capture all the differences in hospital quality across different populations of injured patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glance, L. G., Mukamel, D. B., Meredith, W., Dick, A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgery, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.218</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital Performance in Caring for Injured Patients: Does the Type of Injury Make a Difference? [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1126</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1121</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1126?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of Hospital Performance: The Need to Complete the "Hat Trick": Comment on "Hospital Performance in Caring for Injured Patients" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1126?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Britt, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.222</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of Hospital Performance: The Need to Complete the "Hat Trick": Comment on "Hospital Performance in Caring for Injured Patients" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1126</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1126</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1127?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Endolaparoscopic Approach vs Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Obstructing Left-Sided Colon Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1127?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To compare self-expanding metal stents with emergency open surgery in the treatment of obstructing left-sided colon cancer.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> A randomized controlled trial.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> An acute care hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Adult patients with an obstructing tumor between the splenic flexure and rectosigmoid junction.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Successful 1-stage operation, cumulative operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, pain score, and postoperative complications.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Forty-eight patients were analyzed. Twenty-four underwent endoluminal stenting followed by laparoscopic resection and 24 underwent emergency open surgery. The 2 groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index, and disease staging. Patients in the endolaparoscopic group had significantly less cumulative blood loss and lower pain, incidence of anastomotic leak, and wound infection. Significantly more patients in the endolaparoscopic group had a successful 1-stage operation performed (16 vs 9, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04). None of the patients in the endolaparoscopic group had a permanent stoma compared with 6 patients in the emergency open surgery group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Self-expanding metal stents serve as a safe and effective bridge to subsequent laparoscopic surgery in patients with obstructing left-sided colon cancer. This endolaparoscopic approach makes a 1-stage operation more feasible, is associated with reduced incidence of stoma creation, and allows patients with malignant large-bowel obstruction to enjoy the full benefit of minimally invasive surgery.</p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00654212">NCT00654212</inter-ref></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheung, H. Y. S., Chung, C. C., Tsang, W. W. C., Wong, J. C. H., Yau, K. K. K., Li, M. K. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Randomized Controlled Trial, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.216</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Endolaparoscopic Approach vs Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Obstructing Left-Sided Colon Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1132</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1127</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1132?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does Every Question Deserve a Randomized Controlled Trial?: Comment on "Endolaparoscopic Approach vs Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Obstructing Left-Sided Colon Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1132?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ludwig, K., Ridolfi, T. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Statistics and Research Methods, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Randomized Controlled Trial, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.217</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does Every Question Deserve a Randomized Controlled Trial?: Comment on "Endolaparoscopic Approach vs Conventional Open Surgery in the Treatment of Obstructing Left-Sided Colon Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1132</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1132</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1133?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can Aviation-Based Team Training Elicit Sustainable Behavioral Change? [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1133?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To quantify effects of aviation-based crew resource management training on patient safety&ndash;related behaviors and perceived personal empowerment.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective study of checklist use, error self-reporting, and a 10-point safety empowerment survey after participation in a crew resource management training intervention.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Seven hundred twenty-two&ndash;bed university hospital; 247-bed affiliated community hospital.</p>
<p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> There were 857 participants, the majority of whom were nurses (50%), followed by ancillary personnel (28%) and physicians (22%).</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Preoperative checklist use over time; number and type of entries on a Web-based incident reporting system; and measurement of degree of empowerment (1-5 scale) on a 10-point survey of safety attitudes and actions given prior to, immediately after, and a minimum of 2 months after training.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Since 2003, 10 courses trained 857 participants in multiple disciplines. Preoperative checklist use rose (75% in 2003, 86% in 2004, 94% in 2005, 98% in 2006, and 100% in 2007). Self-initiated reports increased from 709 per quarter in 2002 to 1481 per quarter in 2008. The percentage of reports related to environment as opposed to actual events increased from 15.9% prior to training to 20.3% subsequently (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01). Perceived self-empowerment, creating a culture of safety, rose by an average of 0.5 point in all 10 realms immediately posttraining (mean [SD] rating, 3.0 [0.07] vs 3.5 [0.05]; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05). This was maintained after a minimum of 2 months. There was a trend toward a hierarchical effect with participants less comfortable confronting incompetence in a physician (mean [SD] rating, 3.1 [0.8]) than in nurses or technicians (mean [SD] rating, 3.4 [0.7] for both) (<I>P</I>>.05).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Crew resource management programs can influence personal behaviors and empowerment. Effects may take years to be ingrained into the culture.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sax, H. C., Browne, P., Mayewski, R. J., Panzer, R. J., Hittner, K. C., Burke, R. L., Coletta, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nursing Care, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgery, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.207</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can Aviation-Based Team Training Elicit Sustainable Behavioral Change? [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1137</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1133</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1138?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1138?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Review of findings from a prospectively acquired institutional database.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Fifty-five consecutive patients operated on by the same surgeon between October 1997 and March 2008.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Blood loss, complication rate, and survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> All operations were accomplished without conversion to open laparotomy. The median operative time was 406 minutes. The median blood loss was 102 mL. A median of 46 lymph nodes were harvested. The TNM stages of the tumor were I in 17 patients (31%), II in 12 (22%), III in 16 (29%), and IV in 10 (18%). A total of 21 complications occurred in 18 patients (33%) with no postoperative mortality. At last follow-up, 44 of the 55 patients were alive without tumor recurrence and 3 with recurrence at a median follow-up of 16 months, whereas 8 had died of recurrence or another cause.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The mortality rate of zero and acceptable morbidity of our series indicate that laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is technically feasible and safe in the hands of experienced surgeons. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to validate oncologic outcome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinohara, T., Kanaya, S., Taniguchi, K., Fujita, T., Yanaga, K., Uyama, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.223</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1142</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1138</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1143?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy the Right Operation?: Comment on "Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1143?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edil, B. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.213</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy the Right Operation?: Comment on "Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1143</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1143</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1144?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Relevance of the TLR4 11367 Polymorphism in Patients With Major Trauma [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1144?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To investigate the clinical relevance of the <I>TLR4</I> 11367 polymorphism in patients with major trauma.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Genetic functional and association study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Daping Hospital and Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing, China.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 132 patients with major trauma were prospectively recruited.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The <I>TLR4</I> 11367 polymorphism was genotyped using single-tube, bidirectional, allele-specific amplification method. Whole peripheral blood samples obtained within 24 hours after admission were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide and then tested for production of tumor necrosis factor  and interleukin 6. Sepsis morbidity rate and multiple organ dysfunction scores were assessed.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The 11367 polymorphism was shown to be strongly associated with less capacity of peripheral leukocytes to produce tumor necrosis factor  and interleukin 6 in response to ex vivo lipopolysaccharide stimulation in patients with trauma at admission. Results from association study indicated that patients with trauma who carry the 11367C allele were less likely to have sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Combined with our previous in vitro functional study, the results suggest that the <I>TLR4</I> 11367 polymorphism might be a good predictor of who is more likely to develop complications such as sepsis or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, depending on genotype.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duan, Z.-x., Gu, W., Zhang, L.-y., Du, D.-y., Hu, P., Huang, J., Liu, Q., Wang, Z.-g., Hao, J., Jiang, J.-x.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Adult Critical Care, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Genetics, Genetics, Other, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.211</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Relevance of the TLR4 11367 Polymorphism in Patients With Major Trauma [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1148</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1144</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1149?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Possibility of Sepsis Prevention With Common Genotype: Comment on "Clinical Relevance of the TLR4 11367 Polymorphism in Patients With Major Trauma" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1149?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neumayer, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Adult Critical Care, Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Genetics, Genetics, Other, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Possibility of Sepsis Prevention With Common Genotype: Comment on "Clinical Relevance of the TLR4 11367 Polymorphism in Patients With Major Trauma" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1149</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1149</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1150?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preoperative Weight Loss Before Bariatric Surgery [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1150?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Preoperative weight loss reduces the frequency of surgical complications in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Review of records of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic gastric bypass.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> A comprehensive, multidisciplinary obesity treatment center at a tertiary referral center that serves central Pennsylvania.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 881 patients undergoing open or laparoscopic gastric bypass from May 31, 2002, through February 24, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> All preoperative patients completed a 6-month multidisciplinary program that encouraged a 10% preoperative weight loss.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Loss of excess body weight (EBW) and total and major complication rates.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of the 881 patients, 592 (67.2%) lost 5% or more EBW and 423 (48.0%) lost more than 10% EBW. Patients referred for open gastric bypass (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;466) were generally older (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), had a higher body mass index (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), and were more often men (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) than those undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;415). Total and major complication rates were higher in patients undergoing open gastric bypass (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001 and <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03, respectively). Univariate analysis revealed that increasing preoperative weight loss is associated with reduced complication frequencies for the entire group for total complications (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=.004) and most likely for major complications (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.06). Controlling for age, sex, baseline body mass index, and type of surgery in a multiple logistic regression model, increased preoperative weight loss was a predictor of reduced complications for any (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=.004) and major (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03) complications.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Preoperative weight loss is associated with fewer complications after gastric bypass surgery.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benotti, P. N., Still, C. D., Wood, G. C., Akmal, Y., King, H., El Arousy, H., Dancea, H., Gerhard, G. S., Petrick, A., Strodel, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Obesity, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.209</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preoperative Weight Loss Before Bariatric Surgery [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1155</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1150</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1155?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Slimming Down for Safer Surgery: Comment on "Preoperative Weight Loss Before Bariatric Surgery" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1155?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turner, P. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.214</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Slimming Down for Safer Surgery: Comment on "Preoperative Weight Loss Before Bariatric Surgery" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1155</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Emergency Colorectal Procedures in Elderly Patients [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To identify rapidly modifiable risk factors that would improve surgical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing emergent colorectal procedures who are at high risk for morbidity and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review. Patients were identified on the basis of <I>Current Procedural Terminology</I> codes and admission through the emergency department. Medical records were reviewed and data were abstracted for comorbidities, procedural details, and in-hospital morbidity and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University tertiary referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Two hundred ninety-two patients 65 years or older undergoing emergency colorectal procedures from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Postoperative morbidity (intensive care unit days, ventilator days, pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular accident) and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The most frequent presenting diagnoses were obstructing or perforated colorectal carcinoma (30%) and perforated diverticulitis (25%). Average age at presentation was 78.1 years, and in-hospital mortality was 15%. One hundred one patients (35%) experienced a total of 195 complications. Pneumonia (25%), persistent or recurrent respiratory failure (15%), and myocardial infarction (12%) were the most frequent complications. Operative time, shock, renal insufficiency, and significant intra-abdominal contamination or frank peritonitis were associated with morbidity. Age, septic shock at presentation, large estimated intraoperative blood loss, delay to operation, and development of a complication were associated with in-hospital mortality.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Emergent colorectal procedures in the elderly are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Minimizing the delay to definitive operative care may improve outcomes. These procedures frequently involve locally advanced colorectal cancer, emphasizing the need for improved colorectal cancer screening.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGillicuddy, E. A., Schuster, K. M., Davis, K. A., Longo, W. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Emergency Medicine, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.203</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Emergency Colorectal Procedures in Elderly Patients [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1162</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1162?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Getting Old Shouldn't Be an Emergency: Comment on "Factors Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Emergency Colorectal Procedures in Elderly Patients" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1162?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fleshman, J. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Emergency Medicine, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Getting Old Shouldn't Be an Emergency: Comment on "Factors Predicting Morbidity and Mortality in Emergency Colorectal Procedures in Elderly Patients" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1162</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1162</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1163?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extended Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct After Pancreaticoduodenectomy [Operative Technique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1163?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Because of better survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), patients may develop complications due to PD and not due to malignancy per se. Exocrine insufficiency may be related to pancreatic duct obstruction or strictures attributable to duct-to-mucosa anastomosis, as in pancreaticojejunostomy. We propose a technique of managing a post-PD duct obstruction.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review from September 2005 to August 2008.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, a referral, high-volume, nonuniversity tertiary care center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> All patients who underwent surgery for anastomotic pancreaticojejunal stricture.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Perioperative outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> All the patients were women and aged 62, 78, and 45 years. Comorbidities were documented in 2 patients. Two patients presented with severe acute abdominal pain and hyperamylasemia while 1 was asymptomatic. Two patients underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was attempted in 1 patient. Operating time was 99 minutes, 158 minutes, and 154 minutes. Estimated blood loss was 250 mL, 400 mL, and 500 mL. A single-layer, side-to-side pancreaticogastrostomy was performed as the drainage procedure in all patients. There was no mortality associated with any of the patients within 30 days. Morbidity was seen only in 1 patient. None of the patients needed a reoperation. The mean length of hospital stay was 9 days. All patients were asymptomatic for pain.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> We propose a durable technique for treating pancreatic ductal strictures post-PD that appears to result in superior postoperative outcome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khithani, A., Curtis, D., Dickerman, R., Jeyarajah, D. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.127</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extended Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct After Pancreaticoduodenectomy [Operative Technique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1166</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Operative Technique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1166?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Year for 2009 [Announcement]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1166?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.212</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Year for 2009 [Announcement]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1166</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1166</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1167?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Clinical Trials of Thyroidectomy With LigaSure vs Conventional Vessel Ligation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [Review Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1167?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the hemostatic effects and safety of thyroidectomy performed using the LigaSure vessel-sealing device (Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado) or the conventional vessel ligation.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Elsevier, SpringerLink, Ovid, and Cochrane Library electronic databases as well as the LigaSure manufacturer's Web site were searched for studies published between 1996 and 2008. No language restrictions were applied.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> Prospective, controlled clinical trials, both randomized and nonrandomized, comparing the hemostatic effects and safety of thyroidectomy using LigaSure and conventional vessel ligation were selected.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> Data regarding operative parameters, duration of the operation, amount of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and any postoperative complications were entered and analyzed using dedicated software from the Cochrane Collaboration.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> Four randomized and 5 nonrandomized trials that met selection criteria reported data from 927 patients, of whom 467 (50.4%) underwent LigaSure and 460 (49.6%) underwent conventional thyroidectomy. Operative duration (weighted mean difference [WMD], &ndash;11.97 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], &ndash;16.42 to &ndash;7.53 minutes) was significantly reduced with LigaSure thyroidectomy (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). When LigaSure was used, operative time reductions of 20.32 minutes (95% CI, &ndash;33.86 to &ndash;6.79 minutes) for total thyroidectomy (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003) and 21.74 minutes (&ndash;38.32 to &ndash;5.16 minutes) for subtotal thyroidectomy (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01) were also confirmed with subgroup analysis. However, differences in the amount of intraoperative blood loss (WMD, &ndash;25.13 mL; 95% CI, &ndash;68.45 to 18.18 mL; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.26), length of hospital stay (WMD, &ndash;0.08 days; 95% CI, &ndash;0.23 to 0.08 days; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.31), and postoperative complication rates (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.04; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.65) were not statistically significant for LigaSure vs conventional thyroidectomy.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The LigaSure technique may provide a safe, effective, and fast alternative to conventional vessel ligation in thyroidectomy and may result in a significant reduction in operative duration. However, it may not confer any advantage over conventional thyroidectomy in terms of the amount of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complication rates.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yao, H. S., Wang, Q., Wang, W. J., Ruan, C. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Blood/ Coagulation, Review, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.201</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Clinical Trials of Thyroidectomy With LigaSure vs Conventional Vessel Ligation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [Review Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1174</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1167</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1174?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sutureless Thyroidectomy--Technological Advance or Toy?: Comment on "Prospective Clinical Trials of Thyroidectomy With LigaSure vs Conventional Vessel Ligation" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1174?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delbridge, L. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.199</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sutureless Thyroidectomy--Technological Advance or Toy?: Comment on "Prospective Clinical Trials of Thyroidectomy With LigaSure vs Conventional Vessel Ligation" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1175</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1174</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1176?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Unique Case of Recurrent Metachronous Volvulus of the Gastrointestinal Tract [Resident's Forum]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1176?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Colonic volvulus is an uncommon disease that predisposes patients to bowel obstruction in both the adult and pediatric population. The international literature offers few reports of synchronous or metachronous volvulus of 2 organs of the gastrointestinal tract. We describe a unique case of a patient who presented with recurrent metachronous volvulus of the sigmoid colon, cecum, and stomach. The patient underwent multiple operations for bowel obstruction, lysis of adhesions, and colon resection. The interesting intraoperative findings were a very long mesentery and peritoneal attachments of the intraabdominal gastrointestinal organs that made the stomach and colon extremely mobile and thus susceptible to volvulus. Prophylactic pexis of the cecum and the stomach during the first operation, in light of the elongated mesentery, may have prevented the subsequent episodes of volvulus.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avgerinos, D. V., Llaguna, O. H., Friedman, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.206</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Unique Case of Recurrent Metachronous Volvulus of the Gastrointestinal Tract [Resident's Forum]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1178</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1176</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Resident's Forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1179?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alessandro Codivilla and the First Pancreatoduodenectomy [Moments in Surgical History]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1179?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schnelldorfer, T., Sarr, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Humanities, History of Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.219</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alessandro Codivilla and the First Pancreatoduodenectomy [Moments in Surgical History]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1184</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Moments in Surgical History</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1185?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1185?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clarke, L., Lambrianides, A., Lisle, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.215-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1185</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1186?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1186?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.215-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1186</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1186</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1187?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1187?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taras, A., Martinez, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.200-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1187</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1187</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1188?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/12/1188?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:21 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.200-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>12</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1188</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1188</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/992?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/992?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:29 PST</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>992</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>992</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Use of Bone-Morphogenetic Proteins for Spine Fusion Surgery Cost-effective? [From JAMA]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cardoso, M. J., Sciubba, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pain, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.185</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Use of Bone-Morphogenetic Proteins for Spine Fusion Surgery Cost-effective? [From JAMA]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>997</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From JAMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/998?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing Patients With Clinically Significant Cardiac and Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease [From the Archives]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/998?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perler, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Revascularization, Neurology, Cerebrovascular Disease, Cardiovascular System, Other, Stroke, Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Cardiovascular Intervention]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.182</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing Patients With Clinically Significant Cardiac and Carotid Artery Occlusive Disease [From the Archives]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>999</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>998</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From the Archives</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1000?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonoperative Management of Patients With a Diagnosis of High-grade Small Bowel Obstruction by Computed Tomography [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1000?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the natural history and treatment of high-grade small bowel obstruction (HGSBO). Small bowel obstruction is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery. Complete and strangulating obstructions are managed operatively while partial obstructions receive a trial of nonoperative therapy. The management and outcome of patients with HGSBO diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) has not been examined.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective medical record review. Outcomes for nonoperative vs operative management were analyzed using Fisher exact and log-rank tests.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary care referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> One thousand five hundred sixty-eight consecutive patients admitted from the emergency department with a diagnosis of small bowel obstruction between 2000 and 2005 by CT criteria.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Recurrence of symptoms and complications.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> One hundred forty-five patients (9%) with HGSBO were identified, with 88% follow-up (median, 332 days; range, 4-2067 days). Sixty-six (46%) were successfully managed nonoperatively while 79 (54%) required an operation. Length of stay and complications were significantly increased in the operative group (4.7 days vs 10.8 days and 3% vs 23%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Nonoperative management was associated with a higher recurrence rate (24% vs 9%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.005) and shorter time to recurrence (39 days vs 105 days; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.005) compared with operative intervention. Computed tomography signs of ischemia, admission laboratory results, and presence of cancer or inflammatory bowel disease were not predictive of an operation.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients with HGSBO by CT can be managed safely with nonoperative therapy; however, they have a significantly higher rate of recurrence requiring readmission or operation within 5 years.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rocha, F. G., Theman, T. A., Matros, E., Ledbetter, S. M., Zinner, M. J., Ferzoco, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Functional Imaging, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, PET/ SPECT Imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.183</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonoperative Management of Patients With a Diagnosis of High-grade Small Bowel Obstruction by Computed Tomography [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1004</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1000</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1005?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Questioning the Small-Bowel Obstruction Paradigm: Comment on "Nonoperative Management of Patients With a Diagnosis of High-grade Small Bowel Obstruction by Computed Tomography" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1005?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pachter, H. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Functional Imaging, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Surgery, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, PET/ SPECT Imaging]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.184</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Questioning the Small-Bowel Obstruction Paradigm: Comment on "Nonoperative Management of Patients With a Diagnosis of High-grade Small Bowel Obstruction by Computed Tomography" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1005</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1005</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1006?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Downwardly Mobile: The Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1006?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Given the pervasive evidence of disparities in screening, hospital admission, treatment, and outcomes due to insurance status, a disparity in outcomes in trauma patients (in-hospital death) among the uninsured may exist, despite preventive regulations (such as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Data were collected from the National Trauma Data Bank from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006 (version 7.0). We used multiple logistic regression to compare mortality rates by insurance status.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> The National Trauma Data Bank contains information from 2.7 million patients admitted for traumatic injury to more than 900 US trauma centers, including demographic data, medical history, injury severity, outcomes, and charges.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Data from patients (age, &ge;18 years; n&nbsp;=&nbsp;687&nbsp;091) with similar age, race, injury severity, sex, and injury mechanism were evaluated for differences in mortality by payer status.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> In-hospital death after blunt or penetrating traumatic injury.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Crude analysis revealed a higher mortality for uninsured patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.42; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Controlling for sex, race, age, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and injury mechanism (adjusted for clustering on hospital), uninsured patients had the highest mortality (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.61-2.02; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Subgroup analysis of young patients unlikely to have comorbidities revealed higher mortality for uninsured patients (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.66-2.15; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), as did subgroup analyses of patients with head injuries (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.42-1.90; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and patients with 1 or more comorbidities (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.30-1.78; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Uninsured Americans have a higher adjusted mortality rate after trauma. Treatment delay, different care (via receipt of fewer diagnostic tests), and decreased health literacy are possible mechanisms.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosen, H., Saleh, F., Lipsitz, S., Rogers, S. O., Gawande, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured, Medical Practice, Other, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Downwardly Mobile: The Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1011</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1006</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1011?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trauma of the Uninsured: Comment on "Downwardly Mobile: The Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1011?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eastman, A. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured, Medical Practice, Other, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Disparities in Health Care Theme Issue, Emergency Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trauma of the Uninsured: Comment on "Downwardly Mobile: The Accidental Cost of Being Uninsured" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1012</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1011</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identification of Specific Quality Improvement Opportunities for the Elderly Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Specific complications occur more frequently in elderly patients undergoing major gastrointestinal (GI) tract operations that may represent opportunities for quality improvement.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective cohort study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> One hundred twenty-one hospitals participating in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Using the ACS-NSQIP participant use file (2005-2006), patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal tract (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;4115), hepatobiliary or pancreatic (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;3364), and colorectal (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;17&nbsp;268) operations at 121 hospitals were examined.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes were assessed using regression modeling adjusting for patient characteristics, comorbidities, and surgical procedures. The elderly were defined as those older than 75 years.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006, a total of 54&nbsp;747 patients who underwent major GI tract operations were identified from the ACS-NSQIP data file. In the elderly, overall perioperative morbidity was 1.2 to 2 times higher and mortality was 2.9 to 6.7 times higher than in younger patients after adjusting for differences in preoperative comorbidities. Irrespective of procedure type, the elderly were significantly more likely to experience cardiac (acute myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest), pulmonary (pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and respiratory failure), and urologic (urinary tract infection and renal failure) complications. However, surgical site infections, postoperative bleeding events, deep venous thromboses, and rates of return to the operating room did not differ significantly by age.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Morbidity and mortality are markedly higher in older patients. Quality measures for the elderly currently address only myocardial infarction, surgical site infection, and deep venous thrombosis. If care for the elderly is to be improved, quality improvement initiatives need to be expanded to include postoperative pulmonary and renal complications.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bentrem, D. J., Cohen, M. E., Hynes, D. M., Ko, C. Y., Bilimoria, K. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identification of Specific Quality Improvement Opportunities for the Elderly Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1020</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1020?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Surgery and Old Age: An Age Old Question: Comment on "Identification of Specific Quality Improvement Opportunities for the Elderly Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1020?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthews, J. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.65</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Surgery and Old Age: An Age Old Question: Comment on "Identification of Specific Quality Improvement Opportunities for the Elderly Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1020</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1020</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1021?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1021?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background&nbsp;</b> Clinical outcomes are increasingly subject to objective assessment and professional accountability. Informed consent relies on accurate estimation of operative risk. Current scoring systems for assessment of operative mortality after colorectal surgery (CRS) almost uniformly report 30-day mortality and may not represent true risk.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective cohort.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> All patients who underwent resections of the colon and/or rectum (as the principal operation) at a single hospital whose data are captured in the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VA-NSQIP) database from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Mortality at 30 days and 90 days.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The VA-NSQIP cohort included 186 patients who underwent CRS, including 148 patients who underwent elective procedures (79.6%) and 38 patients who underwent emergency procedures (20.4%). All but 8 patients were men, with a median age of 67 years (range, 26-92 years). Laparoscopic operations comprised 24.2% and open operations comprised 75.8%. Most (60.8%) were performed for neoplasms. The actual 30-day mortality rates (all, elective, and emergency procedures) were 4.3%, 1.4%, and 15.8%, respectively. These rates closely mirrored the calculated VA-NSQIP risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratio for 30-day mortality (4.8%, 1.8%, and 18.2%, respectively). However, mortality at 90 days increased substantially to 9.1%, 4.1%, and 28.9%, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The 30-day mortality significantly underreports the true risk of death after CRS. The 90-day mortality rate should be included as a standard outcome measure after CRS because it serves as a better estimation of risk for counseling patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Visser, B. C., Keegan, H., Martin, M., Wren, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Colon Cancer, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1027</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1021</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1028?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside of the Operating Room [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1028?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To describe incorrect surgical procedures reported from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Medical Centers from 2001 to mid-2006 and provide proposed solutions for preventing such events.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Descriptive study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.</p>
<p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Veterans of the US Armed Forces.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> The VHA instituted an initial directive, "Ensuring Correct Surgery and Invasive Procedures," in January 2003. The directive was updated in 2004 to include non&ndash;operating room (OR) invasive procedures and incorporated requirements of The Joint Commission Universal Protocol for preventing wrong-site operations.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The categories included 5 incorrect event types (wrong patient, side, site, procedure, or implant), major or minor surgical procedures, location in or out of the OR, therapeutic or diagnostic events, adverse event or close call, inpatient or ambulatory events, specialty department, body segment, and severity and probability of harm.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> We reviewed 342 reported events (212 adverse events and 130 close calls). Of these, 108 adverse events (50.9%) occurred in an OR, and 104 (49.1%) occurred elsewhere. When examining adverse events only, ophthalmology and invasive radiology were the specialties associated with the most reports (45 [21.2%] each), whereas orthopedics was second to ophthalmology for number of reported adverse events occurring in the OR. Pulmonary medicine cases (such as wrong-side thoracentesis) and wrong-site cases (such as wrong spinal level) were associated with the most harm. The most common root cause of events was communication (21.0%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Incorrect ophthalmic and orthopedic surgical procedures appear to be overrepresented among adverse events occurring in ORs. Outside the OR, adverse events by invasive radiology were most frequently reported. Incorrect surgical procedures are not only an OR challenge but also a challenge for events occurring outside of the OR. We support earlier communication based on crew resource management to prevent surgical adverse events.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neily, J., Mills, P. D., Eldridge, N., Dunn, E. J., Samples, C., Turner, J. R., Revere, A., DePalma, R. G., Bagian, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Law and Medicine, Ophthalmology, Ophthalmological Procedures, Ophthalmological Procedures, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Radiography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside of the Operating Room [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1034</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1028</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1034?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient Safety Systems: A Long Way to Go: Comment on "Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside of the Operating Room" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1034?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Velmahos, G. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Law and Medicine, Ophthalmology, Ophthalmological Procedures, Ophthalmological Procedures, Other, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Quality of Care, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Orthopedic Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Radiography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.1034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient Safety Systems: A Long Way to Go: Comment on "Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside of the Operating Room" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1034</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1034</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1035?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Single-Institution Experience With 25 Cases [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1035?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine treatment of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE), a rare vascular tumor with a variable course. Treatment modalities at our institution include liver resection, transplantation, and catheter-based therapies.</p>
<p><b>Design, Patients, and Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review of 25 patients treated for hepatic EHE (1976-2007). We examined treatment modality, overall survival, complications, and clinicopathologic characteristics.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of the 25 patients treated for hepatic EHE, 17 underwent liver transplantation (LT); 4, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE); 2, resection; and 2, TACE followed by LT. Twelve patients (48%) were male. The median age at diagnosis was 38 years (range, 9 months to 72 years). Mean overall survival was 167 (95% confidence interval [CI], 123-212) months, with 172 (124-220) months in the LT group and 83 (54-112) months in the TACE group. The 2 patients in the resection group remain alive after 19 and 71 months. The 2 patients treated with TACE followed by LT died after 13 and 113 months. Extrahepatic disease was identified as a predictor of outcome. Patients with extrahepatic disease treated with TACE fared better than those treated with surgical approaches (mean survival, 83.0 [95% CI, 54.2-111.8] vs 38.8 [23.7-53.8] months; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.12).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Hepatic EHE is a rare tumor that can be treated with surgical or nonsurgical approaches. In our experience, LT is used for patients with advanced local disease, whereas TACE is the primary modality when extrahepatic disease or comorbid conditions prohibiting LT are present. To our knowledge, this is the largest single-institution experience describing the various therapeutic modalities in the treatment of hepatic EHE.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cardinal, J., de Vera, M. E., Marsh, J. W., Steel, J. L., Geller, D. A., Fontes, P., Nalesnik, M., Gamblin, T. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Single-Institution Experience With 25 Cases [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1039</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1035</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1039?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Getting a Handlle on Managing Rare Tumors: Comment on "Treatment of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1039?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hebert, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.124</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Getting a Handlle on Managing Rare Tumors: Comment on "Treatment of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1039</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1039</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1040?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Splenic Salvage After Intraoperative Splenic Injury During Colectomy [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1040?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the optimal surgical management of splenic injury encountered during colectomy.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review from 1992 to 2007.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, a tertiary care center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A cohort of patients who sustained splenic injury during colectomy from 1992 to 2007.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Overall 30-day major morbidity and mortality and overall 5-year survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Of 13&nbsp;897 colectomies, we identified 59 splenic injuries (0.42%). Of these, 33 (56%) were in men; there was a median age of 68 years (range, 30-93 years) and a median body mass index of 25.5 (range, 15-54). Thirty-seven injuries (63%) occurred during elective surgery, 6 (10%) occurred without splenic flexure mobilization, and 5 (8.4%) occurred during minimally invasive surgery. Injury was successfully managed by primary repair in 10 (17%), splenorrhaphy in 4 (7%), and splenectomy in 45 cases (76%). Four injuries (7%) were unrecognized and resulted in reoperation and splenectomy. Multiple attempts at splenic salvage were performed in 30 (51%); of these, 21 (70%) required splenectomy. More than 2 attempts at salvage was associated with splenectomy (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03). The 30-day major morbidity and mortality rates were 34% and 17%, respectively. Sepsis was the most common complication, with no confirmed episodes of postsplenectomy sepsis. Median survival after splenic injury was 7.25 years. There was no significant association between the surgical management of splenic injuries and short- or long-term outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Splenic injury is an infrequent but morbid complication. Splenic salvage is frequently unsuccessful; our data suggest that surgeons should not be reluctant to perform splenectomy when initial repair attempts fail.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holubar, S. D., Wang, J. K., Wolff, B. G., Nagorney, D. M., Dozois, E. J., Cima, R. R., O'Byrne, M. M., Qin, R., Larson, D. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.188</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Splenic Salvage After Intraoperative Splenic Injury During Colectomy [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1045</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1040</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1047?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Lessons Learned From 200 "Components Separation" Procedures [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1047?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To determine the efficacy and describe the evolution of the "components separation" technique for abdominal wall repair in 200 consecutive patients.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective medical record review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent ventral hernia repair using the components separation technique.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> Biological and permanent meshes were used in select patients to augment the repair of the midline fascial closure but were not used as "bridging" materials.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Hernia recurrence rates and major and minor complication rates for the overall series and for the different techniques.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Primary components separation (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;158) yielded a 22.8% recurrence rate. Closure of the midline tissues with augmentation of the repair using an acellular cadaveric dermis underlay (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;18) had a 33.3% recurrence rate requiring a second operation, whereas intra-abdominal soft polypropylene mesh (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;18) had 0% recurrence (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04). Elevated body mass index was a significant risk factor predicting hernia recurrence (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.003). Contamination (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04) and enterocutaneous fistula (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02) at the time of surgery were associated with increased major complications, whereas body mass index (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01) and diabetes mellitus (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04) were associated with increased minor complications.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Large complex hernias can be reliably repaired using the components separation technique despite the presence of open wounds, the need for bowel surgery, and numerous comorbidities. The long-term strength of the hernia repair is not augmented by acellular cadaveric dermis but seems to be improved with soft polypropylene mesh.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ko, J. H., Wang, E. C., Salvay, D. M., Paul, B. C., Dumanian, G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.192</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Lessons Learned From 200 "Components Separation" Procedures [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1055</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1047</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1056?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of Stitch Length on Wound Complications After Closure of Midline Incisions: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1056?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> In midline incisions closed with a single-layer running suture, the rate of wound complications is lower when a suture length to wound length ratio of at least 4 is accomplished with a short stitch length rather than with a long one.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective randomized controlled trial.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Surgical department.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Patients operated on through a midline incision.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Wound closure with a short stitch length (ie, placing stitches &lt;10 mm from the wound edge) or a long stitch length.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, and incisional hernia.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In all, 737 patients were randomized: 381 were allocated to a long stitch length and 356, to a short stitch length. Wound dehiscence occurred in 1 patient whose wound was closed with a long stitch length. Surgical site infection occurred in 35 of 343 patients (10.2%) in the long stitch group and in 17 of 326 (5.2%) in the short stitch group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02). Incisional hernia was present in 49 of 272 patients (18.0%) in the long stitch group and in 14 of 250 (5.6%) in the short stitch group (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). In multivariate analysis, a long stitch length was an independent risk factor for both surgical site infection and incisional hernia.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> In midline incisions closed with a running suture and having a suture length to wound length ratio of at least 4, current recommendations of placing stitches at least 10 mm from the wound edge should be changed to avoid patient suffering and costly wound complications. </p>
<p><b>Trial Registration&nbsp;</b> clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: <inter-ref locator-type="url" locator="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00508053">NCT00508053</inter-ref></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Millbourn, D., Cengiz, Y., Israelsson, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.189</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of Stitch Length on Wound Complications After Closure of Midline Incisions: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1059</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1056</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1060?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcomes From 3144 Adrenalectomies in the United States: Which Matters More, Surgeon Volume or Specialty? [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1060?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To assess the effect of surgeon volume and specialty on clinical and economic outcomes after adrenalectomy.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Population-based retrospective cohort analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample.</p>
<p><b>Participants&nbsp;</b> Adults (&ge;18 years) undergoing adrenalectomy in the United States (1999-2005). Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, surgeon specialty (general vs urologist), surgeon adrenalectomy volume, and hospital factors were assessed.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The <sup>2</sup> test, analysis of variance, and multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to assess in-hospital complications, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), and total inpatient hospital costs.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A total of 3144 adrenalectomies were included. Mean patient age was 53.7 years; 58.8% were women and 77.4% white. A higher proportion of general surgeons were high-volume surgeons compared with urologists (34.1% vs 18.2%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Low-volume surgeons had more complications (18.2% vs 11.3%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and their patients had longer LOS (5.5 vs 3.9 days, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) than did high-volume surgeons; urologists had more complications (18.4% vs 15.2%, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.03) and higher costs ($13&nbsp;168 vs $11&nbsp;732, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02) than did general surgeons. After adjustment for patient and provider characteristics in multivariate analyses, surgeon volume, but not specialty, was an independent predictor of complications (odds ratio&nbsp;=&nbsp;1.5, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.002) and LOS (1.0-day difference, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Hospital volume was associated only with LOS (0.8-day difference, <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.007). Surgeon volume, specialty, and hospital volume were not predictors of costs.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> To optimize outcomes, patients with adrenal disease should be referred to surgeons based on adrenal volume and laparoscopic expertise irrespective of specialty practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, H. S., Roman, S. A., Sosa, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.191</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcomes From 3144 Adrenalectomies in the United States: Which Matters More, Surgeon Volume or Specialty? [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1067</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1060</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1068?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors That Determine Satisfaction With Surgical Treatment of Low-Income Women With Breast Cancer [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1068?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To analyze the relationship between patient satisfaction with surgical treatment and 4 consultation skills and processes of the surgeons (time spent, listens carefully, explains concepts in a way the patient can understand, and shows respect for what the patient has to say), controlling for a range of patient, surgeon, and treatment characteristics.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Cross-sectional survey.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> The Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program for the state of California.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A statewide sample of 789 low-income women who received treatment for breast cancer from February 1, 2003, through September 31, 2005.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Satisfaction with surgical treatment.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Three of every 4 women reported being extremely satisfied with the treatment they received from their surgeon. African American women and those with arm swelling were less likely to be satisfied, whereas those reporting that the surgeon always spent enough time and explained concepts in a way they could understand were more likely to report greater satisfaction.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Our findings highlight the importance of 2 relatively simple behaviors that surgeons can easily implement to increase patient satisfaction, which can be of potential benefit in the litigious world of today.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thind, A., Diamant, A., Liu, Y., Maly, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Oncology, Breast Cancer, Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care, Patient-Physician Communication, Patient Education/ Health Literacy, Patient-Physician Relationship, Other, Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgical Oncology, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.190</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors That Determine Satisfaction With Surgical Treatment of Low-Income Women With Breast Cancer [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1073</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1068</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1074?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measures to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Review [Review Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1074?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To review the current evidence on the efficacy of various interventions directed toward prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> A MEDLINE database search from January 1, 1990, to August 31, 2008, was performed to identify relevant articles using the keywords <I>pancreatoduodenectomy</I>, <I>pancreaticojejunostomy</I>, <I>pancreaticogastrostomy</I>, <I>pancreatic anastomotic leakage</I>, and <I>pancreatic fistula</I>. Additional articles were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> Case reports were excluded from this study.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> Of the identified studies, only those published in English describing meta-analyses or randomized controlled trials were considered first. In those aspects with limited or no randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized comparative studies and case series were included also.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> The prophylactic use of perioperative somatostatin and its analogues to prevent pancreas-related complications after pancreatic surgery remains controversial and does not result in a reduction of operative mortality. There is no clear evidence for or against a particular type of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis. Pancreaticoenterostomy cannot be replaced by pancreatic ductal obliteration. Pancreaticogastrostomy is equivalent to pancreaticojejunostomy in perioperative morbidity and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> More large-scale comparative studies and randomized controlled trials are required to determine the optimum pharmacologic interventions and technique of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lai, E. C. H., Lau, S. H. Y., Lau, W. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Review, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measures to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Review [Review Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1080</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1074</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1081?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Benign Fibroepithelial Polyp Arising in the Bronchus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature [Resident's Forum]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1081?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Benign endobronchial polyps are rare findings that present a diagnostic dilemma not only for the clinician but also for the pathologist. We describe a man with repeated visits to emergency departments for coughing spells who ultimately underwent bronchoscopy and biopsy. The biopsy specimen was initially diagnosed as a leiomyoma, but the final pathologic diagnosis of the gross specimen was a benign fibroepithelial polyp. We present the clinical history of this patient along with a brief review of the published literature regarding this rare clinical entity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amin, P. B., Baciewicz, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Thoracic Surgery, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Benign Fibroepithelial Polyp Arising in the Bronchus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature [Resident's Forum]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1083</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1081</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Resident's Forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1085?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1085?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sun, B., Moazzez, A., Mason, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.186-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1085</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1085</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1086?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1086?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.186-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1086</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1086</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1087?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1087?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ratnapala, D. N., Lisle, D., Munn, E., Lambrianides, A. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.187-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1087</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1087</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1088?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1088?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.187-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1088</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1088</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1089?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Life and Times of Allen Oldfather Whipple: The Missionary and the Surgeon [Book Reviews]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/11/1089?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfgang, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:51:30 PST</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgery, Other, Humanities, History of Medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Life and Times of Allen Oldfather Whipple: The Missionary and the Surgeon [Book Reviews]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1089</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1089</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/888?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/888?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[About This Journal [About This Journal]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>888</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>888</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/892?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of a Saline Bag as a Shoulder Roll During Surgery Not Recommended [Commentary]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/892?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pearlman, R. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Burns]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of a Saline Bag as a Shoulder Roll During Surgery Not Recommended [Commentary]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>892</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>892</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/893?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quantifying Access to Surgical Care [From JAMA]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/893?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Segev, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Medical Practice, Medical Practice, Other, Renal Diseases, Renal Diseases, Other, Surgery, Surgery, Other, Transplantation, Kidney Transplantation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.173</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quantifying Access to Surgical Care [From JAMA]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>893</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>893</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From JAMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/894?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Use of Seamguard to Prevent Pancreatic Leak Following Distal Pancreatectomy [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/894?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To investigate the use of Seamguard, a bioabsorbable staple line&ndash;reinforcement product, to prevent pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy.</p>
<p><b>Design, Setting, and Participants&nbsp;</b> A retrospective study examined 85 consecutive patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution from September 5, 1997, to September 30, 2007.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Pancreatic fistula and overall mortality and morbidity.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In February 2004, the use of Seamguard in distal pancreas resections was introduced at our institution. Indications for resection included trauma (11 patients), neoplasms (62 patients), and chronic pancreatitis (12 patients). Pancreatic leak was defined as drain output of 25 mL/d or more 7 days postoperatively with a drain amylase level of 1000 U/L or more. Pancreatic leak occurred in 10 of 38 patients (26%) undergoing conventional resection with suture ligation of the pancreatic duct or nonreinforced stapled resection vs 2 of 47 patients (4%) undergoing staple resection using Seamguard reinforcement. Multivariate analysis showed that use of Seamguard with the stapler independently decreased the risk for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.43; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The use of Seamguard is quickly becoming a common adjunct in distal pancreas resections. Our study shows a lower incidence of pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy with the use of this staple line&ndash;reinforcing product.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yamamoto, M., Hayashi, M. S., Nguyen, N. T., Nguyen, T. D., McCloud, S., Imagawa, D. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.39</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Use of Seamguard to Prevent Pancreatic Leak Following Distal Pancreatectomy [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>899</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>894</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/899?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[To Mesh or Not to Mesh, That Is the Question: Comment on "Use of Seamguard to Prevent Pancreatic Leak Following Distal Pancreatectomy" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/899?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hawkins, W. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Physiology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.34</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[To Mesh or Not to Mesh, That Is the Question: Comment on "Use of Seamguard to Prevent Pancreatic Leak Following Distal Pancreatectomy" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>899</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>899</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/900?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ischemic Colitis After Endovascular Aortoiliac Aneurysm Repair: A 10-Year Retrospective Study [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/900?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine the incidence, cause, and outcomes of ischemic colitis after endovascular stent graft repair of aortoiliac aneurysms (EVAR).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Medical record review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University teaching hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Eight hundred nine patients treated during 10 years were included in the study. Preoperative data regarding the size of the aneurysm, hypogastric coil embolization, and inferior mesenteric artery patency were evaluated by means of computed tomographic scans and aortograms. Ischemic colitis was diagnosed by lower endoscopy or pathology reports.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Ischemic colitis after EVAR.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Eleven patients (1.4%) developed ischemic colitis. Seven patients' episode occurred less than 30 days from repair (early), whereas 4 occurred 30 days or more from repair (late). Ten of 11 patients had preoperative inferior mesenteric artery occlusion. Microembolization was seen histologically in 2 patients in the early group, both of whom died. A significant increase in ischemic colitis was seen in patients undergoing preoperative unilateral hypogastric coil embolization (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.02). Three of the patients with late ischemic colitis had comorbidities other than the EVAR to explain the ischemia.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The incidence of ischemic colitis is decreased in patients undergoing EVAR vs open repair. The cause of the ischemia is multifactorial and seems to differ between patients in the early and late groups. Microembolization tends to produce severe ischemic colitis and is usually fatal. There should be a low threshold for performing endoscopy in any patient thought to have ischemic colitis after EVAR.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, A., Marotta, M., Scordi-Bello, I., Tammaro, Y., Marin, M., Divino, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.70</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ischemic Colitis After Endovascular Aortoiliac Aneurysm Repair: A 10-Year Retrospective Study [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>903</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>900</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/903?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA["Hardening of the Arteries" Is a Systemic Disease: Comment on "Ischemic Colitis After Endovascular Aortoiliac Aneurysm Repair" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/903?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bredenberg, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular System, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.35</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA["Hardening of the Arteries" Is a Systemic Disease: Comment on "Ischemic Colitis After Endovascular Aortoiliac Aneurysm Repair" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>903</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>903</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/906?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the Prognosis After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Western Dual-Center Experience [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/906?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> The role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in determining the prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis is controversial.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective study based on multicenter prospectively updated databases.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Two tertiary referral centers specializing in hepatobiliary surgery.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Two hundred four consecutive patients with cirrhosis undergoing hepatectomy for single nodules of HCC of 5 cm or smaller from January 1, 1997, through September 30, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> Patients were divided into the following groups according to their preoperative viral status: HBV positive and hepatitis C virus (HCV) negative (group 1); HBV negative and HCV positive (group 2); HBV negative and HCV negative (group 3); and HBV positive and HCV positive (group 4).</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> A multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) among demographic, clinical, pathological, and surgical variables.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The 2 centers had comparable RFS and early and late recurrence rates. Five-year RFS was significantly higher in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 (38%, 34%, and 9%, respectively; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.007 and <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.05). Factors independently associated with RFS were HBV infection (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.009; odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.78) and poor tumor differentiation (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001; odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.96). The concomitance of 0, 1, or 2 risk factors led to 5-year RFS rates of 49%, 20%, and 8%, respectively (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Infection with HBV is a strong predictive factor for lower RFS after hepatectomy for a single nodule of HCC of 5 cm or smaller in patients with cirrhosis, providing a further basis for adjuvant antiviral treatment. Patients who are seropositive for HBV with poorly differentiated HCC should also be considered to be at a high risk of recurrence and possibly included in a policy of salvage liver transplantation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cescon, M., Cucchetti, A., Grazi, G. L., Ferrero, A., Vigano, L., Ercolani, G., Ravaioli, M., Zanello, M., Andreone, P., Capussotti, L., Pinna, A. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.99</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the Prognosis After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Western Dual-Center Experience [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>913</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>906</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/913?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HBV and HCC: Comment on "Role of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the Prognosis After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinomain Patients With Cirrhosis: A Western Dual-Center Experience" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/913?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Levi, D., Tzakis, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Hepatobiliary Surgery, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.98</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HBV and HCC: Comment on "Role of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the Prognosis After Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinomain Patients With Cirrhosis: A Western Dual-Center Experience" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>913</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>913</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/914?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of Long-term Mortality After Bariatric Surgery Performed in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/914?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> The purpose of this study was to examine patient factors associated with mortality among veterans who undergo bariatric surgery.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective study that uses data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Group Health Center for Health Studies, the VA North Texas Health Care System, the Denver VA Medical Center, and the Durham VA Medical Center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> We identified 856 veterans who had undergone bariatric surgery in 1 of 12 VA bariatric centers from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The risk of death was estimated via Cox proportional hazards.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The 856 veterans had a mean body mass index (BMI) of 48.7, a mean age of 54 years, and a mean DCG score of 0.76; 73.0% were men, 83.9% were white, and 7.0% had an ASA class equal to 4. Fifty-four veterans (6.3%) had died by the end of 2006. In our Cox models, patients with a BMI greater than 50 (superobesity; hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.04) or a DCG score greater than or equal to 2 (HR, 3.4; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) had an increased risk of death.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Superobese veterans and those with a greater burden of chronic disease had a greater risk of death after bariatric surgery from 2000 through 2006.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arterburn, D., Livingston, E. H., Schifftner, T., Kahwati, L. C., Henderson, W. G., Maciejewski, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.134</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of Long-term Mortality After Bariatric Surgery Performed in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>920</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>914</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/920?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Possible Lack of Survival Advantage for One Group: Comment on "Predictors of Long-term Mortality After Bariatric Surgery Performed in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/920?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deveney, C. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Public Health, Obesity, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Bariatric Surgery, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.135</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Possible Lack of Survival Advantage for One Group: Comment on "Predictors of Long-term Mortality After Bariatric Surgery Performed in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>920</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>920</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/921?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Late Results of the Surgical Treatment of 125 Patients With Short-Segment Barrett Esophagus [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/921?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> The results of surgical treatment of patients with long-segment Barrett esophagus (BE) have been extensively reported. However, few publications refer to the results of surgery 5 years after the fact among patients with short-segment BE. This study aimed to determine the late results of 3 surgical procedures in patients with short-segment BE by subjective and objective measurements.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective, nonrandomized study starting on March 1, 1987, and ending on December 31, 2005.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> A prospective, descriptive study of a group of patients.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of<b></b> 125 patients with short-segment BE underwent 3 operations in different periods: duodenal switch plus highly selective vagotomy and antireflux technique in 31 patients, vagotomy plus partial gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y loop with antireflux surgery in 58 patients, and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in 36 patients.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Late subjective and objective outcomes of the 3 different surgical procedures.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> No operative mortality and only 2 postoperative complications (1.6%) occurred. The regression from intestinal metaplasia to cardiac or oxyntocardiac mucosa occurred in 60.8% to 65.4% of the patients, at a mean time of 39 to 56 months after surgery. Visick grading showed Visick grade I or II in 86.3% to 100.0% of the patients. No progression to low- or high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma occurred.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> On the basis of these results, laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication seems to be the surgical option for patients with short-segment BE because it is less invasive, has fewer side effects, and produces good results in the long-term follow-up.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Csendes, A., Braghetto, I., Burdiles, P., Smok, G., Henriquez, A., Burgos, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.83</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Late Results of the Surgical Treatment of 125 Patients With Short-Segment Barrett Esophagus [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>927</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>921</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/927?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Questions Regarding Surgery to Correct Short-Segment BE: Comment on "Late Results of the Surgical Treatment of 125 Patients With Short-Segment Barrett Esophagus" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/927?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeMeester, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.84</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Questions Regarding Surgery to Correct Short-Segment BE: Comment on "Late Results of the Surgical Treatment of 125 Patients With Short-Segment Barrett Esophagus" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>927</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>927</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/928?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis in Trauma: Are They Related? [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/928?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in trauma are related.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review of medical records.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic level I trauma center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Trauma patients who underwent computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with computed tomographic venography (CTV) of the pelvic and proximal lower extremity veins over a 3-year period (January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006) were reviewed. Data on demographics, injury type and severity, imaging findings, hospital length of stay, and mortality were collected.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Pulmonary embolism and DVT.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Among 247 trauma patients undergoing CTPA/CTV, PE was diagnosed in 46 (19%) and DVT in 18 (7%). Eighteen PEs were central (main or lobar pulmonary arteries), and 28 PEs were peripheral (segmental or subsegmental branches). Pulmonary embolism occurred within the first week of injury in two-thirds of patients. Seven patients with PE (4 femoral, 2 popliteal, and 1 iliac) had DVT. Pulmonary embolism was central in 5 patients and peripheral in 2 patients. No significant differences were noted in any of the examined variables between patients with PE having DVT and those not having DVT.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Few patients with PE have DVT of the pelvic or proximal lower extremity veins. Pulmonary embolism may not originate from these veins, as commonly believed, but instead may occur de novo in the lungs. These findings have implications for thromboprophylaxis and, particularly, the value of vena cava filters.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Velmahos, G. C., Spaniolas, K., Tabbara, M., Abujudeh, H. H., de Moya, M., Gervasini, A., Alam, H. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:01 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Cardiovascular System, Pulmonary Diseases, Pulmonary Diseases, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Vascular Surgery, Diagnosis, Angiology, Ultrasonography, Radiologic Imaging, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.97</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis in Trauma: Are They Related? [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>932</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>928</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/932?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Searching for the Source of Venous Clots: An Unsolved Old Problem: Comment on "Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis in Trauma: Are They Related?" [Invited Critique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/932?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coimbra, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Venous Thromboembolism, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Cardiovascular System, Pulmonary Diseases, Pulmonary Diseases, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Vascular Surgery, Diagnosis, Angiology, Ultrasonography, Radiologic Imaging, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.144.10.932</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Searching for the Source of Venous Clots: An Unsolved Old Problem: Comment on "Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Venous Thrombosis in Trauma: Are They Related?" [Invited Critique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>932</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>932</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Invited Critique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/933?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Continuous Postoperative Blood Glucose Monitoring and Control by Artificial Pancreas in Patients Having Pancreatic Resection: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/933?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate a closed-loop system providing continuous monitoring and strict control of perioperative blood glucose following pancreatic resection.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective, randomized clinical trial.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Thirty patients who had pancreatic resection for pancreatic neoplasm.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> Patients were prospectively randomized. Perioperative blood glucose levels were continuously monitored using an artificial endocrine pancreas (STG-22). Glucose levels were controlled using either the sliding scale method (sliding scale group, n&nbsp;=&nbsp;13) or the artificial pancreas (artificial pancreas group, n&nbsp;=&nbsp;17).</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Incidence of severe hypoglycemia (&lt;40 mg/dL) during the intensive care period following pancreatic resection in patients monitored with the artificial pancreas. The secondary outcome measure was the total amount of insulin required for glycemic control in the first 18 hours after pancreatic resection in each patient group.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> In the sliding scale group, postoperative blood glucose levels rose initially before reaching a plateau of approximately 200 mg/dL between 4 and 6 hours after pancreatectomy. The levels remained high for 18 hours postoperatively. In the artificial pancreas group, blood glucose levels reduced steadily, reaching the target zone (80-110 mg/dL) by 6 hours after surgery. The total insulin dose administered per patient during the first postoperative 18 hours was significantly higher in the artificial pancreas group (mean [SD], 107&nbsp;[109] IU) than the sliding scale group (8&nbsp;[6] IU; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.01). Neither group showed hypoglycemia.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Perioperative use of an artificial endocrine pancreas to control pancreatogenic diabetes after pancreatic resection is an easy and effective way to maintain near-normal blood glucose levels. The artificial pancreas shows promise for use as insulin treatment for patients with pancreatogenic diabetes after pancreatic resection.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Okabayashi, T., Nishimori, I., Yamashita, K., Sugimoto, T., Maeda, H., Yatabe, T., Kohsaki, T., Kobayashi, M., Hanazaki, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine, Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Randomized Controlled Trial, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.176</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Continuous Postoperative Blood Glucose Monitoring and Control by Artificial Pancreas in Patients Having Pancreatic Resection: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>937</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>933</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/938?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Statin Use and the Risk of Surgical Site Infections in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/938?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine whether preoperative statin use is associated with a reduced risk of surgical site infections.</p>
<p><b>Design, Setting, and Patients&nbsp;</b> Population-based retrospective cohort study of all elderly patients undergoing elective surgery in Ontario from April 1, 1992, through March 31, 2006. Preoperative statin use was identified using provincewide pharmacy records. Procedure and patient characteristics were derived from hospital and physician claims databases within Canada's single-payer universal health care system.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> The 30-day risk of surgical site infection was derived from the initial admission, outpatient consultations, and hospital readmissions.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The cohort included 469&nbsp;349 distinct elderly patients undergoing elective surgery, of whom 68&nbsp;387 (14.6%) were statin users. The primary analysis included 53&nbsp;565 statin users matched to 53&nbsp;565 statin nonusers undergoing the same procedure in the same hospital by the same surgeon. Unadjusted analysis revealed a slight increase in the risk of surgical site infection among statin users compared with nonusers (8.9% vs 8.7%; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001), which disappeared after adjustment for demographics, health care utilization variables, comorbidities, and concurrent medication therapy (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.04; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.85). A similar lack of association was seen when matching was extended to include propensity scores (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.05; <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.82). The lack of association persisted across pharmacologic, patient, and procedure subgroups.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Statin use is not associated with an altered risk of surgical site infection. Prevention efforts should be directed toward other evidence-based strategies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daneman, N., Thiruchelvam, D., Redelmeier, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.167</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Statin Use and the Risk of Surgical Site Infections in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>945</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>938</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/946?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management and Treatment of Iliopsoas Abscess [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/946?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Hypothesis&nbsp;</b> Even with improved diagnostic modalities, the optimum management strategy for iliopsoas abscess (IPA) is not uniform, and a better understanding of treatment options is needed.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective case series.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Academic center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Sixty-one consecutive patients diagnosed as having IPA at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, from August 1, 2000, to December 30, 2007.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Development and cause of IPA, the need for additional interventions, morbidity, and mortality.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The mean age of the patients was 53 years. Most patients were initially seen with pain (95% [58 of 61]), gastrointestinal tract complaints (43% [26 of 61]), and lower extremity pain (30% [18 of 61]). Primary and secondary abscesses occurred in 11% (7 of 61) and 89% (54 of 61), respectively. The most frequent underlying cause of secondary abscesses was inflammatory bowel disease. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were prescribed in all patients. Computed tomography was the most common diagnostic modality used. Abscesses were larger than 6 cm in 39% of patients (24 of 61), bilateral in 13% (8 of 61), and multiple in 25% (15 of 61). Nine patients were treated using antibiotics alone, with a success rate of 78% (7 of 9). Forty-eight patients initially underwent percutaneous drainage, which was successful in 40% (19 of 48). Among those with unresolved IPAs, 71% of patients ultimately required surgery, and the IPAs were typically associated with underlying gastrointestinal tract causes. Seven percent (4 of 61) of patients directly underwent exploratory surgery and drainage, and all of these interventions were successful. The overall mortality was 5% (3 of 61).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Iliopsoas abscess remains a therapeutic challenge. Gastrointestinal tract disease is the most common cause, with computed tomography as the diagnostic modality of choice. Percutaneous drainage remains the initial treatment modality but is rarely the sole therapy required. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are likely to require ultimate operative management.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tabrizian, P., Nguyen, S. Q., Greenstein, A., Rajhbeharrysingh, U., Divino, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Surgical Physiology, Surgical Infections, Diagnosis, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management and Treatment of Iliopsoas Abscess [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>949</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>946</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/950?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Establishing Standards of Quality for Elderly Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection [Original Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/950?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate pancreatic surgery as a model for high-acuity surgery in elderly patients for immediate and long-term outcomes, predictors of adverse outcomes, and hospital costs.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective case series.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University tertiary care referral center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Four hundred twelve consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resection from October 1, 2001, through March 31, 2008, for benign and malignant periampullary conditions.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Clinical outcomes were compared for elderly (&ge;75 years) and nonelderly patient cohorts. Quality assessment analyses were performed to show the differential impact of complications and resource utilization between the groups.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The elderly cohort constituted one-fifth of all patients. Benchmark standards of quality were achieved in this group, including low operative mortality (1%). Despite higher patient acuity, clinical outcomes were comparable to those of nonelderly patients at a marginal cost increase (median, $2202 per case). Cost modeling analysis showed further that minor and moderate complications were more frequent but no more debilitating for elderly patients. Major complications, however, were far more threatening to older patients. In these cases, duration of hospital stay doubled, and invasive interventions were more commonly deployed.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Quality standards for pancreatic resection in the elderly can&mdash;and should&mdash;mirror those for younger patients. Age-related care, including geriatric consultation, supplemental enteral nutrition, and early rehabilitation placement planning, can be designed to mitigate the impact of complications in the elderly and guarantee quality.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pratt, W. B., Gangavati, A., Agarwal, K., Schreiber, R., Lipsitz, L. A., Callery, M. P., Vollmer, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Aging/ Geriatrics, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endocrine Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Gastroenterology, Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.107</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Establishing Standards of Quality for Elderly Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Resection [Original Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>956</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>950</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/957?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transumbilical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Novel Technique [Operative Technique]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/957?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To describe a novel technique for performing laparoscopic cholecystectomies using no proprietary or specially designed equipment, while still minimizing the incision and leaving a nearly invisible scar.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Community teaching hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Twelve patients having uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Number and appearance of postoperative scars.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Twelve attempts to perform the procedure with our new technique were completed successfully. None of the patients required conversion to the standard technique, which requires additional ports. All of the patients were pleased with their results. No identifiable mark was visible in the right upper quadrant of any of the patients; at the 2-week follow-up, the umbilical incisions were nearly invisible, even to the patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> This novel technique can be performed safely and effectively while minimizing the number and extent of incisions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunning, K., Kohli, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.165</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transumbilical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Novel Technique [Operative Technique]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>960</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>957</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Operative Technique</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/961?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group Recommendations [Review Article]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/961?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To describe a consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and to provide consensus recommendations for each item of an evidence-based protocol for optimal perioperative care.</p>
<p><b>Data Sources&nbsp;</b> For every item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature has been examined.</p>
<p><b>Study Selection&nbsp;</b> Particular attention was paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews.</p>
<p><b>Data Extraction&nbsp;</b> A consensus recommendation for each protocol item was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group.</p>
<p><b>Data Synthesis&nbsp;</b> For most protocol items, recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of such trials.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group presents a comprehensive evidence-based consensus review of perioperative care for colorectal surgery. It is based on the evidence available for each element of the multimodal perioperative care pathway.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lassen, K., Soop, M., Nygren, J., Cox, P. B. W., Hendry, P. O., Spies, C., von Meyenfeldt, M. F., Fearon, K. C. H., Revhaug, A., Norderval, S., Ljungqvist, O., Lobo, D. N., Dejong, C. H. C., for the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Medicine, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Review, Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.170</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Consensus Review of Optimal Perioperative Care in Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group Recommendations [Review Article]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>969</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>961</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/970?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Simultaneous Bicavitary Hyperthermic Chemoperfusion in the Management of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei With Synchronous Pleural Extension [Resident's Forum]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/970?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Extra-abdominal spread of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare event, but extension of the tumor beyond the abdomen into the pleural cavity has been reported. We report a case with synchronous pleural manifestation of PMP confirmed during abdominal cytoreductive surgery that was managed by simultaneous bicavitary hyperthermic chemoperfusion. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of bicavitary hyperthermic chemoperfusion for PMP. During the abdominal cytoreductive surgery in a patient with known history of PMP, extensive disease under the right hemidiaphragm was noted, requiring partial diaphragmatic resection. Once the pleural space was entered, separate mucinous deposits on the pleural surface of the diaphragm and lung surface were observed. The involved portion of the right hemidiaphragm and lung were resected. The diaphragmatic defect was left open during the hyperthermic chemoperfusion to treat both the pleural and peritoneal surfaces. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Simultaneous bicavitary hyperthermic chemoperfusion is a potential therapeutic option for patients with pleural extension identified during cytoreductive surgery.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Senthil, M., Harrison, L. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Oncology, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Oncology, Thoracic Surgery, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.166</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Simultaneous Bicavitary Hyperthermic Chemoperfusion in the Management of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei With Synchronous Pleural Extension [Resident's Forum]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>972</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>970</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Resident's Forum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/973?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/973?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kandil, E., King, S., Alabbas, H., Moroz, K., Wright, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Breast Cancer, Oncology, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.172-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>973</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>973</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/974?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/974?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Breast Cancer, Oncology, Other, Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Surgical Oncology, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.172-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>974</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>974</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/975?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/975?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khalaileh, A., Adileh, M., Schlager, A., Abu-Gazalah, S., Mintz, Y., Rivkind, A. I., Keidar, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.171-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Quiz Case [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>975</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>975</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/976?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/976?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Radiologic Imaging, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Diagnosis, Computed Tomography]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.171-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image of the Month--Diagnosis [Special Feature]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>976</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>976</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Special Feature</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/977?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of Colonic and Gastric Standard Laparoscopic Procedures With a Single Skin Incision Approach [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/977?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huscher, C. G., Mingoli, A., Sgarzini, G., Brachini, G., Binda, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.168</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of Colonic and Gastric Standard Laparoscopic Procedures With a Single Skin Incision Approach [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>977</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/977-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Feasibility of Colonic and Gastric Standard Laparoscopic Procedures With a Single Skin Incision Approach--Reply [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/977-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cahill, R. A., Leroy, J., Asakuma, M., Dallemagne, B., Marescaux, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Other, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.169</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of Colonic and Gastric Standard Laparoscopic Procedures With a Single Skin Incision Approach--Reply [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>978</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[No Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery in Rural Community Hospitals [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schittek, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.174</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[No Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery in Rural Community Hospitals [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>978</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>978</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[No Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery in Rural Community Hospitals--Reply [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damrauer, S. M., Bordeianou, L., Berger, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Quality of Care, Other, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.175</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[No Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Surgery in Rural Community Hospitals--Reply [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>978</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>978</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fluorescent Indocyanine Green for Imaging of Bile Ducts During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/978-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pertsemlidis, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.179</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fluorescent Indocyanine Green for Imaging of Bile Ducts During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>978</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>978</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Agarwal, B. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.180</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>979</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>979</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy--Reply [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ishizawa, T., Bandai, Y., Kokudo, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Quality of Care, Patient Safety/ Medical Error, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hepatobiliary Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.181</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy--Reply [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>979</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>979</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital Costs of Conventional and Stapled 1-Day Hemorrhoidectomy [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/979-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cariati, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.177</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital Costs of Conventional and Stapled 1-Day Hemorrhoidectomy [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>980</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>979</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/980?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hospital Costs of Conventional and Stapled 1-Day Hemorrhoidectomy--Reply [Correspondence]]]></title>
<link>http://archsurg.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/144/10/980?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giordano, P., Gravante, G., Ovens, L., Nastro, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:52:02 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Colorectal Surgery, Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.178</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hospital Costs of Conventional and Stapled 1-Day Hemorrhoidectomy--Reply [Correspondence]]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>144</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>980</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>980</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correspondence</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>